FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4361277793> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4361277793 abstract "10.10 - 11.20: Title TBC, Karl-Heinz Erb 11.20 - 11.40: Uncertainties in modelled CO 2 fluxes from land use and land use change, Wolfgang Obermeier 11.40 - 12.00: Translating land-use fluxes for 2001-2020 from global models to national inventories, Giacomo Grassi (presenting remotely) 12.00 - 12.20: Simulating China's carbon dynamics using improved LUCC data: from source to sink, Zhen Yu (presenting remotely) 12.20 - 12.40: How anthrome carbon cycling influences our understanding of the CO2-fertilzation carbon sink, Anthony Walker Scrutinizing the role of land management for the carbon state of ecosystems Improving our understanding of the complex dynamics of the Earth system is crucial for forging strategies to cope with the current climate and biodiversity crisis. Still, large uncertainties relate to the ability to map and quantify land management and its impacts on ecosystem functioning. A particular knowledge gaps relates to the human-induced changes in terrestrial ecosystems that do not result in land-cover conversions. In this presentation, I present empirical approaches that allow to isolate and quantify the impact of land use on the global ecosystem carbon state. One such approach is the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production, which systematically compares the current carbon fluxes in vegetation with those that would prevail in the absence of land use, i.e. those of the potential vegetation. This approach, focussing on fluxes, can be expanded to the study of carbon biomass stocks and turnover rates in vegetation. From empirical time-series analyses, the presentation draws conclusions on quantitative relations, current trends and possible futures, as well as on still prevailing knowledge gaps and uncertainties related to land use in the global carbon cycle. Uncertainties in modelled CO2 fluxes from land use and land use change Land use and land-use changes (LULUCs) have greatly influenced the global carbon cycle, primarily through emissions from the conversion of natural forests to agricultural land. Additionally, LULUCs have diminished the potential natural land sink, as the cleared primary forests could have sequestered carbon due to favorable environmental changes (mainly via so-called CO2 -fertilization). As in the Global Carbon Project’s global carbon budget, CO2 fluxes from LULUCs can be estimated using models, such as dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) and bookkeeping models (BMs). We assess differences in these modelling approaches, from the global to the country-level, particularly focusing on the assumed environmental conditions. BMs do not consider environmental changes as they rely on observed, fixed carbon stocks (similar to inventory-based approaches). In contrast, transient LULUC flux estimates from DGVMs accumulate the loss of additional sink capacity, accounting for C stock changes that would have occurred in the absence of LULUCs that destroyed the natural land sink. We find that the loss of additional sink capacity accounts for 40% of recent fluxes from LULUCs on the global scale. Additionally, LULUC flux estimates are highly uncertain in some countries, strongly dependent on the assumptions of the environmental conditions and the land use forcing data. Translating land-use fluxes for 2001-2020 from global models to national inventories A striking discrepancy exists in estimates of global anthropogenic land-use CO2 fluxes between the national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGIs) and the IPCC assessment reports, based on bookkeeping models (BMs). This discrepancy is thought to be mainly due to differences in how anthropogenic forest sinks are defined. Building on previous studies, we implement an approach that adds the CO2 sink due to environmental change from countries’ managed forest area (estimated by 16 Dynamic Global Vegetation Models, DGVMs) to the original land-use flux from three BMs. Our results confirm a large difference (6.5 GtCO2 yr-1) in global land use CO2 fluxes between the BMs, estimating a source of 4.8 GtCO2 yr-1 for the period 2001-2020, and NGHGIs, which estimate a sink of -1.7 GtCO2 yr-1. Most of the gap is found on forest land. By adding the DGVMs’ sink in managed forests to BM estimates, the gap between BMs and NGHGIs becomes substantially smaller both globally and in most regions and countries. By offering a blueprint for operationalizing future comparisons between BMs and NGHGIs, and identifying areas to be further investigated, this study represents an important step forward for increasing transparency and confidence in land-use CO2 flux estimates at the country level. Simulating China's carbon dynamics using improved LUCC data: from source to sink Carbon budget accounting relies heavily on Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) land-use data reported by governments. Here we develop a new land-use and cover-change database for China, finding that differing historical survey methods biased China’s reported data causing large errors in FAO databases. Land ecosystem model simulations driven with the new data reveal a strong carbon sink of 8.9±0.8 Pg carbon from 1980 to 2019 in China, which was not captured in FAO-data-based estimations due to biased land-use and cover-change signals. The land-use and cover-change in China, characterized by a rapid forest expansion from 1980 to 2019, contributed to nearly 44% of the national terrestrial carbon sink. In contrast, climate changes (22.3%), increasing nitrogen deposition (12.9%), and rising carbon dioxide (8.1%) are less important contributors. This indicates that previous studies have greatly