FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4361868416> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4361868416 endingPage "272" @default.
• W4361868416 startingPage "265" @default.
• W4361868416 abstract "In Brief Study Design. Single-center randomized prospective study at a university hospital. Objective. The aim of the present study was to provide a 2-year outcome comparison of microdiscectomy (D) versus microscopic sequestrectomy (S) in terms of reherniation rates, clinical investigation, and self-rated parameters using a comprehensive questionnaire. Summary of Background Data. Simple fragment excision in cases of herniated lumbar discs has been repeatedly reported as an alternative to standard microdiscectomy, but prospective data with sufficient follow-up is lacking to date. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study in patients with lumbar disc herniations indicated equal reherniation rates and a trend toward superior clinical results in patients undergoing only sequestrectomy after 4 to 6 months. Material and Methods. Eighty-four patients with lumbar disc herniations were treated with microdiscectomy or microscopic sequestrectomy in equal parts. Patients were re-evaluated thoroughly clinically after 2 years. Results of this investigation (low back pain, sciatica, motor-, sensory-, reflex-, straight leg raising test-indexes) and self-rated parameters including SF-36 were analyzed for differences between groups and between time points. Results. Thirty-eight (D) and 40 (S) patients were attainable for follow-up. Reherniation rates did not differ significantly (10.5%, group D; 12.5%, group S; P = 1.0). Following dramatic improvement after surgery in both groups, results of the clinical investigation remained stable over time without significant differences between groups. In contrast, self-rated assessment demonstrated clinical deterioration of the surgical results within the first 2 years after microdiscectomy, while they rather improved after sequestrectomy. Because of this development, the outcome measures at 2 years pointed in favor of sequestrectomy with results being significant for important parameters such as use of analgesics, performance, and overall outcome. Conclusion. Reherniation rates within 2 years after sequestrectomy and microdiscectomy are comparable. However, outcome after microdiscectomy seems to worsen over time, whereas it remains stable after sequestrectomy. Thus, 2-year follow-up revealed clinical results favoring sequestrectomy. Performing sequestrectomy alone may therefore represent an advantageous alternative to standard microdiscectomy. In a monocentric randomized prospective study 84 patients with herniated lumbar discs were treated either by standard microdiscectomy or simple microscopic sequestrectomy. Reherniation rates and objective nerve root symptoms did not differ between groups within a follow-up period of 2 years. Questionnaire-assessed outcome, however, demonstrated superior results after sequestrectomy." @default.
• W4361868416 created "2023-04-05" @default.
• W4361868416 creator A5054644896 @default.
• W4361868416 creator A5061320417 @default.
• W4361868416 creator A5077732613 @default.
• W4361868416 date "2008-02-01" @default.
• W4361868416 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4361868416 title "Two-Year Outcome After Lumbar Microdiscectomy Versus Microscopic Sequestrectomy" @default.
• W4361868416 cites W147874747 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W1964171656 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W1964229037 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W1979689605 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W1985880055 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W1990777995 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2007384430 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2012366228 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2015479045 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2029616555 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2031199884 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2032116848 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2033568227 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2038573027 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2056000998 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2060299574 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2064939497 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2067277807 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2074870907 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2082013121 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2129478362 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2156803986 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2226901573 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2338278742 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W2792831996 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W4293774711 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W4321509046 @default.
• W4361868416 cites W85913373 @default.
• W4361868416 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318162018c" @default.
• W4361868416 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W4361868416 type Work @default.
• W4361868416 citedByCount "65" @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162012 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162013 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162014 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162015 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162016 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162017 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162018 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162019 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162020 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162021 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162022 @default.
• W4361868416 countsByYear W43618684162023 @default.
• W4361868416 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4361868416 hasAuthorship W4361868416A5054644896 @default.
• W4361868416 hasAuthorship W4361868416A5061320417 @default.
• W4361868416 hasAuthorship W4361868416A5077732613 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConcept C2776698514 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConceptScore W4361868416C141071460 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConceptScore W4361868416C142724271 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConceptScore W4361868416C188816634 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConceptScore W4361868416C204787440 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConceptScore W4361868416C2776698514 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConceptScore W4361868416C2780907711 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConceptScore W4361868416C44575665 @default.
• W4361868416 hasConceptScore W4361868416C71924100 @default.
• W4361868416 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4361868416 hasLocation W43618684161 @default.
• W4361868416 hasOpenAccess W4361868416 @default.
• W4361868416 hasPrimaryLocation W43618684161 @default.
• W4361868416 hasRelatedWork W168042258 @default.
• W4361868416 hasRelatedWork W2001090537 @default.
• W4361868416 hasRelatedWork W2054399089 @default.
• W4361868416 hasRelatedWork W2258098147 @default.
• W4361868416 hasRelatedWork W2384611358 @default.
• W4361868416 hasRelatedWork W2415244915 @default.
• W4361868416 hasRelatedWork W2418610261 @default.
• W4361868416 hasRelatedWork W2469912804 @default.
• W4361868416 hasRelatedWork W2473224156 @default.
• W4361868416 hasRelatedWork W2508244865 @default.
• W4361868416 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W4361868416 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4361868416 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4361868416 workType "article" @default.