FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4328049330> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4328049330 endingPage "e1004175" @default.
• W4328049330 startingPage "e1004175" @default.
• W4328049330 abstract "Background University Medical Centers (UMCs) must do their part for clinical trial transparency by fostering practices such as prospective registration, timely results reporting, and open access. However, research institutions are often unaware of their performance on these practices. Baseline assessments of these practices would highlight where there is room for change and empower UMCs to support improvement. We performed a status quo analysis of established clinical trial registration and reporting practices at German UMCs and developed a dashboard to communicate these baseline assessments with UMC leadership and the wider research community. Methods and findings We developed and applied a semiautomated approach to assess adherence to established transparency practices in a cohort of interventional trials and associated results publications. Trials were registered in ClinicalTrials.gov or the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), led by a German UMC, and reported as complete between 2009 and 2017. To assess adherence to transparency practices, we identified results publications associated to trials and applied automated methods at the level of registry data (e.g., prospective registration) and publications (e.g., open access). We also obtained summary results reporting rates of due trials registered in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EUCTR) and conducted at German UMCs from the EU Trials Tracker. We developed an interactive dashboard to display these results across all UMCs and at the level of single UMCs. Our study included and assessed 2,895 interventional trials led by 35 German UMCs. Across all UMCs, prospective registration increased from 33% ( n = 58/178) to 75% ( n = 144/193) for trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and from 0% ( n = 0/44) to 79% ( n = 19/24) for trials registered in DRKS over the period considered. Of trials with a results publication, 38% ( n = 714/1,895) reported the trial registration number in the publication abstract. In turn, 58% ( n = 861/1,493) of trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and 23% ( n = 111/474) of trials registered in DRKS linked the publication in the registration. In contrast to recent increases in summary results reporting of drug trials in the EUCTR, 8% ( n = 191/2,253) and 3% ( n = 20/642) of due trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and DRKS, respectively, had summary results in the registry. Across trial completion years, timely results reporting (within 2 years of trial completion) as a manuscript publication or as summary results was 41% ( n = 1,198/2,892). The proportion of openly accessible trial publications steadily increased from 42% ( n = 16/38) to 74% ( n = 72/97) over the period considered. A limitation of this study is that some of the methods used to assess the transparency practices in this dashboard rely on registry data being accurate and up-to-date. Conclusions In this study, we observed that it is feasible to assess and inform individual UMCs on their performance on clinical trial transparency in a reproducible and publicly accessible way. Beyond helping institutions assess how they perform in relation to mandates or their institutional policy, the dashboard may inform interventions to increase the uptake of clinical transparency practices and serve to evaluate the impact of these interventions." @default.
• W4328049330 created "2023-03-22" @default.
• W4328049330 creator A5010273880 @default.
• W4328049330 creator A5070578048 @default.
• W4328049330 creator A5082173751 @default.
• W4328049330 creator A5086279697 @default.
• W4328049330 creator A5087747193 @default.
• W4328049330 date "2023-03-21" @default.
• W4328049330 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4328049330 title "Institutional dashboards on clinical trial transparency for University Medical Centers: A case study" @default.
• W4328049330 cites W1965875998 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W1975130349 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W2130755479 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W2277874940 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W2302501749 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W2581784150 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W2773899110 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W2794944797 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W2890257456 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W2950476194 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W3001581533 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W3004793134 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W3005930964 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W3037442288 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W3042880226 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W3097085767 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W3097500482 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W3120711451 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W4200109660 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W4225109369 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W4226049264 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W4226134158 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W4229460471 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W4283383843 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W4292324277 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W4317811243 @default.
• W4328049330 cites W4317866649 @default.
• W4328049330 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004175" @default.
• W4328049330 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36943836" @default.
• W4328049330 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4328049330 type Work @default.
• W4328049330 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4328049330 countsByYear W43280493302023 @default.
• W4328049330 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4328049330 hasAuthorship W4328049330A5010273880 @default.
• W4328049330 hasAuthorship W4328049330A5070578048 @default.
• W4328049330 hasAuthorship W4328049330A5082173751 @default.
• W4328049330 hasAuthorship W4328049330A5086279697 @default.
• W4328049330 hasAuthorship W4328049330A5087747193 @default.
• W4328049330 hasBestOaLocation W43280493301 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C116567970 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C154775046 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C2778653282 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C60644358 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C116567970 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C126322002 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C154775046 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C166957645 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C2778653282 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C512399662 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C535046627 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C60644358 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C71924100 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C86803240 @default.
• W4328049330 hasConceptScore W4328049330C95457728 @default.
• W4328049330 hasFunder F4320321114 @default.
• W4328049330 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4328049330 hasLocation W43280493301 @default.
• W4328049330 hasLocation W43280493302 @default.
• W4328049330 hasLocation W43280493303 @default.
• W4328049330 hasOpenAccess W4328049330 @default.
• W4328049330 hasPrimaryLocation W43280493301 @default.
• W4328049330 hasRelatedWork W1564707045 @default.
• W4328049330 hasRelatedWork W1967323123 @default.
• W4328049330 hasRelatedWork W2078277360 @default.
• W4328049330 hasRelatedWork W2114766879 @default.
• W4328049330 hasRelatedWork W2794102768 @default.
• W4328049330 hasRelatedWork W2799726101 @default.
• W4328049330 hasRelatedWork W2886961143 @default.
• W4328049330 hasRelatedWork W2921742687 @default.
• W4328049330 hasRelatedWork W3152832657 @default.
• W4328049330 hasRelatedWork W4328049330 @default.
• W4328049330 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W4328049330 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4328049330 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4328049330 workType "article" @default.