FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4361001486> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4361001486 abstract "Cooperation has been key to our success as a species. Cooperative behavior on multiple levels and the structures that emerge from those interactions have been extending over different domains and scopes, from small food-sharing networks among hunter-gatherers to global trade and the generation and diffusion of knowledge and technology worldwide. Groups and societies have been creating and changing increasingly complex social mechanisms and institutions to allow, promote, and support cooperation and its scaling. All these efforts have boosted and expanded the benefits of cooperation but also have increased our interdependence between different actors, which also implies higher systemic risks. Cooperative Networks in small groups are the essential building blocks to sustain and promote large-scale cooperation. Moreover, large-scale cooperation is possibly our best chance to face today’s most significant global challenges and threats, such as climate change and global pandemics. Schools are crucial for human development. Here, we first face peers and learn how to cooperate with strangers. The school’s main goals are socialization, the transmission of culture, and teaching knowledge and skills. Classrooms, in many ways, have a similar tribe-like structure and a nested and controlled general situation, so dynamic cooperative networks emerge and mutate. Two main challenges for schools nowadays are about learning and well-being. In specific, how can we improve learning and achievement? And, how can we make school a safer, bullying-free place? Cooperative learning literature has consistently found that creating more cooperative learning environments has causal effects on increased academic achievement and decreased bullying behavior. However, no precise mechanism is known. So, our main research question over this work is the following: How cooperative networks in the classroom relate with other educational outcomes, particularly Academic Achievement and Bullying Behavior? But, how can we measure cooperation in the class, and elicit these networks? We propose that we can use experimental Game Theory, specifically implementing in the field an adaptation of a lab game-theoretic social dilemma, which try to reproduce with ecological similarities the tension between individual interests and social efficiency that students face in real life everyday interactions in the classroom. The essential concept is External Validity. We expect that the student’s behavior in the game will reflect their day-to-day behavior and classroom structure. The dyadic social dilemma we implement is a modified version of the Prisoner’s dilemma. A major adjustment is that in this game, students are aware of the partner’s identity that has been matched to them each round, i.e., the game is non-anonymous. Thereby, their choices when playing again each other are not only the result of intrinsic prosocial dispositions (or their absence), but also the result of their history and the perceptions they have about each other. In the first chapter, our first draft paper tackles the relationship between cooperative network topology and academic performance. We measured the cooperative centrality of students by quantifying their deviations from the average level of reciprocal cooperation in each interaction and found that students that engaged in high levels of reciprocal cooperation have significantly higher GPAs. In the second chapter, our second draft paper characterized the relationship between cooperative network topology and bullying subtypes. We categorized students on their bullying involvement in four different social categories: bully, bully-victim, victim, and non-involved students. Then, we use the data from the experiment combined with a self-report instrument and using multilevel modeling, we study how bullies, victims and bully-victims differ in their access to the elicited cooperative network. We found that bully/victims and victims tend to receive less tokens than non-involved students. Both articles have important policy implications to the extent that they can inform the design of interventions in the early phases of education to improve both academic achievement and social coexistence" @default.
• W4361001486 created "2023-03-30" @default.
• W4361001486 creator A5048982987 @default.
• W4361001486 date "2023-03-27" @default.
• W4361001486 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W4361001486 title "Using experimental game theory to measure cooperative relations in elementary school classrooms to understand its relationship with academic performance and school climate" @default.
• W4361001486 doi "https://doi.org/10.52611/11447/6151" @default.
• W4361001486 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4361001486 type Work @default.
• W4361001486 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4361001486 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W4361001486 hasAuthorship W4361001486A5048982987 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C25032326 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C2780191437 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C51672120 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C79416737 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConcept C88610354 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C145420912 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C15744967 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C17744445 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C205649164 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C25032326 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C2778755073 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C2780191437 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C39549134 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C41008148 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C51672120 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C56739046 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C58640448 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C77805123 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C79416737 @default.
• W4361001486 hasConceptScore W4361001486C88610354 @default.
• W4361001486 hasLocation W43610014861 @default.
• W4361001486 hasOpenAccess W4361001486 @default.
• W4361001486 hasPrimaryLocation W43610014861 @default.
• W4361001486 hasRelatedWork W1588079790 @default.
• W4361001486 hasRelatedWork W1709166954 @default.
• W4361001486 hasRelatedWork W1992871012 @default.
• W4361001486 hasRelatedWork W1999450046 @default.
• W4361001486 hasRelatedWork W2068334897 @default.
• W4361001486 hasRelatedWork W2111098615 @default.
• W4361001486 hasRelatedWork W2115001612 @default.
• W4361001486 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4361001486 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4361001486 hasRelatedWork W3033386983 @default.
• W4361001486 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4361001486 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4361001486 workType "dissertation" @default.