FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4323664466> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4323664466 endingPage "427" @default.
• W4323664466 startingPage "405" @default.
• W4323664466 abstract "BackgroundThe widespread introduction of minimally invasive endovascular techniques in cardiovascular surgery has necessitated a transition in the psychomotor skillset of trainees and surgeons. Simulation has previously been used in surgical training; however, there is limited high-quality evidence regarding the role of simulation-based training on the acquisition of endovascular skills. This systematic review aimed to systematically appraise the currently available evidence regarding endovascular high-fidelity simulation interventions, to describe the overarching strategies used, the learning outcomes addressed, the choice of assessment methodology, and the impact of education on learner performance.MethodsA comprehensive literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement using relevant keywords to identify studies evaluating simulation in the acquisition of endovascular surgical skills. References of review articles were screened for additional studies.ResultsA total of 1,081 studies were identified (474 after removal of duplicates). There was marked heterogeneity in methodologies and reporting of outcomes. Quantitative analysis was deemed inappropriate due to the risk of serious confounding and bias. Instead, a descriptive synthesis was performed, summarizing key findings and quality components. Eighteen studies were included in the synthesis (15 observational, 2 case-control and 1 randomized control studies). Most studies measured procedure time, contrast usage, and fluoroscopy time. Other metrics were recorded to a lesser extent. Significant reductions were noted in both procedure and fluoroscopy times with the introduction of simulation-based endovascular training.ConclusionsThe evidence regarding the use of high-fidelity simulation in endovascular training is very heterogeneous. The current literature suggests simulation-based training leads to improvements in performance, mostly in terms of procedure and fluoroscopy time. High-quality randomized control trials are needed to establish the clinical benefits of simulation training, sustainability of improvements, transferability of skills and its cost-effectiveness. The widespread introduction of minimally invasive endovascular techniques in cardiovascular surgery has necessitated a transition in the psychomotor skillset of trainees and surgeons. Simulation has previously been used in surgical training; however, there is limited high-quality evidence regarding the role of simulation-based training on the acquisition of endovascular skills. This systematic review aimed to systematically appraise the currently available evidence regarding endovascular high-fidelity simulation interventions, to describe the overarching strategies used, the learning outcomes addressed, the choice of assessment methodology, and the impact of education on learner performance. A comprehensive literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement using relevant keywords to identify studies evaluating simulation in the acquisition of endovascular surgical skills. References of review articles were screened for additional studies. A total of 1,081 studies were identified (474 after removal of duplicates). There was marked heterogeneity in methodologies and reporting of outcomes. Quantitative analysis was deemed inappropriate due to the risk of serious confounding and bias. Instead, a descriptive synthesis was performed, summarizing key findings and quality components. Eighteen studies were included in the synthesis (15 observational, 2 case-control and 1 randomized control studies). Most studies measured procedure time, contrast usage, and fluoroscopy time. Other metrics were recorded to a lesser extent. Significant reductions were noted in both procedure and fluoroscopy times with the introduction of simulation-based endovascular training. The evidence regarding the use of high-fidelity simulation in endovascular training is very heterogeneous. The current literature suggests simulation-based training leads to improvements in performance, mostly in terms of procedure and fluoroscopy time. High-quality randomized control trials are needed to establish the clinical benefits of simulation training, sustainability of improvements, transferability of skills and its cost-effectiveness." @default.
• W4323664466 created "2023-03-10" @default.
• W4323664466 creator A5006750448 @default.
• W4323664466 creator A5013451548 @default.
• W4323664466 creator A5029772193 @default.
• W4323664466 creator A5035502996 @default.
• W4323664466 date "2023-07-01" @default.
• W4323664466 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4323664466 title "The Role of High-Fidelity Simulation in the Acquisition of Endovascular Surgical Skills: A Systematic Review" @default.
• W4323664466 cites W1131294740 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W127283835 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W1967584956 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W1971071528 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2021641534 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2031047156 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2032553839 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2040978167 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2046817201 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2053030771 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2057843198 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2086613819 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2097592370 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2098020237 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2128972008 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2130069026 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2134197185 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2140246832 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2150070886 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2154631598 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2156990782 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2164392040 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2168164897 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2170520718 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2185467918 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2194872615 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2198364948 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2299004050 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2326838862 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2400819915 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2565453857 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2566921412 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2616445575 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2752512237 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2887587354 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2905155922 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W2981152230 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W3013099030 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W3033722604 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W3045140428 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W3118615836 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W3173451591 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W3211998549 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W4281296024 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W794410119 @default.
• W4323664466 cites W91113326 @default.
• W4323664466 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.02.025" @default.
• W4323664466 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36906131" @default.
• W4323664466 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4323664466 type Work @default.
• W4323664466 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4323664466 countsByYear W43236644662023 @default.
• W4323664466 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4323664466 hasAuthorship W4323664466A5006750448 @default.
• W4323664466 hasAuthorship W4323664466A5013451548 @default.
• W4323664466 hasAuthorship W4323664466A5029772193 @default.
• W4323664466 hasAuthorship W4323664466A5035502996 @default.
• W4323664466 hasBestOaLocation W43236644661 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C164953862 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C2776459999 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C2776805002 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConceptScore W4323664466C118552586 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConceptScore W4323664466C141071460 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConceptScore W4323664466C142724271 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConceptScore W4323664466C159110408 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConceptScore W4323664466C164953862 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConceptScore W4323664466C168563851 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConceptScore W4323664466C169900460 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConceptScore W4323664466C17744445 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConceptScore W4323664466C189708586 @default.
• W4323664466 hasConceptScore W4323664466C19527891 @default.

• next