Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4323338002> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 43 of
43
with 100 items per page.
- W4323338002 endingPage "25" @default.
- W4323338002 startingPage "19" @default.
- W4323338002 abstract "By the beginning of the fourteenth century the production of a royal pardon was a familiar method of claiming immunity from common law procedures. Suspects who could present a charter of pardon to the justices at the time of their arraignment were not required to answer formal charges, while those who secured one subsequently could seek acquittal, or even remission of a conviction. Similarly those in danger of infringing the feudal and proprietary rights of the Crown, by purchasing land without royal licence, for example, could purchase a pardon and thus circumvent cumbersome legal procedures. For anyone who stood in need of such a letter, one form of pardon was theoretically available to all of the king's subjects at any time. This was the ‘individual pardon’, so called because it only ever covered the offences with which one person might be accused. Those who sought an individual pardon would submit a petition, or have one submitted on their behalf, and each case was judged according to the particular circumstances that attended it. In routine cases the royal justices themselves could set the procedure of pardoning in motion, by exercising their power to recommend mercy. The criteria on which cases were judged remained largely consistent, and most routine requests appear to have been approved as a matter of course on the authority of the chancellor, who was empowered to act in the king's name (these are referred to as pardons de cursu). Alternatively, if the circumstances of the case were unusual, the decision might be referred to the king and council (pardons de gracia). Accordingly, the issue of individual pardons continued steadily throughout the century." @default.
- W4323338002 created "2023-03-08" @default.
- W4323338002 date "2009-11-19" @default.
- W4323338002 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
- W4323338002 title "Procedures" @default.
- W4323338002 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/9781846157585.002" @default.
- W4323338002 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W4323338002 type Work @default.
- W4323338002 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W4323338002 countsByYear W43233380022019 @default.
- W4323338002 crossrefType "other" @default.
- W4323338002 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConcept C2777278149 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConcept C2777596936 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConcept C2777710833 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConcept C511693568 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConceptScore W4323338002C17744445 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConceptScore W4323338002C199539241 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConceptScore W4323338002C2777278149 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConceptScore W4323338002C2777596936 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConceptScore W4323338002C2777710833 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConceptScore W4323338002C511693568 @default.
- W4323338002 hasConceptScore W4323338002C94625758 @default.
- W4323338002 hasLocation W43233380021 @default.
- W4323338002 hasOpenAccess W4323338002 @default.
- W4323338002 hasPrimaryLocation W43233380021 @default.
- W4323338002 hasRelatedWork W2007018400 @default.
- W4323338002 hasRelatedWork W2145716654 @default.
- W4323338002 hasRelatedWork W2254668217 @default.
- W4323338002 hasRelatedWork W2323090079 @default.
- W4323338002 hasRelatedWork W2417770685 @default.
- W4323338002 hasRelatedWork W2803087369 @default.
- W4323338002 hasRelatedWork W3121488800 @default.
- W4323338002 hasRelatedWork W3121899353 @default.
- W4323338002 hasRelatedWork W3217540384 @default.
- W4323338002 hasRelatedWork W5987121 @default.
- W4323338002 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4323338002 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4323338002 workType "other" @default.