FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4365142559> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4365142559 endingPage "565" @default.
• W4365142559 startingPage "565" @default.
• W4365142559 abstract "Introduction Only 2.7% of eligible patients with heart failure (HF) attend cardiac rehabilitation (CR) despite its benefits. Home and community based models of CR have been developed in an effort to overcome known attendance barriers for HF patients such as lack of access to local CR programs, cost, lack of provider referral, time conflicts, and physical limitations to exercise. However, there has yet to be a systematic review of the HF patient experiences with home and community based models of CR. This qualitative data can provide critical insight as to what makes a physical activity intervention accessible and appealing to patients with HF in order to guide future intervention design and implementation and reduce disparities in access to CR. Aim To determine experiences with home and community based models of CR in patients with HF. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and PsychINFO for studies that included perspectives of patients with HF participating in a home or community based model of CR published between 2009 and Jan 2022. We then conducted a thematic analysis of the results section of each included study. Results 12 studies were included, representing the perspectives of 188 individuals who participated or supported patient participation in a home or community based model of CR. Exercises included: aquatic, exergaming, chair-based exercise, walking, tai chi, aerobics and yoga. Three programs were center-based, and the remaining 9 were home-based. Communication methods of home-based programs included intermittent or scheduled phone calls, home visits, or hospital visits. Patient perspectives comprised three central themes: (1) Exercise Benefits; (2) Exercise Facilitators; and (3) Barriers that altered or prevented participation. Participants in all 12 studies reported an improvement in self-efficacy and lifestyle changes as well as in physical health. Peer and family support was the largest facilitator, followed by feeling safe and supported during exercise, and convenient access to the CR program. Seven out of 12 study participants described fearful preconception about exercising as a barrier. Conclusions All home and community based models of CR were found to be physically, psychologically, and/or socially beneficial to patients with HF. Patients described facilitators and barriers that were influential in the decision to initiate and continue exercise. Home and community based models are an innovation to disparities in access to CR; these results can aid in the design of future models. Only 2.7% of eligible patients with heart failure (HF) attend cardiac rehabilitation (CR) despite its benefits. Home and community based models of CR have been developed in an effort to overcome known attendance barriers for HF patients such as lack of access to local CR programs, cost, lack of provider referral, time conflicts, and physical limitations to exercise. However, there has yet to be a systematic review of the HF patient experiences with home and community based models of CR. This qualitative data can provide critical insight as to what makes a physical activity intervention accessible and appealing to patients with HF in order to guide future intervention design and implementation and reduce disparities in access to CR. To determine experiences with home and community based models of CR in patients with HF. We systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and PsychINFO for studies that included perspectives of patients with HF participating in a home or community based model of CR published between 2009 and Jan 2022. We then conducted a thematic analysis of the results section of each included study. 12 studies were included, representing the perspectives of 188 individuals who participated or supported patient participation in a home or community based model of CR. Exercises included: aquatic, exergaming, chair-based exercise, walking, tai chi, aerobics and yoga. Three programs were center-based, and the remaining 9 were home-based. Communication methods of home-based programs included intermittent or scheduled phone calls, home visits, or hospital visits. Patient perspectives comprised three central themes: (1) Exercise Benefits; (2) Exercise Facilitators; and (3) Barriers that altered or prevented participation. Participants in all 12 studies reported an improvement in self-efficacy and lifestyle changes as well as in physical health. Peer and family support was the largest facilitator, followed by feeling safe and supported during exercise, and convenient access to the CR program. Seven out of 12 study participants described fearful preconception about exercising as a barrier. All home and community based models of CR were found to be physically, psychologically, and/or socially beneficial to patients with HF. Patients described facilitators and barriers that were influential in the decision to initiate and continue exercise. Home and community based models are an innovation to disparities in access to CR; these results can aid in the design of future models." @default.
• W4365142559 created "2023-04-13" @default.
• W4365142559 creator A5019317759 @default.
• W4365142559 creator A5047453807 @default.
• W4365142559 date "2023-04-01" @default.
• W4365142559 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W4365142559 title "Patients With Heart Failure Describe Benefits, Facilitators And Barriers To Home And Community Based Models Of Cardiac Rehabilitation-What Makes Me Move" @default.
• W4365142559 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.10.048" @default.
• W4365142559 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4365142559 type Work @default.
• W4365142559 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4365142559 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4365142559 hasAuthorship W4365142559A5019317759 @default.
• W4365142559 hasAuthorship W4365142559A5047453807 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C2778173179 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C2778707766 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C2781050511 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C138885662 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C144024400 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C159110408 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C160735492 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C162324750 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C1862650 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C190248442 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C27415008 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C2776135927 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C2778173179 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C2778707766 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C2778818304 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C2779891985 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C2780665704 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C2781050511 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C2781145037 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C36289849 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C41895202 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C50522688 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C512399662 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C71924100 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C74196892 @default.
• W4365142559 hasConceptScore W4365142559C74909509 @default.
• W4365142559 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4365142559 hasLocation W43651425591 @default.
• W4365142559 hasOpenAccess W4365142559 @default.
• W4365142559 hasPrimaryLocation W43651425591 @default.
• W4365142559 hasRelatedWork W2021672893 @default.
• W4365142559 hasRelatedWork W2178062554 @default.
• W4365142559 hasRelatedWork W2414778427 @default.
• W4365142559 hasRelatedWork W3173519075 @default.
• W4365142559 hasRelatedWork W4205164387 @default.
• W4365142559 hasRelatedWork W4244540730 @default.
• W4365142559 hasRelatedWork W4283395499 @default.
• W4365142559 hasRelatedWork W4317753350 @default.
• W4365142559 hasRelatedWork W4318715679 @default.
• W4365142559 hasRelatedWork W4378746634 @default.
• W4365142559 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W4365142559 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4365142559 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4365142559 workType "article" @default.