FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4323305202> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4323305202 abstract "Abstract Purpose: While laparoscopic simulation-based training is a well-established component of general surgery training, no such requirement or standardized curriculum exists for robotic surgery. Furthermore, there is a lack of high-fidelity electrocautery simulation training exercises in the literature. Using Messick’s validity framework, we sought to determine the content, response process, internal content and construct validity of a novel inanimate tissue model that utilizes electrocautery for potential incorporation in such curricula. Methods : Multi-institutional, prospective study involving medical students (MS) and general surgery residents (PGY1-3). Participants performed an exercise using a biotissue bowel model on the da Vinci Xi robotic console during which they created an enterotomy using electrocautery followed by approximation with interrupted sutures. Participant performance was recorded and then scored by crowd-sourced assessors of technical skill along with three of the authors. Construct validity was determined via difference in Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) score, time to completion and total number of errors between the two cohorts. Upon completion of the exercise, participants were surveyed on their perception of the exercise and its impact on their robotic training to determine content validity. Results : 31 participants were enrolled and separated into two cohorts: MS + PGY1 vs PGY2-3. Time spent on the robotic trainer (0.8 vs 8.13 hours, p=0.002), number of bedside robotic assists (5.7 vs 14.8, p<0.001), and number of robotic cases as primary surgeon (0.3 vs 13.1, p<0.001) were statistically significant between the two groups. Differences in GEARS scores (18.5 vs 19.9, p=0.001), time to completion (26.1 vs 14.4 min, p<0.001), and total errors (21.5 vs 11.9, p=0.018) between the groups were statistically significant as well. Of the 23 participants that completed the post-exercise survey, 87% and 91.3% reported improvement in robotic surgical ability and confidence, respectively. On a 10-point Likert scale, respondents rated the realism of the exercise 7.5, educational benefit 9.1, and effectiveness in teaching robotic skills 8.7. Controlling for the upfront investment of certain training materials, each exercise iteration cost ~$30. Conclusions : This study confirmed the content, response process, internal structure and construct validity of a novel, high-fidelity and cost-effective inanimate tissue exercise which successfully incorporates electrocautery. Consideration should be given to its addition to robotic surgery training programs." @default.
• W4323305202 created "2023-03-07" @default.
• W4323305202 creator A5005988031 @default.
• W4323305202 creator A5020460183 @default.
• W4323305202 creator A5041047101 @default.
• W4323305202 creator A5049082610 @default.
• W4323305202 creator A5052031709 @default.
• W4323305202 creator A5053356845 @default.
• W4323305202 creator A5073729419 @default.
• W4323305202 date "2023-03-07" @default.
• W4323305202 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4323305202 title "Intentional Enterotomies: Validation of a Novel Robotic Surgery Training Exercise" @default.
• W4323305202 cites W1549707964 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W1758566279 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W1906742952 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W1947943371 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W1964218847 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W1966322033 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W1980639574 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W1989460737 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2016169146 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2021462521 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2072503051 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2081725020 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2085304224 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2103356100 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2106346194 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2113824240 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2146626663 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2149258477 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2188053957 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2235750012 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2309839805 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2610350560 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2620915816 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2767657473 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2804311512 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2907090575 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2913065949 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2933767718 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2947409518 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W2996979006 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W3155056204 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W3175876416 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W320837710 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W4226197178 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W4282921198 @default.
• W4323305202 cites W4300987477 @default.
• W4323305202 doi "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2641191/v1" @default.
• W4323305202 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4323305202 type Work @default.
• W4323305202 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4323305202 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4323305202 hasAuthorship W4323305202A5005988031 @default.
• W4323305202 hasAuthorship W4323305202A5020460183 @default.
• W4323305202 hasAuthorship W4323305202A5041047101 @default.
• W4323305202 hasAuthorship W4323305202A5049082610 @default.
• W4323305202 hasAuthorship W4323305202A5052031709 @default.
• W4323305202 hasAuthorship W4323305202A5053356845 @default.
• W4323305202 hasAuthorship W4323305202A5073729419 @default.
• W4323305202 hasBestOaLocation W43233052021 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C102959455 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C103203806 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C2779037301 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C2780463512 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C2780778865 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C2780801425 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C102959455 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C103203806 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C105795698 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C141071460 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C15744967 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C1862650 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C19417346 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C19527891 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C199360897 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C2775944032 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C2779037301 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C2780463512 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C2780778865 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C2780801425 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C33923547 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C41008148 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C47177190 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C49453240 @default.
• W4323305202 hasConceptScore W4323305202C71924100 @default.

• next