FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4322008279> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4322008279 abstract "Abstract Background We aimed to prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) and contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection and liver transplant (LT) eligibility assessment in cirrhotic patients with explant histopathology correlation. Methods In this prospective, single-institution ethics-approved study, 101 cirrhotic patients were enrolled consecutively from the pre-LT clinic with written informed consent. Patients underwent CECT and EOB-MRI alternately every 3 months until LT or study exclusion. Two blinded radiologists independently scored hepatic lesions on CECT and EOB-MRI utilizing the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018. Liver explant histopathology was the reference standard. Pre-LT eligibility accuracies with EOB-MRI and CECT as per Milan criteria (MC) were assessed in reference to post-LT explant histopathology. Lesion-level and patient-level statistical analyses were performed. Results Sixty patients (49 men; age 33–72 years) underwent LT successfully. One hundred four non-treated HCC and 42 viable HCC in previously treated HCC were identified at explant histopathology. For LR-4/5 category lesions, EOB-MRI had a higher pooled sensitivity (86.7% versus 75.3%, p < 0.001) but lower specificity (84.6% versus 100%, p < 0.001) compared to CECT. EOB-MRI had a sensitivity twice that of CECT (65.9% versus 32.2%, p < 0.001) when all HCC identified at explant histopathology were included in the analysis instead of imaging visible lesions only. Disregarding the hepatobiliary phase resulted in a significant drop in EOB-MRI performance (86.7 to 72.8%, p < 0.001). EOB-MRI had significantly lower pooled sensitivity and specificity versus CECT in the LR5 category with lesion size < 2 cm (50% versus 79%, p = 0.002 and 88.9% versus 100%, p = 0.002). EOB-MRI had higher sensitivity (84.8% versus 75%, p < 0.037) compared to CECT for detecting < 2 cm viable HCC in treated lesions. Accuracies of LT eligibility assessment were comparable between EOB-MRI (90–91.7%, p = 0.156) and CECT (90–95%, p = 0.158). Conclusion EOB-MRI had superior sensitivity for HCC detection; however, with lower specificity compared to CECT in LR4/5 category lesions while it was inferior to CECT in the LR5 category under 2 cm. The accuracy for LT eligibility assessment based on MC was not significantly different between EOB-MRI and CECT. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342677 , Registered: November 17, 2017." @default.
• W4322008279 created "2023-02-26" @default.
• W4322008279 creator A5000789082 @default.
• W4322008279 creator A5017435551 @default.
• W4322008279 creator A5019622311 @default.
• W4322008279 creator A5026331544 @default.
• W4322008279 creator A5035077894 @default.
• W4322008279 creator A5043693232 @default.
• W4322008279 creator A5054756446 @default.
• W4322008279 creator A5081545818 @default.
• W4322008279 date "2023-02-25" @default.
• W4322008279 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W4322008279 title "Prospective evaluation of Gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma detection and transplant eligibility assessment with explant histopathology correlation" @default.
• W4322008279 cites W1504628390 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W1971422796 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W1975394378 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W1979762362 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2007525891 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2008655007 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2021320241 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2050738085 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2100645706 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2103243784 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2124655089 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2165933819 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2277004004 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2372275742 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2428245561 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2505970773 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2573152477 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2750897733 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2768270891 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2769505173 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2809490484 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2924401293 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2959810249 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2963120722 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2964886780 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2967396967 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2982415253 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2986357948 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W2995647623 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W3019525387 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W3026099517 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W3044422141 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W3080956895 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W3124770629 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W3135396005 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W3165445689 @default.
• W4322008279 cites W4225429070 @default.
• W4322008279 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00532-3" @default.
• W4322008279 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36841796" @default.
• W4322008279 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4322008279 type Work @default.
• W4322008279 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4322008279 countsByYear W43220082792023 @default.
• W4322008279 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4322008279 hasAuthorship W4322008279A5000789082 @default.
• W4322008279 hasAuthorship W4322008279A5017435551 @default.
• W4322008279 hasAuthorship W4322008279A5019622311 @default.
• W4322008279 hasAuthorship W4322008279A5026331544 @default.
• W4322008279 hasAuthorship W4322008279A5035077894 @default.
• W4322008279 hasAuthorship W4322008279A5043693232 @default.
• W4322008279 hasAuthorship W4322008279A5054756446 @default.
• W4322008279 hasAuthorship W4322008279A5081545818 @default.
• W4322008279 hasBestOaLocation W43220082791 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConcept C2778019345 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConcept C544855455 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConceptScore W4322008279C126322002 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConceptScore W4322008279C126838900 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConceptScore W4322008279C142724271 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConceptScore W4322008279C143409427 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConceptScore W4322008279C188816634 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConceptScore W4322008279C2778019345 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConceptScore W4322008279C2989005 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConceptScore W4322008279C544855455 @default.
• W4322008279 hasConceptScore W4322008279C71924100 @default.
• W4322008279 hasFunder F4320333559 @default.
• W4322008279 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4322008279 hasLocation W43220082791 @default.
• W4322008279 hasLocation W43220082792 @default.
• W4322008279 hasLocation W43220082793 @default.
• W4322008279 hasOpenAccess W4322008279 @default.
• W4322008279 hasPrimaryLocation W43220082791 @default.
• W4322008279 hasRelatedWork W1981897771 @default.
• W4322008279 hasRelatedWork W2000050879 @default.
• W4322008279 hasRelatedWork W2049214470 @default.
• W4322008279 hasRelatedWork W2097796908 @default.
• W4322008279 hasRelatedWork W2295722933 @default.
• W4322008279 hasRelatedWork W2531350361 @default.
• W4322008279 hasRelatedWork W2766588635 @default.
• W4322008279 hasRelatedWork W3187376498 @default.
• W4322008279 hasRelatedWork W4245471151 @default.

• next