FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4361247739> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4361247739 endingPage "1419" @default.
• W4361247739 startingPage "1412" @default.
• W4361247739 abstract "Background Interscalene nerve blocks and local anesthetic infiltration are 2 methods commonly used in multimodal analgesia regimens for shoulder arthroplasty. Liposomal bupivacaine is a novel anesthetic that can be detected more than 24 hours following local administration. Studies comparing liposomal bupivacaine with conventional analgesic methods have found mixed results regarding pain and narcotic consumption, and there is little information available regarding patient satisfaction and the role of psychosocial variables. Methods This is a randomized study of 76 adult patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty who were assigned to receive a preoperative interscalene nerve block with ropivacaine (Block = 38) or an intraoperative periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine (Local = 38). The primary outcomes were narcotic consumption (MEq, morphine equivalents), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and satisfaction (0-10). The secondary outcomes were the effect of patient group preference (Block vs. Local) and psychosocial variables (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Brief Resilience Scale) on satisfaction. Length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, and the number of narcotic refills were tracked from the day of surgery through the first postoperative appointment, which was routinely 7-14 days following surgery. Results Intraoperative and day 0 narcotic consumption was lower in the Block group by 17.3 and 21.6 MEq (P < .001, P = .035) with no differences on day 1 or 2. There was no difference in VAS pain scores, length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, or the number of narcotic refills. Patient satisfaction was higher in the Block group (8.3 vs. 6.8, P = .017). Pain catastrophizing, resilience, and patient group preference did not have any significant relationship with patient satisfaction. Conclusion Patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty have higher satisfaction with a conventional interscalene block compared to a periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine. There were no clinically important differences in narcotic consumption, VAS pain scores, length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, or the number of narcotic refills. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, and patient preferences did not have any relationship with patient satisfaction. Interscalene nerve blocks and local anesthetic infiltration are 2 methods commonly used in multimodal analgesia regimens for shoulder arthroplasty. Liposomal bupivacaine is a novel anesthetic that can be detected more than 24 hours following local administration. Studies comparing liposomal bupivacaine with conventional analgesic methods have found mixed results regarding pain and narcotic consumption, and there is little information available regarding patient satisfaction and the role of psychosocial variables. This is a randomized study of 76 adult patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty who were assigned to receive a preoperative interscalene nerve block with ropivacaine (Block = 38) or an intraoperative periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine (Local = 38). The primary outcomes were narcotic consumption (MEq, morphine equivalents), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and satisfaction (0-10). The secondary outcomes were the effect of patient group preference (Block vs. Local) and psychosocial variables (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Brief Resilience Scale) on satisfaction. Length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, and the number of narcotic refills were tracked from the day of surgery through the first postoperative appointment, which was routinely 7-14 days following surgery. Intraoperative and day 0 narcotic consumption was lower in the Block group by 17.3 and 21.6 MEq (P < .001, P = .035) with no differences on day 1 or 2. There was no difference in VAS pain scores, length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, or the number of narcotic refills. Patient satisfaction was higher in the Block group (8.3 vs. 6.8, P = .017). Pain catastrophizing, resilience, and patient group preference did not have any significant relationship with patient satisfaction. Patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty have higher satisfaction with a conventional interscalene block compared to a periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine. There were no clinically important differences in narcotic consumption, VAS pain scores, length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, or the number of narcotic refills. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, and patient preferences did not have any relationship with patient satisfaction." @default.
• W4361247739 created "2023-03-31" @default.
• W4361247739 creator A5015142038 @default.
• W4361247739 creator A5069523242 @default.
• W4361247739 creator A5071400055 @default.
• W4361247739 creator A5073299118 @default.
• W4361247739 date "2023-07-01" @default.
• W4361247739 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4361247739 title "Interscalene block vs. periarticular liposomal bupivacaine for pain control following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized trial" @default.
• W4361247739 cites W1969305658 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W1977976777 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2032541700 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2033989448 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2037557484 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2046188128 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2102797406 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2160662805 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2474663030 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2604914616 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2746640054 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2792168591 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2892688444 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W2988365395 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W3025729728 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W3046207593 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W3092030651 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W3128187830 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W3132929549 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W3133417232 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W3158030934 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W3178652836 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W4213310775 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W4214849423 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W4224315977 @default.
• W4361247739 cites W4229335155 @default.
• W4361247739 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.137" @default.
• W4361247739 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37003430" @default.
• W4361247739 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4361247739 type Work @default.
• W4361247739 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4361247739 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4361247739 hasAuthorship W4361247739A5015142038 @default.
• W4361247739 hasAuthorship W4361247739A5069523242 @default.
• W4361247739 hasAuthorship W4361247739A5071400055 @default.
• W4361247739 hasAuthorship W4361247739A5073299118 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C2775849661 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C2777197265 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C2777389121 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C2778994108 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C2780269707 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C2780820201 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C2781328992 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C141071460 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C14184104 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C168563851 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C2775849661 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C2775944032 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C2777197265 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C2777389121 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C2778336525 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C2778994108 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C2780269707 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C2780820201 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C2781328992 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C42219234 @default.
• W4361247739 hasConceptScore W4361247739C71924100 @default.
• W4361247739 hasFunder F4320310256 @default.
• W4361247739 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W4361247739 hasLocation W43612477391 @default.
• W4361247739 hasLocation W43612477392 @default.
• W4361247739 hasOpenAccess W4361247739 @default.
• W4361247739 hasPrimaryLocation W43612477391 @default.
• W4361247739 hasRelatedWork W2005144780 @default.
• W4361247739 hasRelatedWork W2013575488 @default.
• W4361247739 hasRelatedWork W2051724199 @default.
• W4361247739 hasRelatedWork W2051899112 @default.
• W4361247739 hasRelatedWork W2090632287 @default.
• W4361247739 hasRelatedWork W2160611829 @default.
• W4361247739 hasRelatedWork W2355760105 @default.
• W4361247739 hasRelatedWork W2410458131 @default.
• W4361247739 hasRelatedWork W4247450932 @default.
• W4361247739 hasRelatedWork W4361247739 @default.
• W4361247739 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W4361247739 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4361247739 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4361247739 workType "article" @default.