FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366000856> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366000856 endingPage "205" @default.
• W4366000856 startingPage "183" @default.
• W4366000856 abstract "There was a conflict between the judgment of the lower court and the Supreme Court regarding the adequacy of the right of defense granted to public officials in disciplinary proceedings. In other words, the Supreme Court made a judgment 2022du33323 on July 14, 2022, which is against the original trial in the lower court (2020nu52759, sentenced by Seoul High Court, on January 13). the Supreme Court judged that there is a reason not to disclose the victim's personal information and that The disciplinary agency fully guaranteed the right to defend. Also, the Supreme Court judged that the plaintiff knew who the anonymous victims were and there was no problem with the plaintiff's exercise of defense rights. However, the Supreme Court’s judgement, 2022du33323 has the following problems. First of all, it was used as a basis for judging that there was no problem in guaranteeing the plaintiff's right to defense during the disciplinary process due to the fact that there was no objection that the victim was not specified during the disciplinary process. Secondly, It was wrong to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim, citing the situation in which the plaintiff was already aware of the victim while allowing the anonymous treatment of the witness due to the victim's secondary damage. Lastly, It is unfair to cause the plaintiff to fundamentally lose the opportunity to deny his or her disciplinary charges. For this reason, it is thought that a disciplinary agency, the defendant violated the plaintiff's right to defend, and that the Supreme Court's judgment ignored the principle of due process in this case. Paradoxically, 2022du33323 demonstrated the need for institutional supplementation in the following areas of the disciplinary process. Among them, this paper presents three supplementary points. ① First of all, the administrative agency sufficiently informs the person of the right to participate in an attorney until the time of disciplinary action, so that the person subject to disciplinary action is given an opportunity to utilize it. ② Next, The Appeal Review Committee shall facilitate the submission of data by both parties apart from keeping the victim confidential. ③ Lastly, in disciplinary action, the victim's personal information, reasons for disciplinary action, and the contents of disciplinary action must be disclosed to the parties, and the Defendant Administrative Agency must faithfully prove the contents of the disciplinary action. In the end, such institutional improvements are necessary to ensure the principle of due process. by improvements, it is expected that the person subject to disciplinary action will exercise the right to defend more effectively in the disciplinary process and that an appropriate level of relief will be achieved." @default.
• W4366000856 created "2023-04-17" @default.
• W4366000856 creator A5044929369 @default.
• W4366000856 date "2023-03-30" @default.
• W4366000856 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4366000856 title "Thoughts on Guaranteeing the Right to Defense of the Person under Disciplinary Action" @default.
• W4366000856 doi "https://doi.org/10.22397/wlri.2023.39.1.183" @default.
• W4366000856 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4366000856 type Work @default.
• W4366000856 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4366000856 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366000856 hasAuthorship W4366000856A5044929369 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConcept C2776900844 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConcept C8795937 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConceptScore W4366000856C108170787 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConceptScore W4366000856C144024400 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConceptScore W4366000856C17744445 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConceptScore W4366000856C199539241 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConceptScore W4366000856C2776900844 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConceptScore W4366000856C2778272461 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConceptScore W4366000856C36289849 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConceptScore W4366000856C8795937 @default.
• W4366000856 hasConceptScore W4366000856C97460637 @default.
• W4366000856 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4366000856 hasLocation W43660008561 @default.
• W4366000856 hasOpenAccess W4366000856 @default.
• W4366000856 hasPrimaryLocation W43660008561 @default.
• W4366000856 hasRelatedWork W1500458693 @default.
• W4366000856 hasRelatedWork W1567179737 @default.
• W4366000856 hasRelatedWork W2243690638 @default.
• W4366000856 hasRelatedWork W2292058332 @default.
• W4366000856 hasRelatedWork W2577798111 @default.
• W4366000856 hasRelatedWork W2597668198 @default.
• W4366000856 hasRelatedWork W3121581084 @default.
• W4366000856 hasRelatedWork W3123607003 @default.
• W4366000856 hasRelatedWork W3124863869 @default.
• W4366000856 hasRelatedWork W340375381 @default.
• W4366000856 hasVolume "39" @default.
• W4366000856 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4366000856 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4366000856 workType "article" @default.