FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4361302181> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4361302181 endingPage "e39383" @default.
• W4361302181 startingPage "e39383" @default.
• W4361302181 abstract "Digital health tools such as electronic immunization registries (EIRs) have the potential to improve patient care and alleviate the challenges that arise from the use of paper-based clinic records for reporting. To address some of these challenges, the Kenya Ministry of Health and the International Training and Education Center for Health Kenya implemented an EIR system in 161 immunizing clinics in Siaya County between 2018 and 2019. The successful implementation of digital health tools depends on many factors, one of which is alignment between the technology and the context in which it is used. One important aspect of that implementation context is the perceptions of the health care workers (HCWs) using the EIR.This study aimed to evaluate HCWs' perceptions of the usability and acceptability of multiple clinic workflows using the new EIR.We performed a mixed methods pre-post study using semistructured interviews with HCWs at 6 facilities in Siaya County, Kenya. We interviewed HCWs at each facility 4 times: at baseline and once after the implementation of 3 different workflow modifications (n=24 interviews). The baseline state was dual data entry with paper records and the EIR. We then implemented 3 workflow modifications for 1 full day each: fully paperless data entry, preparation of an appointment diary before patient visits for the day, and a combination of the 2 workflows. We compared ratings and themes across interviews after each of the 4 workflows to understand the changes in the usability and acceptability of the EIR.HCWs considered the EIR clinic workflows to be usable and acceptable. Of the modified workflows, HCWs perceived the fully paperless workflow most favorably. In all workflows, HCWs' perceived benefits included ease of clinical decision-making using the EIR, reduced mental burden of data entry when using the EIR, and ease of identification of errors. Perceived barriers to the workflow included contextual challenges such as staffing shortages and lack of network connectivity, EIR platform challenges such as errors in saving records and missing fields, and workflow challenges such as the dual data entry burden of using paper and digital tools simultaneously.Fully paperless EIR implementation shows great promise from a workflow acceptability standpoint, contingent upon the presence of supporting contextual clinic factors and the resolution of system performance and design challenges. Rather than trying to identify a singular best workflow, future efforts should provide adequate flexibility for HCWs to implement the new system in their unique clinic context. Future EIR implementation stands to benefit from continued monitoring of EIR adoption acceptability during implementation, both for Siaya's program and for other efforts around the globe, as digital health interventions become more widely used." @default.
• W4361302181 created "2023-03-31" @default.
• W4361302181 creator A5008434570 @default.
• W4361302181 creator A5015548332 @default.
• W4361302181 creator A5046996736 @default.
• W4361302181 creator A5062968647 @default.
• W4361302181 creator A5066846813 @default.
• W4361302181 creator A5068203048 @default.
• W4361302181 creator A5075799661 @default.
• W4361302181 date "2023-03-30" @default.
• W4361302181 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4361302181 title "Usability and Acceptability of Electronic Immunization Registry Data Entry Workflows From the Health Care Worker Perspective in Siaya, Kenya (Part 3): Pre-Post Study" @default.
• W4361302181 cites W1480033610 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W1564854039 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W1787211267 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2011721641 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2019814069 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2063521929 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2099473180 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2123051583 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2132447236 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2149423735 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2178472996 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2582406074 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2737108840 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2766777595 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2838937885 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2890680583 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2915217714 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2967276838 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2979239620 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W2995766343 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W3080862813 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W4312346678 @default.
• W4361302181 cites W4312669680 @default.
• W4361302181 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/39383" @default.
• W4361302181 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36995755" @default.
• W4361302181 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4361302181 type Work @default.
• W4361302181 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4361302181 countsByYear W43613021812023 @default.
• W4361302181 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4361302181 hasAuthorship W4361302181A5008434570 @default.
• W4361302181 hasAuthorship W4361302181A5015548332 @default.
• W4361302181 hasAuthorship W4361302181A5046996736 @default.
• W4361302181 hasAuthorship W4361302181A5062968647 @default.
• W4361302181 hasAuthorship W4361302181A5066846813 @default.
• W4361302181 hasAuthorship W4361302181A5068203048 @default.
• W4361302181 hasAuthorship W4361302181A5075799661 @default.
• W4361302181 hasBestOaLocation W43613021811 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C177212765 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C2775949068 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C2986740045 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C107457646 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C151730666 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C159110408 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C160735492 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C170130773 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C177212765 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C17744445 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C199539241 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C2775949068 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C2779343474 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C2908647359 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C2986740045 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C41008148 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C509550671 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C512399662 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C71924100 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C77088390 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C86803240 @default.
• W4361302181 hasConceptScore W4361302181C99454951 @default.
• W4361302181 hasLocation W43613021811 @default.
• W4361302181 hasLocation W43613021812 @default.
• W4361302181 hasLocation W43613021813 @default.
• W4361302181 hasOpenAccess W4361302181 @default.
• W4361302181 hasPrimaryLocation W43613021811 @default.
• W4361302181 hasRelatedWork W111501176 @default.
• W4361302181 hasRelatedWork W2011088256 @default.
• W4361302181 hasRelatedWork W2067460287 @default.
• W4361302181 hasRelatedWork W2288569318 @default.
• W4361302181 hasRelatedWork W2375603192 @default.

• next