FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4360984953> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4360984953 endingPage "735" @default.
• W4360984953 startingPage "689" @default.
• W4360984953 abstract "Supreme Court Full Bench Decision 2019Do2037 on April 21 2022 dealt with statutory interpretation of Military Criminal Act Article 92-6 which states that a person who commits an indecent act such as anal intercourse with any military personnel shall be punished by imprisonment with labor for not more than 2 years. The court overruled it’s prior ruling by declaring that the Article shall not be construed to include acts taking place in private places with mutual consent. It is of utmost importance to note that this case was decided against the background of Constitutional Court Decision 2012Hun-Ba258, July 28 2016 which held that ‘an indecent act’ of the Article is not void for vagueness and does not violate complaint’s right to sexual self determination, right to privacy, and personal liberty. Aforementioned Supreme Court Case provides a valuable opportunity to look into how the court should consider Human Rights in statutory interpretation, in other words, what the structure and function of Human Rights conforming interpretation consists of. This study suggests that Human Rights conforming interpretation is an interpretative principle that can be derived from requirements of Constitution conforming interpretation(verfassungskonforme Gesetzesauslegung) and respect for international law as provided by Artcle 6 (1) of the Constitution. Understood as an interpretative mandate guided by the fundamental rights and international human rights norms, it requires that the meaning given by the mandate should be preferred even if the initial meaning without consideration of the mandate is not identical with the former. As such, it can be characterized as micro-level, as well as weak-form of judicial review(as formulated by Mark Tushnet). The determining factors in Human Rights conforming interpretation can be summarized as the following: 1) whether multiple interpretations can be legitimately presented within the boundaries of the statutory language, 2) what is the nature of the doubt regarding rights violation, and 3) when such interpretation should be adopted in relation to the referral to the Constitutional Court. The Supreme Court Decision provides multiple opinions addressing these issues. The dissenting opinion differed from other opinions in stating that there are no multiple interpretations possible within the boundaries of the given statutory text. The court’s opinion and the separate opinions 1, 2 all agreed that other possible interpretations were available but disagreed on what those versions actually were. The right to sexual self determination and equal treatment violations were well argued by the court’s opinion, but it would be more adequate to consider it to be an establishment of legitimate doubt on rights violation rather than the final judgment as the Constitutional Court would present its rulings. Human Rights conforming interpretation requires a disciplined sense of interpretive practice as well as an understanding that statutory interpretations operate in a sphere closely related to the goals of respect, protection and fulfillment of Human Rights. Provided that these conditions are met, it might be able to secure a middle ground standing inbetween democratic legislative process and strong form constitutional review." @default.
• W4360984953 created "2023-03-30" @default.
• W4360984953 creator A5025652564 @default.
• W4360984953 date "2022-12-30" @default.
• W4360984953 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W4360984953 title "On Human Rights Conforming Statutory Interpretation of the Judiciary: Regarding Supreme Court Full Bench Decision 2019Do2037 on April 21 2022" @default.
• W4360984953 doi "https://doi.org/10.35901/kjcl.2022.28.4.689" @default.
• W4360984953 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4360984953 type Work @default.
• W4360984953 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4360984953 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4360984953 hasAuthorship W4360984953A5025652564 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C2775884135 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C2779204856 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C2780219900 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConcept C95691615 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C138885662 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C144024400 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C158129432 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C169437150 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C17744445 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C199539241 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C2775884135 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C2776154427 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C2778272461 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C2779204856 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C2780219900 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C41895202 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C527412718 @default.
• W4360984953 hasConceptScore W4360984953C95691615 @default.
• W4360984953 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4360984953 hasLocation W43609849531 @default.
• W4360984953 hasOpenAccess W4360984953 @default.
• W4360984953 hasPrimaryLocation W43609849531 @default.
• W4360984953 hasRelatedWork W1828238766 @default.
• W4360984953 hasRelatedWork W2266140966 @default.
• W4360984953 hasRelatedWork W2293349474 @default.
• W4360984953 hasRelatedWork W3122818564 @default.
• W4360984953 hasRelatedWork W3125569848 @default.
• W4360984953 hasRelatedWork W3125897387 @default.
• W4360984953 hasRelatedWork W351477259 @default.
• W4360984953 hasRelatedWork W4313489573 @default.
• W4360984953 hasRelatedWork W650454968 @default.
• W4360984953 hasRelatedWork W80222186 @default.
• W4360984953 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W4360984953 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4360984953 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4360984953 workType "article" @default.