FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366174820> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366174820 abstract "Purpose Dominant quality standards are present in all industries. Implicit in their use is the assumption that once adopted, there is little or no reason to replace them. However, there is evidence that, under certain circumstances, such standards do get replaced. The reasons for this action are not well-understood, either as they pertain to the displacement decision or to the selection and adoption of the alternative standard. The purpose of this study is to identify and explore these two issues (displacement and replacement) by drawing on data from the American healthcare system. This study is viewed through the theoretical lens of legitimacy theory. In addition, the process is viewed from a temporal perspective. The resulting findings are used to better understand how this displacement process takes place and to identify directions for interesting and meaningful future research. Design/methodology/approach This is an explanatory study that draws on data gathered from quality managers in 89 hospitals that had adopted a new healthcare quality standard (of these, some fifty percent had displaced the dominant quality standard – the Joint Commission – with a different standard – DNV Healthcare. Findings The combined literature review and case study data provide insights into the displacement process. This is a process that evolves over time. Initially, the process is driven by the need to meet customer demands. However, over time, as the organizations try to integrate the guidelines contained within the standards into the organization, gaps in the quality standard emerge. It is these gaps that motivate the need to displace standards. The legitimacy perspective is highly effective at explaining this displacement process. In addition, the study uncovers some critical issues, namely the important role played by the individual auditors in the certification process and the importance of fit between the standard and the context in which it is deployed. Research limitations/implications The data for the propositions in this case study were derived from interviews and survey data from 89 healthcare organizations. It would be interesting to examine similar relationships with other quality standards and industries. Practical implications Our findings provide new insights related to motivations to decouple from a dominant quality standard. Results provide a cautionary tale for standards that hold a dominant market share such that perceived legitimacy of such standards is not as stable as originally thought. Originality/value This study illuminates the fragile nature of the stability of dominant standards and emphasizes the linkages between legitimacy concerns and divestiture of such standards." @default.
• W4366174820 created "2023-04-19" @default.
• W4366174820 creator A5012213630 @default.
• W4366174820 creator A5028975820 @default.
• W4366174820 creator A5039810326 @default.
• W4366174820 creator A5075848121 @default.
• W4366174820 date "2023-04-18" @default.
• W4366174820 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4366174820 title "When a dominant certified management standard is replaced: theoretical insights from the American hospital field" @default.
• W4366174820 cites W1484610502 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W1514278884 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W1965278510 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W1999335715 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2011540886 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2018836107 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2035306811 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2039354463 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2051066739 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2071159026 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2079764749 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2088508036 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2090054320 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2090939332 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2091775201 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2107292295 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2113499237 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2132031545 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2141141142 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2141951329 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2144190226 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2156287990 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2161758970 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2162412465 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2562020581 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2742395924 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2792878976 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2971829326 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W2984026126 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W3121243469 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W3123282572 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W3124615742 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W3125695973 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W3206777315 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W4210828571 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W4238981721 @default.
• W4366174820 cites W4239110531 @default.
• W4366174820 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-03-2022-0209" @default.
• W4366174820 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4366174820 type Work @default.
• W4366174820 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4366174820 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366174820 hasAuthorship W4366174820A5012213630 @default.
• W4366174820 hasAuthorship W4366174820A5028975820 @default.
• W4366174820 hasAuthorship W4366174820A5039810326 @default.
• W4366174820 hasAuthorship W4366174820A5075848121 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C2776034101 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C46295352 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C71405471 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C10138342 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C111472728 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C111919701 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C121332964 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C12713177 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C138885662 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C144133560 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C154945302 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C160735492 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C162324750 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C162853370 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C17744445 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C187736073 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C195094911 @default.
• W4366174820 hasConceptScore W4366174820C199539241 @default.

• next