FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W43594340> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W43594340 abstract "The paper opens with a report of studies carried out on natural father and stepfather incestuous families, and this opens up the issue of the appropriateness of both types of research methodologies. Differences found in the types of incest, and responses of families to treatment, illustrate findings that would not have been uncovered had either methodology been used to the exclusion of the other. The argument is made that the dichotomization of quantitative and qualitative techniques is both misleading and unnecessary. The methodological issues are rather ones of judgment about what will yield needed information in a given investigation. The paper gives some attention too, to the related issue of which methodological approaches are appropriate when a fresh line of inquiry is beginning in a field; and mention is made of an obvious issue that arises in dealing with incest -the handling of sensitive research problems. The purpose of this paper iu to illustrate how the combined use of qualitative and quantitative methods were necessary in obtaining a clearer understanding of the process of incest within this society. The contention is that the use of one methodology at the exclusion of the other would not only have reduced the results but would have actually obscured important information. Each method raised questions that were then pursued by the other. The debate in the literature about the epistemological basis of these two methodologies has been persistent. (Smith & Heshusiust 1986) Not infrequently they have been dichotomized, with the apparent assumption that the epistemological differences force researchers to choose one or the other accepting the imputed advantages of one with a loss of the imputed advantages of the other. My position is that we can, and often need to combine methods, shifting frames of reference between the two orientations. Like Goetz and Le Compte, / do not see the two as mutually exclusive dichotomies. (1984:7) The study / talk about here is an example of generating propositions through qualitative means, verifying them quantitatively, and moving back again to qualitative methods in order to build a coherent and understandable picture of the phenomena under study. The problem was to find out what incest is and to identify the systems of meaning surrounding this particular rule violation. The study was to be an ethnographic account of the process of incest within this society. The first task was to identify a sufficient number of discovered cases of incest sc that the participants and others in" @default.
• W43594340 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W43594340 creator A5062451575 @default.
• W43594340 date "1986-04-01" @default.
• W43594340 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W43594340 title "The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Studying Incest in America." @default.
• W43594340 hasPublicationYear "1986" @default.
• W43594340 type Work @default.
• W43594340 sameAs 43594340 @default.
• W43594340 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W43594340 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W43594340 hasAuthorship W43594340A5062451575 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W43594340 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C111472728 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C126322002 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C138885662 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C144024400 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C15744967 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C190248442 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C202444582 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C33923547 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C36289849 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C71924100 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C9652623 @default.
• W43594340 hasConceptScore W43594340C98184364 @default.
• W43594340 hasLocation W435943401 @default.
• W43594340 hasOpenAccess W43594340 @default.
• W43594340 hasPrimaryLocation W435943401 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W1795195674 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W1972931826 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W1986059251 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2085081981 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2118146027 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2150741430 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2165002234 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2182486910 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2186550535 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2253253713 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2343774752 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2618996752 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2768388552 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2946563880 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2954039997 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W2979339694 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W3121291967 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W3204638426 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W610607352 @default.
• W43594340 hasRelatedWork W633071465 @default.
• W43594340 isParatext "false" @default.
• W43594340 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W43594340 magId "43594340" @default.
• W43594340 workType "article" @default.