FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366000811> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366000811 endingPage "388" @default.
• W4366000811 startingPage "365" @default.
• W4366000811 abstract "The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. It is doubtful whether meditation is included in the protection of religious freedom. Traditionally, meditation has been used as a means to achieve religious goals. Modern meditation is losing its religiosity. In other words, modern meditation is changing into secularity, popularity, and industrialization. The secularization of meditation calls for a reinterpretation of the concept of religion. The concept of meditation is no longer limited to religion. Meditation is an expansion of an open concept in which the religious dimension and the secular dimension correspond or separate. Meditation cannot be embraced as a religion and set as a uniform protection area for religious freedom. The state should consider the scope of religion to protect religious freedom. There is no agreed upon constitutional definition. A constitutional answer to this is required. This is because a new interpretation is needed for peaceful coexistence between the two different concepts under the constitutional order. The constitutional issues regarding meditation are largely organized into three categories. First, is meditation a religion? Second, what is the concept of meditation in the constitution? Third, what is the relationship between freedom of religion and meditation? It is possible to try an effective constitutional interpretation of religious freedom by dividing it into religious meditation and secular meditation. In the case of religious meditation, it is a means to the only end pursued by religion. Unlike this, in the case of secular meditation, a reasonable constitutional interpretation must be premised in that it is a practice of life to internally experience the various purposes of each person. This study considers whether it is legitimate to regard meditation with religiousness as the realm of freedom of religion, but in the case of meditation with secularity, as the realm of freedom from religion. To prove this, the concept of religion and meditation, and freedom of religion and freedom from religion in the Constitution were distinguished and explored. The specific content of freedom from religion was reviewed by grafting the concept of meditation on the freedom of unbelief, freedom of non-religious activities, freedom of non-religious assembly and assembly, and the limits of freedom from religion. And, tentatively named 'freedom of religious meditation' and 'freedom of secular meditation' derived from freedom of religion and freedom from religion are presented. The purpose of this study is to suggest the direction of legal interests by setting the concept of religion and meditation in the Constitution and the scope of protection of the basic rights of religious meditation and secular meditation that may conflict through the interpretation of the Constitution." @default.
• W4366000811 created "2023-04-17" @default.
• W4366000811 creator A5030891208 @default.
• W4366000811 date "2023-03-30" @default.
• W4366000811 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4366000811 title "Constitutional Interpretation of Religious Freedom and Meditation" @default.
• W4366000811 doi "https://doi.org/10.22397/wlri.2023.39.1.365" @default.
• W4366000811 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4366000811 type Work @default.
• W4366000811 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4366000811 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366000811 hasAuthorship W4366000811A5030891208 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C2780565519 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C521822307 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C111472728 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C138885662 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C144024400 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C15744967 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C17744445 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C199539241 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C27206212 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C2776154427 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C2780565519 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C41895202 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C521822307 @default.
• W4366000811 hasConceptScore W4366000811C527412718 @default.
• W4366000811 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4366000811 hasLocation W43660008111 @default.
• W4366000811 hasOpenAccess W4366000811 @default.
• W4366000811 hasPrimaryLocation W43660008111 @default.
• W4366000811 hasRelatedWork W2378523829 @default.
• W4366000811 hasRelatedWork W2379165241 @default.
• W4366000811 hasRelatedWork W2381990564 @default.
• W4366000811 hasRelatedWork W2389527360 @default.
• W4366000811 hasRelatedWork W2565645593 @default.
• W4366000811 hasRelatedWork W2615272113 @default.
• W4366000811 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4366000811 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4366000811 hasRelatedWork W3123534582 @default.
• W4366000811 hasRelatedWork W4321377350 @default.
• W4366000811 hasVolume "39" @default.
• W4366000811 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4366000811 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4366000811 workType "article" @default.