FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4364356319> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4364356319 endingPage "827.e10" @default.
• W4364356319 startingPage "817" @default.
• W4364356319 abstract "ObjectiveSex differences regarding the safety and efficacy of carotid revascularization in carotid artery stenosis have been addressed in several studies with conflicting results. Moreover, women are underrepresented in clinical trials, leading to limited conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of acute stroke treatments.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by literature search including four databases from January 1985 to December 2021. Sex differences in the efficacy and safety of revascularization procedures, including carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses were analyzed.ResultsRegarding CEA in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, the stroke risk in men (3.6%) and women (3.9%) based on 99,495 patients (30 studies) did not differ (P = .16). There was also no difference in the stroke risk by different time frames up to 10 years. Compared with men, women treated with CEA had a significantly higher stroke or death rate at 4 months (2 studies, 2565 patients; 7.2% vs 5.0%; odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.12; I2 = 0%; P = .03), and a significantly higher rate of restenosis (1 study, 615; 17.2% vs 6.7%; OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.66-4.75; P = .0001). For CAS in symptomatic artery stenosis, data showed a non-significant tendency toward higher peri-procedural stroke in women, whereas for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, data based on 332,344 patients showed that women (compared with men) after CEA had similar rates of stroke, stroke or death, and the composite outcome stroke/death/myocardial infarction. The rate of restenosis at 1 year was significantly higher in women compared with men (1 study, 372 patients; 10.8% vs 3.2%; OR, 3.71; 95% CI, 1.49-9.2; P = .005). Furthermore, CAS in asymptomatic patients was associated with low risk of a postprocedural stroke in both sexes, but a significantly higher risk of in-hospital myocardial infarction in women than men (8445 patients, 1.2% vs 0.6%; OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.23-3.28; I2 = 0%; P = .005).ConclusionsA few sex-differences in short-term outcomes after carotid revascularization for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis were found, although there were no significant differences in the overall stroke. This indicates a need for larger multicenter prospective studies to evaluate these sex-specific differences. More women, including those aged over 80 years, need to be enrolled in randomized controlled trials, to better understand if sex differences exist and to tailor carotid revascularization accordingly." @default.
• W4364356319 created "2023-04-12" @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5007569095 @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5015908820 @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5022665738 @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5032258251 @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5039618335 @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5043651908 @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5055707137 @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5056951090 @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5059986627 @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5066328545 @default.
• W4364356319 creator A5072761914 @default.
• W4364356319 date "2023-09-01" @default.
• W4364356319 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4364356319 title "Sex differences in outcome after carotid revascularization in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis" @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1240555563 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W154941835 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1707304634 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1740376762 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1964363514 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1970414946 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1976477846 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1976501834 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1983438719 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1983508318 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1983579896 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1987339492 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W1998135399 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2003368789 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2003786549 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2009622336 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2017182381 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2027033507 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2029088929 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2029809331 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2033203997 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2039420990 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2045406178 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2047422843 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2048804943 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2053167262 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2057689781 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2059960553 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2065264130 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2069740786 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2071051281 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2076739148 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2081208940 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2089525740 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2090715808 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2100194095 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2101104028 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2108246761 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2116345543 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2122528416 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2126793024 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2128588511 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2128749853 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2129869438 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2134629705 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2137169015 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2140862373 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2154532030 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2156976019 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2167544064 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2210176735 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2336201514 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2596260965 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2610523530 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W2986959867 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W3081912276 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W3158562379 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W3173746046 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W3196534429 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W4225346746 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W4232492418 @default.
• W4364356319 cites W4288052540 @default.
• W4364356319 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.502" @default.
• W4364356319 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37055001" @default.
• W4364356319 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4364356319 type Work @default.
• W4364356319 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4364356319 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5007569095 @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5015908820 @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5022665738 @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5032258251 @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5039618335 @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5043651908 @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5055707137 @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5056951090 @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5059986627 @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5066328545 @default.
• W4364356319 hasAuthorship W4364356319A5072761914 @default.
• W4364356319 hasBestOaLocation W43643563191 @default.
• W4364356319 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4364356319 hasConcept C126838900 @default.

• next