Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4328101199> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 78 of
78
with 100 items per page.
- W4328101199 abstract "Les nouvelles technologies, basées sur le numérique, promettent une révolution dans le champ de la médecine. La santé mentale voit émerger de nombreuses innovations telles que le phénotype numérique, la prédiction diagnostique ou les thérapies numériques. Plus particulièrement, les Applications mobiles (Apps) vont contribuer à la psychoéducation, au diagnostic, à l’identification et au suivi des symptômes de façon personnalisée, à la thérapeutique (interventions psychothérapiques, stratégies de coping), à la prévention chez les sujets à risque et enfin à l’aide à la décision médicale. Cependant, de nombreuses revues ou méta-analyses soulignent le manque récurrent de preuves scientifiques pour une grande majorité des outils proposés. Ce point contribue à la défiance observée chez les professionnels en santé mentale vis-à-vis des nouvelles technologies et impose une réflexion sur la définition et l’évaluation de ces outils, mais aussi au niveau de la formation les concernant. Dans cet article, nous rappellerons en premier quels sont les enjeux actuels du numérique en santé mentale et préciserons quelles sont les doctrines des différentes instances impliquées au niveau national dans leur développement. Deuxièmement, nous donnerons une définition de ces différents outils numériques. Troisièmement, après avoir précisé sur quels éléments repose le concept de dispositif médical, qui permet d’offrir des outils scientifiquement éprouvés, nous proposerons des critères actuels et futurs de leur évaluation, en particulier autour de la notion d’acceptabilité. L’objectif global est donc d’apporter aux utilisateurs les repères nécessaires à la constitution d’un cadre théorique pour une utilisation optimale du numérique en psychiatrie. New, digital-based technologies promise a revolution in the field of medicine. Mental health is experiencing the emergence of numerous innovations such as digital phenotyping, the use of AI in diagnostics, and digital therapies. Digital technology can improve psychiatry by creating new treatment strategies that are available to a larger number of people. It will enable the development of new therapeutic modalities: mobile applications (Apps) will contribute to psycho-education, diagnosis, identification of and monitoring of symptoms in a personalized way, to therapy (psychotherapeutic interventions, coping strategies), to prevention in at-risk subjects and finally to medical decision support. Finally, digital technology can allow us to exploit new data collection methods and thus improve our scientific research in order to analyze, detect, predict and even prevent symptoms. However, many reviews or meta-analyses stress the recurrent lack of scientific evidence for a large majority of the proposed tools and that there is often a significant gap between the designers’ statements and their real therapeutic potential. In addition, some of these proposed tools are said to be emerging because they present new ideas or improve the service provided. Others are said to be “disruptive”, a term that defines technologies that result in a breakthrough by creating new methods or processes that replace those previously used. Finally, those that need to be developed further are described as “immature”, which is frequently the case in mental health. These different points contribute to the distrust observed among mental health professionals with regard to new technologies. But above all, various studies have shown that rejection was not necessarily due to theoretical positions, but rather to a lack of knowledge and information regarding digital technology. The integration of new technologies in the cultural organization of providing psychiatric care is therefore a real challenge. It is not a question of replacing caregivers, but rather of increasing their efficiency. This imposes a reflection on the definition and evaluation of these tools, but also on the level of training necessary for their use. The evaluation of these tools is in essence multiple, since it involves different actors, each with their own frame of reference. Health professionals refer to an evidence-based methodology, based in most cases on studies that respect standards set by the scientific community and evaluated by peers. Developers refer to processes with design standards, development processes and norms to be respected. Finally, users rely mainly on so-called external resources, which can be expert or non-expert opinions (comments on websites, tutorials from influencers, videos of opinions or comparisons). The evolution and complexity of the technologies used therefore require adapted and above all integrative evaluation models. In this article, we will first review the current challenges of using digital tools in mental health and specify the doctrines of the different authorities involved at the national level in their development. Secondly, we will formulate a definition of these different digital tools. Thirdly, after having specified the elements on which the concept of the digital medical device is based, which will allow us to propose scientifically proven tools, we will offer current and future criteria for their evaluation, based in particular on the notion of acceptability. The overall objective is therefore to provide users with the necessary reference points for the constitution of a theoretical framework for the optimal use of digital technology in psychiatry." @default.
- W4328101199 created "2023-03-22" @default.
- W4328101199 creator A5018075581 @default.
- W4328101199 creator A5030749678 @default.
- W4328101199 creator A5032762694 @default.
- W4328101199 creator A5040118342 @default.
- W4328101199 creator A5046155110 @default.
- W4328101199 creator A5050706969 @default.
- W4328101199 creator A5058327924 @default.
- W4328101199 creator A5065016689 @default.
- W4328101199 creator A5073141247 @default.
- W4328101199 creator A5076389373 @default.
- W4328101199 date "2023-03-01" @default.
- W4328101199 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W4328101199 title "Les applications numériques en santé mentale : état des lieux, enjeux et perspectives" @default.
- W4328101199 cites W1990613449 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2106122852 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2128900442 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2339369942 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2561359507 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2605602096 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2765424800 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2890502762 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2894656887 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2907007935 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2972804789 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W2999080334 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W3020855431 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W3043096756 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W3045841993 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W3107800523 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W3109512724 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W3121831031 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W3154812833 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W3163257149 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W3209945287 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W3212714689 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W4281765402 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W4282823283 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W4282825121 @default.
- W4328101199 cites W4285512313 @default.
- W4328101199 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2022.12.015" @default.
- W4328101199 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4328101199 type Work @default.
- W4328101199 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4328101199 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4328101199 hasAuthorship W4328101199A5018075581 @default.
- W4328101199 hasAuthorship W4328101199A5030749678 @default.
- W4328101199 hasAuthorship W4328101199A5032762694 @default.
- W4328101199 hasAuthorship W4328101199A5040118342 @default.
- W4328101199 hasAuthorship W4328101199A5046155110 @default.
- W4328101199 hasAuthorship W4328101199A5050706969 @default.
- W4328101199 hasAuthorship W4328101199A5058327924 @default.
- W4328101199 hasAuthorship W4328101199A5065016689 @default.
- W4328101199 hasAuthorship W4328101199A5073141247 @default.
- W4328101199 hasAuthorship W4328101199A5076389373 @default.
- W4328101199 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W4328101199 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
- W4328101199 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4328101199 hasConceptScore W4328101199C138885662 @default.
- W4328101199 hasConceptScore W4328101199C15708023 @default.
- W4328101199 hasConceptScore W4328101199C17744445 @default.
- W4328101199 hasLocation W43281011991 @default.
- W4328101199 hasOpenAccess W4328101199 @default.
- W4328101199 hasPrimaryLocation W43281011991 @default.
- W4328101199 hasRelatedWork W11365241 @default.
- W4328101199 hasRelatedWork W1589203209 @default.
- W4328101199 hasRelatedWork W2557454913 @default.
- W4328101199 hasRelatedWork W2603296253 @default.
- W4328101199 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W4328101199 hasRelatedWork W2888947023 @default.
- W4328101199 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W4328101199 hasRelatedWork W3003325775 @default.
- W4328101199 hasRelatedWork W828925460 @default.
- W4328101199 hasRelatedWork W93312527 @default.
- W4328101199 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4328101199 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4328101199 workType "article" @default.