FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4360978178> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4360978178 endingPage "340" @default.
• W4360978178 startingPage "334" @default.
• W4360978178 abstract "Reviewed by: Blind in Early Modern Japan: Disability, Medicine, and Identity by Wei Yu Wayne Tan Gerald Groemer Blind in Early Modern Japan: Disability, Medicine, and Identity. By Wei Yu Wayne Tan. University of Michigan Press, 2022. 266 pages. ISBN: 9780472075485 (hardcover; also available as softcover and e-book). It will surprise few readers of this journal to hear that men and women with visual disabilities played a major role in the development of early modern Japanese culture. Visually impaired men recited Tale of the Heike and other narratives (as they had since medieval times); composed the bulk of the koto repertory; created countless songs with shamisen accompaniment; served as acupuncturists, masseurs, moneylenders, and scholars; and engaged in innumerable other professions. Especially in western and southern provinces, visually disabled biwa-playing priests or monks (mōsō) cultivated and performed their own genres of narrative and song. Visually disabled women worked as musicians (goze), folk-religious healers, and shamans and created and performed a variety of sung and narrative genres that they diffused to every region of the land. Excellent Japanese-language studies of the blind men's guild (tōdō), of goze and mōsō organizations, and of the arts and activities of visually disabled individuals have been available for decades. In Western languages, scholars including Susan Matisoff, Ingrid Fritsch, Hugh de Ferranti, Alison Tokita, Maren Ehlers, and myself have published many papers, book chapters, and monographs on the subject. In the study under review, based on a 2015 dissertation submitted to Harvard University, Wei Yu Wayne Tan sets out to present a more complete picture of visual disability in early modern Japan. This is a laudable effort, and several chapters of the book shed welcome light on regions that have not yet been adequately illuminated in Western-language research. [End Page 334] But first, who is to count as the subject of a book titled Blind in Early Modern Japan? Who in Edo-period Japan was considered blind? This cannot be determined outside of its specific historical and cultural context and requires examining the society within which the language and criteria for identification and categorization are situated. Tan is of course aware of this and assures the reader that his use of the term blind people foregrounds the experience and identity of blind people and also reflects the references in historical sources (p. xiv). Yet since Edo-period Japanese did not use English, the notion that certain persons considered themselves blind people thanks to their experience and self-identification as blind people is either false or tautological. Early modern Japanese with visual disabilities did not, in truth, identify or experience themselves as blind people at all. Rather, they described themselves as zatō, kengyō, goze, oyakata, zamoto, or the like when they spoke of their attributed social status or their position in an occupational collective; as mekura (dark-eyed—today a discriminatory term), me ga warui (eyes are bad), me ga mienai (eyes cannot see), or the like when explaining their impairment or disability; as masseur or biwa player when referring to their occupation; as father or son when relating their family situation; or as poor or wealthy when considering their economic position in society. This clutter of categories and self-identifications obviously presents a problem for a writer wishing to represent what being blind in early modern Japan was all about, and Tan wisely recognizes that blind people, however defined, constitutes a crowd far too large and heterogeneous to be adequately covered in one monograph. Instead of seeking to include anyone and everyone who could be counted as somehow visually impaired, Tan focuses on the largely subjective claim of disabled identity (p. 5) and on the notion of status identity, which seeks to combine the objectivity of social status—something Tan too simplistically maintains was defined by occupation (p. 7)—with a notion of identity that hovers between a social attribution and an individual choice. The two concepts are interrelated because Tan defines blind status identity as a disabled identity tied to membership in the Kyoto guild (p. 9). Blind people in early modern Japan cannot, however, be defined on the basis of guild membership, because such membership was..." @default.
• W4360978178 created "2023-03-30" @default.
• W4360978178 creator A5042745221 @default.
• W4360978178 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4360978178 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W4360978178 title "Blind in Early Modern Japan: Disability, Medicine, and Identity by Wei Yu Wayne Tan" @default.
• W4360978178 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/mni.2022.0055" @default.
• W4360978178 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4360978178 type Work @default.
• W4360978178 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4360978178 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4360978178 hasAuthorship W4360978178A5042745221 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C2778355321 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C2780343955 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C70789860 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C107038049 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C124952713 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C142362112 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C153349607 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C15744967 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C161191863 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C199033989 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C2777855551 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C2778355321 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C2780343955 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C41008148 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C70789860 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C77805123 @default.
• W4360978178 hasConceptScore W4360978178C95457728 @default.
• W4360978178 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4360978178 hasLocation W43609781781 @default.
• W4360978178 hasOpenAccess W4360978178 @default.
• W4360978178 hasPrimaryLocation W43609781781 @default.
• W4360978178 hasRelatedWork W1996124091 @default.
• W4360978178 hasRelatedWork W1996622185 @default.
• W4360978178 hasRelatedWork W2266905065 @default.
• W4360978178 hasRelatedWork W2391675264 @default.
• W4360978178 hasRelatedWork W2393941505 @default.
• W4360978178 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4360978178 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4360978178 hasRelatedWork W3117353092 @default.
• W4360978178 hasRelatedWork W3117524241 @default.
• W4360978178 hasRelatedWork W4220700322 @default.
• W4360978178 hasVolume "77" @default.
• W4360978178 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4360978178 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4360978178 workType "article" @default.