FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4362699863> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4362699863 endingPage "357" @default.
• W4362699863 startingPage "356" @default.
• W4362699863 abstract "The use of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in obstetrics and gynecology has been the subject of 2 recent articles in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (AJOG).1Chavez M.R. Butler T.S. Rekawek P. Heo H. Kinzler W.L. Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer: why we should embrace this technology.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; ([Epub ahead of print])Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2) Google Scholar,2Grünebaum A. Chervenak J. Pollet S.L. Katz A. Chervenak F.A. The exciting potential for ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; ([Epub ahead of print])Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Chavez et al1Chavez M.R. Butler T.S. Rekawek P. Heo H. Kinzler W.L. Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer: why we should embrace this technology.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; ([Epub ahead of print])Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2) Google Scholar addressed the potential value of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence chatbot, in medical education and scientific writing. AI chatbots promise to facilitate the writing of scientific articles; however, we wish to inform readers of AJOG about a potential liability of ChatGPT. We have found that ChatGPT frequently provides erroneous and fictitious references that may include incorrect authors, journals, titles of articles, years of publication, and PubMed identifiers (PMID and DOI). Sometimes, the title of the article is correct, but the chatbots include incorrect authors or other information. Citations are intended to allocate appropriate credit for previous contributions, identify sources of ideas and chart the progress of a line of investigation. Errors in references undermine the credibility of the authors and trustworthiness of a scientific report.3Thorp H.H. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author.Science. 2023; 379: 313Crossref PubMed Scopus (63) Google Scholar, 4Santini A. The importance of referencing.J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2018; 4: 3-4Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 5Flier J.S. Credit and priority in scientific discovery: a scientist’s perspective.Perspect Biol Med. 2019; 62: 189-215Crossref PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar Therefore, verification of all components of references provided by chatbots is necessary. The causes for the inaccuracies of ChatGPT are related to the vast amount of text data from diverse sources and inconsistency errors or inaccuracies in the primary data, which may influence the AI generated response. It is expected that the current limitations of AI chatbots will improve with time. A specific limitation of ChatGPT is that it relies on a fixed database with a particular knowledge cutoff date (November 2021). Recently, Bard, another AI chatbot, has been released by Google. This AI chatbot can be integrated with a Google Search and, therefore, may improve the accuracy of the information. Other AI assisted programs are available for identification of relevant bibliography such as Elicit, “the AI research assistant,” which can search for specific scientific literature (eg randomized clinical trials). In conclusion, authors need to verify the accuracy of chatbots outputs before submitting manuscripts for publication. ChatGPT: the good, the bad, and the potentialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics & GynecologyPreviewWe appreciate Sanchez-Ramos et al1 for further highlighting this concern of reference verification. As mentioned in our article, vetting any information provided by Artificial Intelligence like chatbots is crucial, “By no way are they meant to be all-inclusive. In fact, we challenge the reader to engage with the program and experience for themselves the benefits, as well as the limitations, of this technology using their own examples. In our experience, we have received answers with which we did not agree or that were incorrect” and “As with any powerful tool, there is potential for misuse, both intentional and unintentional. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W4362699863 created "2023-04-09" @default.
• W4362699863 creator A5014082258 @default.
• W4362699863 creator A5040647242 @default.
• W4362699863 creator A5067511554 @default.
• W4362699863 date "2023-09-01" @default.
• W4362699863 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W4362699863 title "Beware of references when using ChatGPT as a source of information to write scientific articles" @default.
• W4362699863 cites W2789285438 @default.
• W4362699863 cites W2925572818 @default.
• W4362699863 cites W4318263917 @default.
• W4362699863 cites W4324370593 @default.
• W4362699863 cites W4324370640 @default.
• W4362699863 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.004" @default.
• W4362699863 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37031761" @default.
• W4362699863 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4362699863 type Work @default.
• W4362699863 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W4362699863 countsByYear W43626998632023 @default.
• W4362699863 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4362699863 hasAuthorship W4362699863A5014082258 @default.
• W4362699863 hasAuthorship W4362699863A5040647242 @default.
• W4362699863 hasAuthorship W4362699863A5067511554 @default.
• W4362699863 hasBestOaLocation W43626998631 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C10885799 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C3017579018 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C10885799 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C161191863 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C17744445 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C199539241 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C2779234561 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C2779473830 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C3017579018 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C41008148 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C509550671 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C54355233 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C71924100 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C83867959 @default.
• W4362699863 hasConceptScore W4362699863C86803240 @default.
• W4362699863 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4362699863 hasLocation W43626998631 @default.
• W4362699863 hasLocation W43626998632 @default.
• W4362699863 hasOpenAccess W4362699863 @default.
• W4362699863 hasPrimaryLocation W43626998631 @default.
• W4362699863 hasRelatedWork W2018488738 @default.
• W4362699863 hasRelatedWork W2214187360 @default.
• W4362699863 hasRelatedWork W2258459241 @default.
• W4362699863 hasRelatedWork W2552566180 @default.
• W4362699863 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4362699863 hasRelatedWork W2901019573 @default.
• W4362699863 hasRelatedWork W2992986615 @default.
• W4362699863 hasRelatedWork W2993501912 @default.
• W4362699863 hasRelatedWork W3140300071 @default.
• W4362699863 hasRelatedWork W4380081217 @default.
• W4362699863 hasVolume "229" @default.
• W4362699863 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4362699863 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4362699863 workType "article" @default.