FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4327777793> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4327777793 endingPage "137" @default.
• W4327777793 startingPage "137" @default.
• W4327777793 abstract "The proliferation of online disinformation and the rise of private censorship are paradigmatic examples of the challenges to traditional First Amendment jurisprudence in an algorithmic society. The limitations of traditional First Amendment jurisprudence are amplified by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in two ways. On the one hand, in the wake of the pandemic, we have entered an “infodemic” era where the volume of disinformation, as well as the harm it causes have reached unprecedented levels. For example, health disinformation has contributed to vaccine hesitancy. On the other hand, even though the proliferation of online disinformation seems to suggest that it is desirable to enforce content moderation more rigorously, the pandemic has also revealed the importance of access to online information, raising concerns about censorship imposed by private platforms on social media users. Furthermore, the high degree of opacity and unpredictability of content moderation pose great danger to users’ First Amendment right. In light of the above consideration, this Note proposes a legal framework that would curtail online disinformation while ensuring users’ right to accessing online platforms. To achieve this goal, this Note argues that the First Amendment should be interpreted as not merely a negative right but also a positive right. That is, the traditional laissez-faire First Amendment jurisprudence, which considers public actors as the sole threat to freedom of speech and neglects the power asymmetry between private platforms and their users, should be rejected. The underlying principle of the positive approach is to design a regulatory regime that is least restrictive and fosters accountability and transparency in content moderation by introducing procedural requirements. In this regard, the recently introduced Digital Services Act in the European Union—which represents a paradigmatic shift from interpreting freedom of speech as a “negative right” (i.e., protecting users from government interferences) to a “positive right” (i.e., ensuring the government provides users with sufficient procedural safeguards to check against private platforms)—could provide some important lessons for the U.S. to reconstruct its online platforms regulation in the era of an algorithmic society." @default.
• W4327777793 created "2023-03-19" @default.
• W4327777793 creator A5085748030 @default.
• W4327777793 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4327777793 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4327777793 title "Private Censorship, Disinformation and the First Amendment: Rethinking Online Platforms Regulation in the Era of a Global Pandemic" @default.
• W4327777793 doi "https://doi.org/10.36645/mtlr.29.1.private" @default.
• W4327777793 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4327777793 type Work @default.
• W4327777793 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4327777793 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4327777793 hasAuthorship W4327777793A5085748030 @default.
• W4327777793 hasBestOaLocation W43277777931 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C2776552730 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C52930066 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C108827166 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C144024400 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C17744445 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C190253527 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C199539241 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C2776552730 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C2777363581 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C41008148 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C518677369 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C52930066 @default.
• W4327777793 hasConceptScore W4327777793C71043370 @default.
• W4327777793 hasIssue "29.1" @default.
• W4327777793 hasLocation W43277777931 @default.
• W4327777793 hasOpenAccess W4327777793 @default.
• W4327777793 hasPrimaryLocation W43277777931 @default.
• W4327777793 hasRelatedWork W2040912437 @default.
• W4327777793 hasRelatedWork W3080472464 @default.
• W4327777793 hasRelatedWork W3118192162 @default.
• W4327777793 hasRelatedWork W3144668845 @default.
• W4327777793 hasRelatedWork W3154558812 @default.
• W4327777793 hasRelatedWork W4221111914 @default.
• W4327777793 hasRelatedWork W4223520621 @default.
• W4327777793 hasRelatedWork W4304808133 @default.
• W4327777793 hasRelatedWork W4321836346 @default.
• W4327777793 hasRelatedWork W4372352545 @default.
• W4327777793 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4327777793 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4327777793 workType "article" @default.