FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4361269148> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4361269148 endingPage "964" @default.
• W4361269148 startingPage "963" @default.
• W4361269148 abstract "The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) are responding jointly to this request for information. SAEM and ACEP promote innovative and imaginative strategy development that will transform prehospital and emergent patient care. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) proposal to modify the current grant scoring system to prioritize these principles is a welcome change and we are supportive of these efforts. Focusing on research importance, feasibility, and scientific rigor will make it easier to interpret reviewer critiques and provide investigators with clearer information on score driving factors related to the science itself. While investigator and environment are important factors for successfully conducting research, reducing their overall importance may help with reducing bias and expanding the pool of meritorious applications. We also support combining significance and innovation into a single “importance” score, as the current format gives equal weight to innovation even though related sections tend to be brief. Furthermore, the existing significance section focuses largely on perceived need and scientific rationale with lesser consideration of the true magnitude of impact. Our societies are hopeful that by broadening the concept of overall importance, this new section can better weight funding decisions toward injuries and illnesses where improved outcomes would benefit the greatest number of people. We also agree that the current scoring system overly emphasizes an investigator's prior grant success and institutional reputation in determining an application's merit. Reliance on these factors detracts from the proposal's true “importance” and may perpetuate existing and ongoing challenges with the development and retention of junior investigators, including investigators from historically underrepresented groups. The proposed changes in this area will allow for increased emphasis on the development of highly novel or paradigm-shifting approaches to problems. Nonetheless, consideration of the capacity to execute the proposed work remains a critically important factor. The proposed method of scoring using a descriptive range of “fully capable” to “additional resources needed” deemphasizes quantitative scoring and we believe accomplishes the stated goals. However, we recommend specific clarification that the proposed scale reflects the entirety of the investigatory team (with due consideration of experience with prior collaboration). An important component of the current scoring system not addressed in the proposed changes is the handling of grant resubmissions. It is not clear why resubmissions have a written narrative that is score-driving and subject to bias. We recommend amending this process for each additional criteria to be marked yes or no as to “all major/moderate concerns appropriately addressed.” Reviewers could also have the option of describing “any new major/moderate concerns identified” in the resubmission process. Finally, while we recognize that these scoring revisions are important, we suggest that the NIH consider a more direct acknowledgment of our nation's need to fund a diverse pool of grant applicants. We believe the approach of the three-factor scoring system that emphasizes capability to perform the work is well aligned with this goal, but we would encourage the NIH to consider an explicit acknowledgment of ongoing disparities in our nation's health research programs addressed by these changes." @default.
• W4361269148 created "2023-03-31" @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5008984625 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5012884682 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5018901378 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5022157156 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5025601376 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5027335698 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5028792543 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5034994625 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5043946098 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5047523143 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5053430904 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5064302905 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5066817807 @default.
• W4361269148 creator A5069145827 @default.
• W4361269148 date "2023-04-21" @default.
• W4361269148 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4361269148 title "<scp>ACEP–SAEM</scp> response to the National Institutes of Health (<scp>NIH</scp>) proposal to simplify the review framework for research project grant applications" @default.
• W4361269148 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14730" @default.
• W4361269148 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36995344" @default.
• W4361269148 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4361269148 type Work @default.
• W4361269148 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4361269148 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5008984625 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5012884682 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5018901378 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5022157156 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5025601376 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5027335698 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5028792543 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5034994625 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5043946098 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5047523143 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5053430904 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5064302905 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5066817807 @default.
• W4361269148 hasAuthorship W4361269148A5069145827 @default.
• W4361269148 hasBestOaLocation W43612691481 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConcept C48798503 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConceptScore W4361269148C160735492 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConceptScore W4361269148C17744445 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConceptScore W4361269148C199539241 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConceptScore W4361269148C48798503 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConceptScore W4361269148C509550671 @default.
• W4361269148 hasConceptScore W4361269148C71924100 @default.
• W4361269148 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W4361269148 hasLocation W43612691481 @default.
• W4361269148 hasLocation W43612691482 @default.
• W4361269148 hasOpenAccess W4361269148 @default.
• W4361269148 hasPrimaryLocation W43612691481 @default.
• W4361269148 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W4361269148 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W4361269148 hasRelatedWork W2120806726 @default.
• W4361269148 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4361269148 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4361269148 hasRelatedWork W3030732911 @default.
• W4361269148 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W4361269148 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W4361269148 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W4361269148 hasRelatedWork W4323051272 @default.
• W4361269148 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W4361269148 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4361269148 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4361269148 workType "article" @default.