FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4362601609> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4362601609 endingPage "e42782" @default.
• W4362601609 startingPage "e42782" @default.
• W4362601609 abstract "Currently, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the sixth-leading cause of cancer-related deaths among Chinese women. Worse still, misinformation contributes to the aggravation of the breast cancer burden in China. There is a pressing need to investigate the susceptibility to breast cancer misinformation among Chinese patients. However, no study has been performed in this respect.This study aims to ascertain whether some demographics (age, gender, and education), some health literacy skills, and the internal locus of control are significantly associated with the susceptibility to misinformation about all types of breast cancers among randomly sampled Chinese patients of both genders in order to provide insightful implications for clinical practice, health education, medical research, and health policy making.We first designed a questionnaire comprising 4 sections of information: age, gender, and education (section 1); self-assessed disease knowledge (section 2); the All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale (AAHLS), the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), the 6-item General Health Numeracy Test (GHNT-6), and the Internal subscale of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales (section 3); and 10 breast cancer myths collected from some officially registered and authenticated websites (section 4). Subsequently, we recruited patients from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, China, using randomized sampling. The questionnaire was administered via wenjuanxing, the most popular online survey platform in China. The collected data were manipulated in a Microsoft Excel file. We manually checked the validity of each questionnaire using the predefined validity criterion. After that, we coded all valid questionnaires according to the predefined coding scheme, based on Likert scales of different point (score) ranges for different sections of the questionnaire. In the subsequent step, we calculated the sums of the subsections of the AAHLS and the sums of the 2 health literacy scales (the eHEALS and GHNT-6) and the 10 breast cancer myths. Finally, we applied logistic regression modeling to relate the scores in section 4 to the scores in sections 1-3 of the questionnaire to identify what significantly contributes to the susceptibility to breast cancer misinformation among Chinese patients.All 447 questionnaires collected were valid according to the validity criterion. The participants were aged 38.29 (SD 11.52) years on average. The mean score for their education was 3.68 (SD 1.46), implying that their average educational attainment was between year 12 and a diploma (junior college). Of the 447 participants, 348 (77.85%) were women. The mean score for their self-assessed disease knowledge was 2.50 (SD 0.92), indicating that their self-assessed disease knowledge status was between knowing a lot and knowing some. The mean scores of the subconstructs in the AAHLS were 6.22 (SD 1.34) for functional health literacy, 5.22 (SD 1.54) for communicative health literacy, and 11.19 (SD 1.99) for critical health literacy. The mean score for eHealth literacy was 24.21 (SD 5.49). The mean score for the 6 questions in the GHNT-6 was 1.57 (SD 0.49), 1.21 (SD 0.41), 1.24 (SD 0.43), 1.90 (SD 0.30), 1.82 (SD 0.39), and 1.73 (SD 0.44), respectively. The mean score for the patients' health beliefs and self-confidence was 21.19 (SD 5.63). The mean score for their response to each myth ranged from 1.24 (SD 0.43) to 1.67 (SD 0.47), and the mean score for responses to the 10 myths was 14.03 (SD 1.78). Through interpreting these descriptive statistics, we found that Chinese female patients' limited ability to rebut breast cancer misinformation is mainly attributed to 5 factors: (1) lower communicative health literacy, (2) certainty about self-assessed eHealth literacy skills, (3) lower general health numeracy, (4) positive self-assessment of general disease knowledge, and (5) more negative health beliefs and lower levels of self-confidence.Drawing on logistic regression modeling, we studied the susceptibility to breast cancer misinformation among Chinese patients. The predicting factors of the susceptibility to breast cancer misinformation identified in this study can provide insightful implications for clinical practice, health education, medical research, and health policy making." @default.
• W4362601609 created "2023-04-06" @default.
• W4362601609 creator A5003904999 @default.
• W4362601609 creator A5030252421 @default.
• W4362601609 creator A5059078985 @default.
• W4362601609 creator A5083939023 @default.
• W4362601609 creator A5090682850 @default.
• W4362601609 date "2023-04-05" @default.
• W4362601609 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4362601609 title "Susceptibility to Breast Cancer Misinformation Among Chinese Patients: Cross-sectional Study" @default.
• W4362601609 cites W1485761988 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W1593259825 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W1970172504 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W1974701860 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W1981989535 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W1986406928 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W1988767464 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W1999011202 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2017576292 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2019075819 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2020830322 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2030677354 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2037924767 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2046432156 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2050288708 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2051659622 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2059459456 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2060715481 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2064089371 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2069611505 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2078661272 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2081034705 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2083891159 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2085714022 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2087826454 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2101761001 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2106787323 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2107710396 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2130556529 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2134621022 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2140453756 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2140964565 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2141918028 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2143175252 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2144543402 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2152288404 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2168217134 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2560449667 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2738219911 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2743558319 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2799871693 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2884174104 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2888837094 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2911551042 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2914029546 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W2914410035 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W3021511903 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W3089975607 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W3186653455 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W4200415693 @default.
• W4362601609 cites W4231560570 @default.
• W4362601609 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/42782" @default.
• W4362601609 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37018020" @default.
• W4362601609 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4362601609 type Work @default.
• W4362601609 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4362601609 countsByYear W43626016092023 @default.
• W4362601609 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4362601609 hasAuthorship W4362601609A5003904999 @default.
• W4362601609 hasAuthorship W4362601609A5030252421 @default.
• W4362601609 hasAuthorship W4362601609A5059078985 @default.
• W4362601609 hasAuthorship W4362601609A5083939023 @default.
• W4362601609 hasAuthorship W4362601609A5090682850 @default.
• W4362601609 hasBestOaLocation W43626016091 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C2776990098 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C2778843546 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C121608353 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C126322002 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C160735492 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C162324750 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C17744445 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C199539241 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C2776990098 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C2778843546 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C50522688 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C512399662 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C530470458 @default.
• W4362601609 hasConceptScore W4362601609C71924100 @default.

• next