FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4360605469> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4360605469 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP70-16 IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH AN UPPER TRACT URINARY STONE OF LESS THAN 2 CM IN DIAMETER, DOES URETEROSCOPY COMPARED TO SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY IMPROVE THE STONE-FREE RATE? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS FROM THE EAU UROLITHIASIS PANNEL Robert Geraghty, Riccardo Lombardo, Lazaros Tzelves, Niall F Davis, Andreas Neisius, Ales Petřík, Giovanni Gambaro, Helene Ulrik Jung, Andreas Skolarikos, Thomas Tailly, and Bhaskar Somani Robert GeraghtyRobert Geraghty More articles by this author , Riccardo LombardoRiccardo Lombardo More articles by this author , Lazaros TzelvesLazaros Tzelves More articles by this author , Niall F DavisNiall F Davis More articles by this author , Andreas NeisiusAndreas Neisius More articles by this author , Ales PetříkAles Petřík More articles by this author , Giovanni GambaroGiovanni Gambaro More articles by this author , Helene Ulrik JungHelene Ulrik Jung More articles by this author , Andreas SkolarikosAndreas Skolarikos More articles by this author , Thomas TaillyThomas Tailly More articles by this author , and Bhaskar SomaniBhaskar Somani More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003338.16AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To determine which treatment between ureteroscopy (RIRS) and shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) has a better stone free rate in paediatric patients (<18 years) with upper tract stones (<2 cm) METHODS: Using PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database, we identified studies published until August 2022 reporting surgical outcomes of paediatrics patients undergoing ULT and ESWL with renal stone < 2 cm. Protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. Only comparative studies were considered for analysis. Stone free rate, operative time and complications were analyzed. Review manager was used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 7 studies were included in the analysis and out of them three were randomized clinical trials. A total of 786 patients were analyzed. Mean age ranged from 6.5 to 11.5 years. The ESWL group presented a range of stone free rates between 20 and 90% while the RIRS group presented a range of stone free rates between 37 and 97%. The meta-analysis of the three randomized clinical trials favored the RIRS group over the ESWL group in terms of stone-free rate (RR: 0.84; p<0,05) (Figure). Only four studies included complication rate and rates were comparable between both groups. In terms of operative time only four studies included data and most of them favored ESWL over RIRS (Figure). Source of Funding: none © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e1010 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Robert Geraghty More articles by this author Riccardo Lombardo More articles by this author Lazaros Tzelves More articles by this author Niall F Davis More articles by this author Andreas Neisius More articles by this author Ales Petřík More articles by this author Giovanni Gambaro More articles by this author Helene Ulrik Jung More articles by this author Andreas Skolarikos More articles by this author Thomas Tailly More articles by this author Bhaskar Somani More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W4360605469 created "2023-03-24" @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5004023406 @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5020657630 @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5026025591 @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5031439330 @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5038826691 @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5044135100 @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5059938054 @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5061713287 @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5078671950 @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5083756576 @default.
• W4360605469 creator A5087569213 @default.
• W4360605469 date "2023-04-01" @default.
• W4360605469 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4360605469 title "MP70-16 IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH AN UPPER TRACT URINARY STONE OF LESS THAN 2 CM IN DIAMETER, DOES URETEROSCOPY COMPARED TO SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY IMPROVE THE STONE-FREE RATE? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS FROM THE EAU UROLITHIASIS PANNEL" @default.
• W4360605469 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000003338.16" @default.
• W4360605469 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4360605469 type Work @default.
• W4360605469 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4360605469 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5004023406 @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5020657630 @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5026025591 @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5031439330 @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5038826691 @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5044135100 @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5059938054 @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5061713287 @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5078671950 @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5083756576 @default.
• W4360605469 hasAuthorship W4360605469A5087569213 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConcept C2777950166 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConcept C2780653459 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConcept C2993461684 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConcept C3018013779 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConceptScore W4360605469C126322002 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConceptScore W4360605469C141071460 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConceptScore W4360605469C2776664737 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConceptScore W4360605469C2777950166 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConceptScore W4360605469C2780653459 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConceptScore W4360605469C2993461684 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConceptScore W4360605469C3018013779 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConceptScore W4360605469C61434518 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConceptScore W4360605469C71924100 @default.
• W4360605469 hasConceptScore W4360605469C77411442 @default.
• W4360605469 hasIssue "Supplement 4" @default.
• W4360605469 hasLocation W43606054691 @default.
• W4360605469 hasOpenAccess W4360605469 @default.
• W4360605469 hasPrimaryLocation W43606054691 @default.
• W4360605469 hasRelatedWork W2014849002 @default.
• W4360605469 hasRelatedWork W2020014267 @default.
• W4360605469 hasRelatedWork W2041022781 @default.
• W4360605469 hasRelatedWork W2401553132 @default.
• W4360605469 hasRelatedWork W2405020030 @default.
• W4360605469 hasRelatedWork W2902826923 @default.
• W4360605469 hasRelatedWork W3028620077 @default.
• W4360605469 hasRelatedWork W3030892227 @default.
• W4360605469 hasRelatedWork W4297833320 @default.
• W4360605469 hasRelatedWork W4319927879 @default.
• W4360605469 hasVolume "209" @default.
• W4360605469 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4360605469 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4360605469 workType "article" @default.