underestimated the impact of land-use and cover-change on the terrestrial carbon balance of China. This study underlines the importance of reliable land-use and cover-change databases in global carbon budget accounting. How anthrome carbon cycling influences our understanding of the CO2-fertilzation carbon sink The global CO2-driven carbon sink is highly uncertain and is quantified using an ensemble of carbon cycle models. Confidence in this estimate arises from its close fit with the residual of the global carbon budget. However, the global carbon budget relies on estimates of the other major components of the carbon cycle, including the land use and land cover change flux that is quantified using book-keeping models. Combined, these two major fluxes represent a redistribution of carbon across the land-surface rather than substantial net changes in global land carbon. Furthermore, both of these fluxes are highly uncertain and it is possible that models are structurally biased towards predicting a strong CO2 response. In this presentation I will show some global and regional results related to how assumptions and uncertainty in estimates of the land use and land cover change fluxes could have significant implications for our understanding of the global CO2-driven carbon sink." @default.
• W4361277793 created "2023-03-31" @default.
• W4361277793 creator A5003672470 @default.
• W4361277793 creator A5015410865 @default.
• W4361277793 creator A5027051661 @default.
• W4361277793 creator A5081121371 @default.
• W4361277793 creator A5084646199 @default.
• W4361277793 date "2023-03-29" @default.
• W4361277793 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4361277793 title "Anthromes, CO2 and Terrestrial Carbon – Session 5: Implications of land use change uncertainties for the CO2-driven natural land sink" @default.
• W4361277793 cites W3121103211 @default.
• W4361277793 doi "https://doi.org/10.52843/cassyni.ghc3md" @default.
• W4361277793 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4361277793 type Work @default.
• W4361277793 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4361277793 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4361277793 hasAuthorship W4361277793A5003672470 @default.
• W4361277793 hasAuthorship W4361277793A5015410865 @default.
• W4361277793 hasAuthorship W4361277793A5027051661 @default.
• W4361277793 hasAuthorship W4361277793A5081121371 @default.
• W4361277793 hasAuthorship W4361277793A5084646199 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C110872660 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C111368507 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C122690726 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C132651083 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C140205800 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C143050476 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C149677717 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C175605778 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C2776608160 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C2779182362 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C4792198 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C6939412 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C104779481 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C107826830 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C110872660 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C111368507 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C11413529 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C122690726 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C127313418 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C127413603 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C132651083 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C136764020 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C140205800 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C143050476 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C147176958 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C149677717 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C162324750 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C166957645 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C175605778 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C18903297 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C205649164 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C2776608160 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C2779182362 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C39432304 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C41008148 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C4792198 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C58640448 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C6939412 @default.
• W4361277793 hasConceptScore W4361277793C86803240 @default.
• W4361277793 hasLocation W43612777931 @default.
• W4361277793 hasOpenAccess W4361277793 @default.
• W4361277793 hasPrimaryLocation W43612777931 @default.
• W4361277793 hasRelatedWork W134735986 @default.
• W4361277793 hasRelatedWork W1823741258 @default.
• W4361277793 hasRelatedWork W1984319252 @default.
• W4361277793 hasRelatedWork W1999753309 @default.
• W4361277793 hasRelatedWork W2012868472 @default.
• W4361277793 hasRelatedWork W2362478085 @default.
• W4361277793 hasRelatedWork W2562404486 @default.
• W4361277793 hasRelatedWork W2581750035 @default.
• W4361277793 hasRelatedWork W2901075398 @default.
• W4361277793 hasRelatedWork W4385240582 @default.
• W4361277793 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4361277793 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4361277793 workType "article" @default.