FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4324017844> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4324017844 endingPage "1166" @default.
• W4324017844 startingPage "1160" @default.
• W4324017844 abstract "This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) compared to conventional laparoscopic radical resection in the treatment of patients with sigmoid colon/high rectal cancer.The control group (n = 62) underwent traditional laparoscopic radical resection, and the observation group (n = 62) underwent transanal NOSES laparoscopic radical resection. The operation length; amount of bleeding; number of lymph node dissections and days of hospitalization after surgery; visual pain scores on the first and third days after surgery; first leaving bed, anal exhaust, eating a liquid diet, and effective sleep times; and the postoperative complications (abdominal or incision infection or anastomotic fistula) of the two groups of patients were compared and analyzed.The effective sleep time of the observation group on the first day after the operation was 12.3 ± 2.9 h, which was longer than that of the control group (10.6 ± 3.2 h), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The pain degree of the two groups on the third day after the operation was lower than that on the first day, and the pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (2.0 ± 1.0 vs. 3.2 ± 1.2, p < 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (9.7 ± 2.3 vs. 11.2 ± 2.6, p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (3.2% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.048). In addition, it was found that the first leaving bed, anal exhaust and liquid diet times in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (p < 0.001).Laparoscopic radical resection NOSES in patients with sigmoid colon cancer or high rectal cancer leads to lower postoperative pain and longer sleep time than in patients who undergo traditional laparoscopic radical surgery. The complication rate of this procedure is low, and the curative effect is safe and positive." @default.
• W4324017844 created "2023-03-14" @default.
• W4324017844 creator A5029848730 @default.
• W4324017844 creator A5066061403 @default.
• W4324017844 creator A5066521512 @default.
• W4324017844 creator A5091787259 @default.
• W4324017844 date "2023-03-13" @default.
• W4324017844 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W4324017844 title "A comparison of the efficacy and safety of natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with sigmoid colon/high rectal cancer" @default.
• W4324017844 cites W1966157787 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W1969561516 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2036336889 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2048481807 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2067827085 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2165579757 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2174703946 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2213998036 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2584463286 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2608119501 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2746321084 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2769721630 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W2783945117 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W4200432177 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W4287378218 @default.
• W4324017844 cites W4293574947 @default.
• W4324017844 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27235" @default.
• W4324017844 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36913188" @default.
• W4324017844 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4324017844 type Work @default.
• W4324017844 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4324017844 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4324017844 hasAuthorship W4324017844A5029848730 @default.
• W4324017844 hasAuthorship W4324017844A5066061403 @default.
• W4324017844 hasAuthorship W4324017844A5066521512 @default.
• W4324017844 hasAuthorship W4324017844A5091787259 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConceptScore W4324017844C121608353 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConceptScore W4324017844C126322002 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConceptScore W4324017844C141071460 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConceptScore W4324017844C2776111594 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConceptScore W4324017844C2780047204 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConceptScore W4324017844C2780120127 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConceptScore W4324017844C42219234 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConceptScore W4324017844C526805850 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConceptScore W4324017844C71924100 @default.
• W4324017844 hasConceptScore W4324017844C8443397 @default.
• W4324017844 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W4324017844 hasLocation W43240178441 @default.
• W4324017844 hasLocation W43240178442 @default.
• W4324017844 hasOpenAccess W4324017844 @default.
• W4324017844 hasPrimaryLocation W43240178441 @default.
• W4324017844 hasRelatedWork W2052538295 @default.
• W4324017844 hasRelatedWork W2077138008 @default.
• W4324017844 hasRelatedWork W2091850843 @default.
• W4324017844 hasRelatedWork W2153618163 @default.
• W4324017844 hasRelatedWork W2197314980 @default.
• W4324017844 hasRelatedWork W2391490740 @default.
• W4324017844 hasRelatedWork W2418199038 @default.
• W4324017844 hasRelatedWork W2444375365 @default.
• W4324017844 hasRelatedWork W3030740161 @default.
• W4324017844 hasRelatedWork W4292846046 @default.
• W4324017844 hasVolume "127" @default.
• W4324017844 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4324017844 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4324017844 workType "article" @default.