Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4322492579> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4322492579 endingPage "311" @default.
- W4322492579 startingPage "311" @default.
- W4322492579 abstract "Importance Expansive growth in the US hospice market has been driven almost exclusively by an increase in for-profit hospices. Prior research found that, in contrast to not-for-profit hospices, for-profit hospices focus on delivering care to patients in nursing homes, provide fewer nursing visits, and use less skilled staff. However, prior studies have not reported on the associations of these differences in care patterns with hospice care quality. Patient- and family-centeredness is a core element of hospice care quality that is measured through surveys of care experiences. Objective To examine whether differences in profit status are associated with family caregivers’ reports of hospice care experiences and assess factors that may be associated with observed differences in care experiences by profit status. Design, Setting, and Participants Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Hospice Survey data from 653 208 caregiver respondents, reflecting care received from 3107 hospices between April 2017 and March 2019, were used for a cross-sectional examination of hospice care experiences by profit status. Data analysis was performed from January 2020 to November 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes were case-mix–adjusted and mode-adjusted top-box scores for 8 measures of hospice care experiences, including communication, timely care, symptom management, and emotional and religious support, as well as a summary score averaging across measures. Linear regression examined the association between profit status and hospice-level scores, adjusting for other organizational and structural hospice characteristics. Results There were 906 not-for-profit and 1761 for-profit hospices with mean (SD) time in operation of 25.7 (7.8) years and 13.8 (8.0) years, respectively. Mean (SD) decedent age at death was 82.8 (2.3) years, similar for not-for-profit and for-profit hospices. The mean proportion of patients who were Black, Hispanic, and White was 4.9%, 0.9%, and 91.4% for not-for-profit hospices and 9.0%, 2.2%, and 85.4% for for-profit hospices, respectively. Family caregivers reported worse care experiences at for-profit hospices than at not-for-profit hospices for all measures. Significant differences in average hospice performance by profit status remained after adjusting for hospice characteristics. However, for-profit hospice performance varied, with 548 of 1761 (31.1%) for-profit hospices scoring 3 or more points below the national hospice average of overall performance and 386 of 1761 (21.9%) scoring 3 or more points above the average. In contrast, only 113 of 906 (12.5%) not-for-profit hospices scored 3 or more points below the average, and 305 of 906 (33.7%) scored 3 or more points above the average. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of CAHPS Hospice Survey data, caregivers of patients receiving hospice care reported substantially worse care experiences in for-profit than in not-for-profit hospices; however, there was variation in reported experiences among both types of hospices. Public reporting of hospice quality is important." @default.
- W4322492579 created "2023-02-28" @default.
- W4322492579 creator A5009016641 @default.
- W4322492579 creator A5028543913 @default.
- W4322492579 creator A5028998712 @default.
- W4322492579 creator A5036294686 @default.
- W4322492579 creator A5047337518 @default.
- W4322492579 creator A5063547983 @default.
- W4322492579 creator A5076299585 @default.
- W4322492579 date "2023-04-01" @default.
- W4322492579 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
- W4322492579 title "Association of Hospice Profit Status With Family Caregivers’ Reported Care Experiences" @default.
- W4322492579 cites W1522506817 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W1563170607 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W1593227499 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W1608451466 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W1847710271 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W1974197596 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W1983738518 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2006526143 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2038936069 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2044805863 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2049613855 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2056792548 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2060519196 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2067826116 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2099002355 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2102192865 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2124781581 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2137401089 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2145139629 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2342798685 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2416964582 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2428924887 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2746566886 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W2884473013 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W3006330888 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W3012255932 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W3016106087 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W3159459712 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W3159691560 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W4235515182 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W4243665306 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W4243887486 @default.
- W4322492579 cites W4280541319 @default.
- W4322492579 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7076" @default.
- W4322492579 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36848095" @default.
- W4322492579 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4322492579 type Work @default.
- W4322492579 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W4322492579 countsByYear W43224925792023 @default.
- W4322492579 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4322492579 hasAuthorship W4322492579A5009016641 @default.
- W4322492579 hasAuthorship W4322492579A5028543913 @default.
- W4322492579 hasAuthorship W4322492579A5028998712 @default.
- W4322492579 hasAuthorship W4322492579A5036294686 @default.
- W4322492579 hasAuthorship W4322492579A5047337518 @default.
- W4322492579 hasAuthorship W4322492579A5063547983 @default.
- W4322492579 hasAuthorship W4322492579A5076299585 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C2780502288 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C2994186709 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C3017577407 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C3019896124 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C30407753 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C10138342 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C159110408 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C159985019 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C162324750 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C192562407 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C2780502288 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C2994186709 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C3017577407 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C3019896124 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C30407753 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C512399662 @default.
- W4322492579 hasConceptScore W4322492579C71924100 @default.
- W4322492579 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W4322492579 hasLocation W43224925791 @default.
- W4322492579 hasLocation W43224925792 @default.
- W4322492579 hasOpenAccess W4322492579 @default.
- W4322492579 hasPrimaryLocation W43224925791 @default.
- W4322492579 hasRelatedWork W1976491401 @default.
- W4322492579 hasRelatedWork W2157609968 @default.
- W4322492579 hasRelatedWork W2271765275 @default.
- W4322492579 hasRelatedWork W2910590812 @default.
- W4322492579 hasRelatedWork W2951305697 @default.
- W4322492579 hasRelatedWork W3207631643 @default.
- W4322492579 hasRelatedWork W4251098778 @default.
- W4322492579 hasRelatedWork W4298284054 @default.
- W4322492579 hasRelatedWork W4302368440 @default.
- W4322492579 hasRelatedWork W4385191655 @default.