FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366449345> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366449345 endingPage "e070730" @default.
• W4366449345 startingPage "e070730" @default.
• W4366449345 abstract "Abstract Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of surgery compared with non-surgical treatment for sciatica. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from database inception to June 2022. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials comparing any surgical treatment with non-surgical treatment, epidural steroid injections, or placebo or sham surgery, in people with sciatica of any duration due to lumbar disc herniation (diagnosed by radiological imaging). Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted data. Leg pain and disability were the primary outcomes. Adverse events, back pain, quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment were the secondary outcomes. Pain and disability scores were converted to a scale of 0 (no pain or disability) to 100 (worst pain or disability). Data were pooled using a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and certainty of evidence with the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) framework. Follow-up times were into immediate term (≤six weeks), short term (>six weeks and ≤three months), medium term (>three and <12 months), and long term (at 12 months). Results 24 trials were included, half of these investigated the effectiveness of discectomy compared with non-surgical treatment or epidural steroid injections (1711 participants). Very low to low certainty evidence showed that discectomy, compared with non-surgical treatment, reduced leg pain: the effect size was moderate at immediate term (mean difference −12.1 (95% confidence interval −23.6 to −0.5)) and short term (−11.7 (−18.6 to −4.7)), and small at medium term (−6.5 (−11.0 to −2.1)). Negligible effects were noted at long term (−2.3 (−4.5 to −0.2)). For disability, small, negligible, or no effects were found. A similar effect on leg pain was found when comparing discectomy with epidural steroid injections. For disability, a moderate effect was found at short term, but no effect was observed at medium and long term. The risk of any adverse events was similar between discectomy and non-surgical treatment (risk ratio 1.34 (95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.98)). Conclusion Very low to low certainty evidence suggests that discectomy was superior to non-surgical treatment or epidural steroid injections in reducing leg pain and disability in people with sciatica with a surgical indication, but the benefits declined over time. Discectomy might be an option for people with sciatica who feel that the rapid relief offered by discectomy outweighs the risks and costs associated with surgery. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42021269997." @default.
• W4366449345 created "2023-04-22" @default.
• W4366449345 creator A5013711602 @default.
• W4366449345 creator A5018135109 @default.
• W4366449345 creator A5023969133 @default.
• W4366449345 creator A5028324783 @default.
• W4366449345 creator A5033113256 @default.
• W4366449345 creator A5034037597 @default.
• W4366449345 creator A5038231201 @default.
• W4366449345 creator A5056914459 @default.
• W4366449345 creator A5064098570 @default.
• W4366449345 date "2023-04-19" @default.
• W4366449345 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4366449345 title "Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials" @default.
• W4366449345 cites W1585209314 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W1873550943 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W1972600499 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W1987729279 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2014256273 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2029616555 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2043254544 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2060789576 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2070759305 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2071676265 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2081360302 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2081851888 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2083495814 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2097553972 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2107963533 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2111079662 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2131038198 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2137827668 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2141832642 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2148893392 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2153656245 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2157970532 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2163245468 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2165010366 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2166249603 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2167775808 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2182497805 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2202754920 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2318124506 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2395265211 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2406608356 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2414215014 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2464379983 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2605188674 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2606583214 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2737406920 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2743046890 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2746386290 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2761697832 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2776159903 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2783562019 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2786499636 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2808247201 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2811473826 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2966798804 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2972379515 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2972707732 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W2985764155 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W3009043580 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W3011664963 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W3037985079 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W3094315810 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W3118615836 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W3125643582 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W3134737620 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W3137744672 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W3205504649 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W4243249491 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W4295334325 @default.
• W4366449345 cites W4297028803 @default.
• W4366449345 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070730" @default.
• W4366449345 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37076169" @default.
• W4366449345 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4366449345 type Work @default.
• W4366449345 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W4366449345 countsByYear W43664493452023 @default.
• W4366449345 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366449345 hasAuthorship W4366449345A5013711602 @default.
• W4366449345 hasAuthorship W4366449345A5018135109 @default.
• W4366449345 hasAuthorship W4366449345A5023969133 @default.
• W4366449345 hasAuthorship W4366449345A5028324783 @default.
• W4366449345 hasAuthorship W4366449345A5033113256 @default.
• W4366449345 hasAuthorship W4366449345A5034037597 @default.
• W4366449345 hasAuthorship W4366449345A5038231201 @default.
• W4366449345 hasAuthorship W4366449345A5056914459 @default.
• W4366449345 hasAuthorship W4366449345A5064098570 @default.
• W4366449345 hasBestOaLocation W43664493451 @default.
• W4366449345 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4366449345 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4366449345 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4366449345 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4366449345 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4366449345 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4366449345 hasConcept C1862650 @default.

• next