FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366322495> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366322495 endingPage "e43504" @default.
• W4366322495 startingPage "e43504" @default.
• W4366322495 abstract "Background University students are an at-risk group for the development of eating disorders (EDs); however, many college campuses lack sufficient resources to provide ED specialty care. Students report unique reasons for not seeking ED treatment, including the desire to solve the problem on their own (eg, seeking help from friends, self-medicating, or waiting to see if their problems improve), inability to afford treatment, lack of time to participate in the treatment, fear of seeing their primary care physician, and lack of recognition of their issues as an ED. Mobile health (mHealth) apps may be a cost-effective, helpful adjunctive tool to overcome personal and systemic barriers and encourage help seeking. Objective This paper describes the development, usability, and acceptability of the Building Healthy Eating and Self-Esteem Together for University Students (BEST-U) mHealth smartphone app, which is designed to fill critical gaps in access to ED treatment on college campuses. Methods We undertook a 4-phase iterative development process that focused on user-centered design. The 4 phases included needs assessment based on literature reviews, prototype development and initial evaluation in a pilot trial, redesign, and further pilot-testing to assess the usability and acceptability of the final version of the mHealth app. Acceptability and user satisfaction were assessed using an ad hoc survey that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Results Our needs assessment identified a lack of accessible and affordable treatments for university students. To help meet this need, the BEST-U prototype was designed as an 11-week program that provided interactive, weekly modules that focused on second- and third-wave cognitive behavioral skills. The modules focused on topics such as psychoeducation, reducing thought distortions and body checking, improving body image, interpersonal effectiveness, and behavior chain analysis. The content included interactive quizzes, short answer questions, daily and weekly logs, and surveys completed in the app. BEST-U was paired with brief 25-30 minutes of weekly telehealth coaching sessions provided by a licensed provider or supervised trainee. Pilot-testing revealed minor issues with one module of the app content, which some participants viewed as having low relevance to their experience and therapist concerns about the organization of the app content. These issues were addressed through the removal, addition, and reorganization of BEST-U modules, with the help of therapists-in-training across 2 workshops. The revised version of the BEST-U app had a grand mean acceptability rating of 5.73 out of 7. The participants completed 90.1% (694/770) of the BEST-U modules, indicating high compliance. Conclusions BEST-U is a new, acceptable, and user-friendly mHealth app to help therapists deliver brief, evidence-based cognitive behavioral interventions. Owing to its acceptability and user-friendly nature, BEST-U has high user compliance and holds promise for future implementation and dissemination in university mental health settings." @default.
• W4366322495 created "2023-04-20" @default.
• W4366322495 creator A5003729883 @default.
• W4366322495 creator A5019762180 @default.
• W4366322495 creator A5028887993 @default.
• W4366322495 creator A5034549030 @default.
• W4366322495 creator A5045493733 @default.
• W4366322495 creator A5055000892 @default.
• W4366322495 creator A5065720866 @default.
• W4366322495 creator A5074283053 @default.
• W4366322495 creator A5085070615 @default.
• W4366322495 creator A5090375145 @default.
• W4366322495 date "2023-07-12" @default.
• W4366322495 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4366322495 title "The Building Healthy Eating and Self-Esteem Together for University Students Mobile App to Treat Eating Disorders: User-Centered Research Design and Feasibility Study" @default.
• W4366322495 cites W1825828387 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W1952765564 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W1964608703 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W1970462904 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W1980890237 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W1985388220 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2049931513 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2061664714 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2067444011 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2082605737 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2093980670 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2098064832 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2110479629 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2127064468 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2132996150 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2166523999 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2313507304 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2460182809 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2474187140 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2565385612 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2571658756 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2591729171 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2757019250 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2783993792 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2803769725 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2883144343 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2884815064 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2900401097 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2956009664 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2969573540 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2972813922 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W2978587170 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W3003748831 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W3032290982 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W3044568673 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W3049081262 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W3082581666 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W3088837115 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W3179546534 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W3183032144 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W3203104184 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W4205268398 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W4210914388 @default.
• W4366322495 cites W4377220390 @default.
• W4366322495 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/43504" @default.
• W4366322495 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37436790" @default.
• W4366322495 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4366322495 type Work @default.
• W4366322495 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4366322495 countsByYear W43663224952023 @default.
• W4366322495 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366322495 hasAuthorship W4366322495A5003729883 @default.
• W4366322495 hasAuthorship W4366322495A5019762180 @default.
• W4366322495 hasAuthorship W4366322495A5028887993 @default.
• W4366322495 hasAuthorship W4366322495A5034549030 @default.
• W4366322495 hasAuthorship W4366322495A5045493733 @default.
• W4366322495 hasAuthorship W4366322495A5055000892 @default.
• W4366322495 hasAuthorship W4366322495A5065720866 @default.
• W4366322495 hasAuthorship W4366322495A5074283053 @default.
• W4366322495 hasAuthorship W4366322495A5085070615 @default.
• W4366322495 hasAuthorship W4366322495A5090375145 @default.
• W4366322495 hasBestOaLocation W43663224951 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C186967261 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C2776394216 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C2779363104 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C60952562 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConceptScore W4366322495C107457646 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConceptScore W4366322495C136764020 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConceptScore W4366322495C15744967 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConceptScore W4366322495C159110408 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConceptScore W4366322495C170130773 @default.
• W4366322495 hasConceptScore W4366322495C186967261 @default.

• next