FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4322630102> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4322630102 endingPage "1996" @default.
• W4322630102 startingPage "1996" @default.
• W4322630102 abstract "This systematic review aimed to study the outcomes of CAD-CAM (milled and 3D-printed) interim dental prostheses when compared to conventional ones. The focused question of “In natural teeth, what are the outcomes of CAD-CAM interim FDPs compared to the conventionally-manufactured ones regarding marginal fit, mechanical properties, esthetics, and color stability” was formulated. The systematic search was conducted electronically in the PubMed/MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Web of Science, New York Academy of Medicine Grey Literature Report, and Google Scholar databases by using the MeSH keywords and keywords associated with the focused question and limiting articles to those published between 2000 and 2022. A manual search was conducted in selected dental journals. The results were analyzed qualitatively and are presented in table format. Of the included studies, 18 studies were in vitro and 1 was a randomized clinical trial. Of the eight studies analyzing the mechanical properties, five studies favored the milled interim restorations, one study favored both 3D-printed and milled interim restorations, and two studies reported better mechanical properties in conventional interim restorations. Among four studies evaluating the marginal discrepancies, two studies favored the marginal fit in milled interim restorations, one study reported a better marginal fit in both milled and 3D-printed interim restorations, and one study found conventional interim restorations have a better marginal fit and smaller marginal discrepancy when compared to both milled and 3D-printed restorations. Among five studies that evaluated both the mechanical properties and marginal fit, 1 study favored 3D-printed interim restorations and four studies favored milled interim restorations over the conventional ones. Two studies analyzing the esthetics outcomes demonstrated better results with milled interim restorations compared to conventional and 3D-printed interim restorations in terms of their color stabilities. The risk of bias was low for all the studies reviewed. The high level of heterogeneity within the studies excluded meta-analysis. Most of the studies favored the milled interim restorations over the 3D-printed and conventional restorations. The results suggested that milled interim restorations offer a better marginal fit, higher mechanical properties, and better esthetic outcomes in terms of color stabilities." @default.
• W4322630102 created "2023-03-01" @default.
• W4322630102 creator A5024437245 @default.
• W4322630102 creator A5036935746 @default.
• W4322630102 creator A5043658912 @default.
• W4322630102 creator A5067779707 @default.
• W4322630102 creator A5078290152 @default.
• W4322630102 creator A5084548945 @default.
• W4322630102 date "2023-02-28" @default.
• W4322630102 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4322630102 title "Marginal Fit, Mechanical Properties, and Esthetic Outcomes of CAD/CAM Interim Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDPs): A Systematic Review" @default.
• W4322630102 cites W1491750767 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W1649842605 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W1965281399 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W1966634267 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W1979347907 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W1981125430 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2013151364 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2042911253 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2077481738 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2093610329 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2111722073 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2116475791 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2121229714 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2147602153 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2148317989 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2153226635 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2156613365 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2234087603 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2237388186 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2296171414 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2395211784 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2403337870 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2406131479 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2414761009 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2467075864 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2588681363 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2758902715 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2765908246 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2793921782 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2888747634 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2890951982 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2894917717 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2942699259 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W2995061164 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3005988920 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3027773795 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3040342799 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3080318123 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3089929872 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3119875571 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3122170867 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3125048976 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3135170440 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3182945732 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3201216129 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W3204899986 @default.
• W4322630102 cites W770127377 @default.
• W4322630102 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051996" @default.
• W4322630102 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36903109" @default.
• W4322630102 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4322630102 type Work @default.
• W4322630102 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4322630102 countsByYear W43226301022023 @default.
• W4322630102 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4322630102 hasAuthorship W4322630102A5024437245 @default.
• W4322630102 hasAuthorship W4322630102A5036935746 @default.
• W4322630102 hasAuthorship W4322630102A5043658912 @default.
• W4322630102 hasAuthorship W4322630102A5067779707 @default.
• W4322630102 hasAuthorship W4322630102A5078290152 @default.
• W4322630102 hasAuthorship W4322630102A5084548945 @default.
• W4322630102 hasBestOaLocation W43226301021 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C2776957806 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C61943457 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C126322002 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C141071460 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C166957645 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C168563851 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C19527891 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C199343813 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C2776957806 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C29694066 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C61943457 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C71924100 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C95190672 @default.
• W4322630102 hasConceptScore W4322630102C95457728 @default.
• W4322630102 hasIssue "5" @default.

• next