FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4328049296> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4328049296 endingPage "e0283013" @default.
• W4328049296 startingPage "e0283013" @default.
• W4328049296 abstract "Background This systematic review aimed to assess the certainty of evidence for digital versus conventional, face-to-face physiotherapy assessment of musculoskeletal disorders, concerning validity, reliability, feasibility, patient satisfaction, physiotherapist satisfaction, adverse events, clinical management, and cost-effectiveness. Methods Eligibility criteria: Original studies comparing digital physiotherapy assessment with face-to-face physiotherapy assessment of musculoskeletal disorders. Systematic database searches were performed in May 2021, and updated in May 2022, in Medline, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, AMED, and PEDro. Risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool and the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies tool. Included studies were synthesised narratively. Certainty of evidence was evaluated for each assessment component using GRADE. Results Ten repeated-measures studies were included, involving 193 participants aged 23–62 years. Reported validity of digital physiotherapy assessment ranged from moderate/acceptable to almost perfect/excellent for clinical tests, range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), pain, neck posture, and management decisions. Reported validity for assessing spinal posture varied and was for clinical observations unacceptably low. Reported validity and reliability for digital diagnosis ranged from moderate to almost perfect for exact+similar agreement, but was considerably lower when constrained to exact agreement. Reported reliability was excellent for digital assessment of clinical tests, range of motion, pain, neck posture, and PROMs. Certainty of evidence varied from very low to high, with PROMs and pain assessment obtaining the highest certainty. Patients were satisfied with their digital assessment, but did not perceive it as good as face-to-face assessment. Discussion Evidence ranging from very low to high certainty suggests that validity and reliability of digital physiotherapy assessments are acceptable to excellent for several assessment components. Digital physiotherapy assessment may be a viable alternative to face-to-face assessment for patients who are likely to benefit from the accessibility and convenience of remote access. Trial registration The review was registered in the PROSPERO database, CRD42021277624 ." @default.
• W4328049296 created "2023-03-22" @default.
• W4328049296 creator A5015042656 @default.
• W4328049296 creator A5023964059 @default.
• W4328049296 creator A5029509502 @default.
• W4328049296 creator A5039276697 @default.
• W4328049296 creator A5065956136 @default.
• W4328049296 creator A5066137996 @default.
• W4328049296 creator A5073253331 @default.
• W4328049296 creator A5075018311 @default.
• W4328049296 creator A5077309963 @default.
• W4328049296 creator A5082722934 @default.
• W4328049296 date "2023-03-21" @default.
• W4328049296 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4328049296 title "Digital physiotherapy assessment vs conventional face-to-face physiotherapy assessment of patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review" @default.
• W4328049296 cites W1963807200 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W1967731087 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W1968146494 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W1972111681 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W1974202249 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W1979447023 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2001773933 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2004754006 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2028012836 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2030430403 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2054108010 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2066874849 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2069378996 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2096627734 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2097220938 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2107638293 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2115988342 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2141403362 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2149874500 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2157091475 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2172151487 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2202393465 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2304195142 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2332019618 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2334032738 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2369990364 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2523880444 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2560438049 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2606084331 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2751830983 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2805331476 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2895341194 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2895401986 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2896681704 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2911094222 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2919556098 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2951154445 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2953967060 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2967134589 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W2971094029 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3005727251 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3019006697 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3036586280 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3036641899 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3045694650 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3092479254 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3093926584 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3118063844 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3128858570 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3137825583 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3144543375 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3176657534 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3203986037 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W3209453746 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W4200173246 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W4212857247 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W4213231174 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W4213339236 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W4234180827 @default.
• W4328049296 cites W4282924562 @default.
• W4328049296 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283013" @default.
• W4328049296 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36943857" @default.
• W4328049296 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4328049296 type Work @default.
• W4328049296 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4328049296 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4328049296 hasAuthorship W4328049296A5015042656 @default.
• W4328049296 hasAuthorship W4328049296A5023964059 @default.
• W4328049296 hasAuthorship W4328049296A5029509502 @default.
• W4328049296 hasAuthorship W4328049296A5039276697 @default.
• W4328049296 hasAuthorship W4328049296A5065956136 @default.
• W4328049296 hasAuthorship W4328049296A5066137996 @default.
• W4328049296 hasAuthorship W4328049296A5073253331 @default.
• W4328049296 hasAuthorship W4328049296A5075018311 @default.
• W4328049296 hasAuthorship W4328049296A5077309963 @default.
• W4328049296 hasAuthorship W4328049296A5082722934 @default.
• W4328049296 hasBestOaLocation W43280492961 @default.
• W4328049296 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4328049296 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4328049296 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4328049296 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4328049296 hasConcept C159110408 @default.

• next