FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4360607311> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4360607311 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP47-16 MICROWAVE ABLATION VERSUS PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR SMALL RENAL MASSES Jessica Qiu, Emmett H. Kennady, Chris Ballantyne, Clinton Yeaman, John Morgan, Anthony Denovio, Matthew B. Clements, J. Patrick Mershon, Iman Richie, Tracey L Krupski, Noah S. Schenkman, and Jennifer M. Lobo Jessica QiuJessica Qiu More articles by this author , Emmett H. KennadyEmmett H. Kennady More articles by this author , Chris BallantyneChris Ballantyne More articles by this author , Clinton YeamanClinton Yeaman More articles by this author , John MorganJohn Morgan More articles by this author , Anthony DenovioAnthony Denovio More articles by this author , Matthew B. ClementsMatthew B. Clements More articles by this author , J. Patrick MershonJ. Patrick Mershon More articles by this author , Iman RichieIman Richie More articles by this author , Tracey L KrupskiTracey L Krupski More articles by this author , Noah S. SchenkmanNoah S. Schenkman More articles by this author , and Jennifer M. LoboJennifer M. Lobo More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003293.16AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Thermal ablation (TA) is a widely accepted approach for T1a renal masses < 3 cm in size, with a gap in research of masses sized 3-4 cm. While much literature focuses on radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as the primary TA modality, a growing body of literature is showing the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA). In this study we aim to compare the oncological and renal function outcomes of MWA compared to partial nephrectomy (PN) in two small renal mass (SRM) tumor size groups, <3 cm and 3-4 cm. METHODS: This study included retrospective data from 2009-2015 and prospective data since 2015 from a single-institution database. Patient demographics, renal mass characteristics, and treatment outcomes were collected. Survival curves and hazard analysis were used to assess oncological outcomes. Changes in eGFR and CKD stage following surgery were used to assess renal function outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 91 PN and 130 MWA patients matched the inclusion criteria. For both tumor sizes, median age and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of MWA patients were greater than PN, while median length of stay was shorter . No difference in local recurrence free survival was found between treatment modalities on survival analysis for masses < 3 cm (p=0.56) and sized 3-4 cm (p=0.15). No difference in local recurrence free survival was found between treatment modalities on hazard analysis for masses < 3 cm (p=0.56) and sized 3-4 cm (p=0.70). Pre-operative renal function was significantly lower in patients undergoing MWA for both tumor sizes, however there was no significant difference in the post-operative change in renal function between MWA and PN for tumors up to 4 cm. CONCLUSIONS: While MWA patients are older and have more comorbidities, oncological outcomes and renal preservation were comparable between MWA and PN for SRMs < 3 cm and 3-4 cm. Our findings suggest that MWA can be used as a safe and effective alternative to PN for SRM tumors up to 4 cm. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e650 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jessica Qiu More articles by this author Emmett H. Kennady More articles by this author Chris Ballantyne More articles by this author Clinton Yeaman More articles by this author John Morgan More articles by this author Anthony Denovio More articles by this author Matthew B. Clements More articles by this author J. Patrick Mershon More articles by this author Iman Richie More articles by this author Tracey L Krupski More articles by this author Noah S. Schenkman More articles by this author Jennifer M. Lobo More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W4360607311 created "2023-03-24" @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5014797343 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5044569132 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5045348864 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5046317543 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5046653328 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5053280104 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5061273365 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5063181707 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5065748526 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5067091290 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5068055917 @default.
• W4360607311 creator A5079731544 @default.
• W4360607311 date "2023-04-01" @default.
• W4360607311 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W4360607311 title "MP47-16 MICROWAVE ABLATION VERSUS PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR SMALL RENAL MASSES" @default.
• W4360607311 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000003293.16" @default.
• W4360607311 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4360607311 type Work @default.
• W4360607311 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4360607311 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5014797343 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5044569132 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5045348864 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5046317543 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5046653328 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5053280104 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5061273365 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5063181707 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5065748526 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5067091290 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5068055917 @default.
• W4360607311 hasAuthorship W4360607311A5079731544 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConcept C2778014663 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConcept C2778902805 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConcept C2780227381 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConcept C2992234517 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConceptScore W4360607311C126322002 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConceptScore W4360607311C2778014663 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConceptScore W4360607311C2778902805 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConceptScore W4360607311C2780091579 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConceptScore W4360607311C2780227381 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConceptScore W4360607311C2992234517 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConceptScore W4360607311C61434518 @default.
• W4360607311 hasConceptScore W4360607311C71924100 @default.
• W4360607311 hasIssue "Supplement 4" @default.
• W4360607311 hasLocation W43606073111 @default.
• W4360607311 hasOpenAccess W4360607311 @default.
• W4360607311 hasPrimaryLocation W43606073111 @default.
• W4360607311 hasRelatedWork W1995531088 @default.
• W4360607311 hasRelatedWork W2088225065 @default.
• W4360607311 hasRelatedWork W2529328917 @default.
• W4360607311 hasRelatedWork W2614447550 @default.
• W4360607311 hasRelatedWork W2952967919 @default.
• W4360607311 hasRelatedWork W2987553015 @default.
• W4360607311 hasRelatedWork W2990178711 @default.
• W4360607311 hasRelatedWork W4210988141 @default.
• W4360607311 hasRelatedWork W4281730969 @default.
• W4360607311 hasRelatedWork W4309514680 @default.
• W4360607311 hasVolume "209" @default.
• W4360607311 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4360607311 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4360607311 workType "article" @default.