FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4364355514> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4364355514 endingPage "107229" @default.
• W4364355514 startingPage "107229" @default.
• W4364355514 abstract "Requirement elicitation can be done by individuals or by groups. Computer-based system development life-cycle models suggest having people working together for many steps. Also, recommendations about analysis and design methods indicate that some processes could take advantage of group work. In requirements engineering, groups are suggested for requirements elicitation. From the software and the requirements engineering viewpoints, and in turn for companies, a relevant overall research question is “What is a suitable size for a requirements elicitation group?” Our goal was to answer this question, first by looking for available guidelines in textbooks and secondly by investigating requirements elicitation in companies. To address the research question, we conducted two studies. The first was a review of most widely adopted software and requirements engineering textbooks. The second was a study aimed at identifying factors affecting group size for requirements elicitation, based on an online questionnaire submitted to professional analysts. The review of the textbooks showed that very few give advice on the number of analysts to involve in requirements elicitation sessions. When they do, guidelines are quite general and not supported by empirical data. According to data gathered from the questionnaire, most companies use and suggest using small groups. Data also allowed identifying four categories of factors useful to make decisions about requirements elicitation group sizes: people, relation, project, and output. Both the textbook review and the data from the questionnaire say that it is better to aim for small groups than to have individual analysts working separately. The ideal number of analysts for a requirements elicitation session appears to be 2, but large groups are necessary in some cases. Factors in all the four categories have to be considered in deciding the size of groups." @default.
• W4364355514 created "2023-04-12" @default.
• W4364355514 creator A5003905882 @default.
• W4364355514 creator A5038715874 @default.
• W4364355514 creator A5047897975 @default.
• W4364355514 date "2023-08-01" @default.
• W4364355514 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4364355514 title "To group or not to group? Group sizes for requirements elicitation" @default.
• W4364355514 cites W1571012001 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2021565261 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2034568715 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2044239701 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2058818941 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2084620680 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2107086891 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2132392869 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2172230260 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2536286199 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2569512077 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2791610171 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W2808827828 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W3047975735 @default.
• W4364355514 cites W3123157479 @default.
• W4364355514 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107229" @default.
• W4364355514 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4364355514 type Work @default.
• W4364355514 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4364355514 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4364355514 hasAuthorship W4364355514A5003905882 @default.
• W4364355514 hasAuthorship W4364355514A5038715874 @default.
• W4364355514 hasAuthorship W4364355514A5047897975 @default.
• W4364355514 hasBestOaLocation W43643555141 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C115903868 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C173577280 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C2776035091 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C45384764 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C59488412 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C6604083 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConcept C72161134 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C105795698 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C115903868 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C142362112 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C153349607 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C173577280 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C199360897 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C2776035091 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C2777904410 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C33923547 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C41008148 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C45384764 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C56739046 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C59488412 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C6604083 @default.
• W4364355514 hasConceptScore W4364355514C72161134 @default.
• W4364355514 hasLocation W43643555141 @default.
• W4364355514 hasOpenAccess W4364355514 @default.
• W4364355514 hasPrimaryLocation W43643555141 @default.
• W4364355514 hasRelatedWork W1552042786 @default.
• W4364355514 hasRelatedWork W1596249124 @default.
• W4364355514 hasRelatedWork W2046795207 @default.
• W4364355514 hasRelatedWork W2115113770 @default.
• W4364355514 hasRelatedWork W2178699783 @default.
• W4364355514 hasRelatedWork W2212135093 @default.
• W4364355514 hasRelatedWork W3143558183 @default.
• W4364355514 hasRelatedWork W3152487049 @default.
• W4364355514 hasRelatedWork W4213379300 @default.
• W4364355514 hasRelatedWork W2181998829 @default.
• W4364355514 hasVolume "160" @default.
• W4364355514 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4364355514 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4364355514 workType "article" @default.