FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366463113> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366463113 endingPage "e38774" @default.
• W4366463113 startingPage "e38774" @default.
• W4366463113 abstract "Mobile phone surveys provide a novel opportunity to collect population-based estimates of public health risk factors; however, nonresponse and low participation challenge the goal of collecting unbiased survey estimates.This study compares the performance of computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) and interactive voice response (IVR) survey modalities for noncommunicable disease risk factors in Bangladesh and Tanzania.This study used secondary data from a randomized crossover trial. Between June 2017 and August 2017, study participants were identified using the random digit dialing method. Mobile phone numbers were randomly allocated to either a CATI or IVR survey. The analysis examined survey completion, contact, response, refusal, and cooperation rates of those who received the CATI and IVR surveys. Differences in survey outcomes between modes were assessed using multilevel, multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for confounding covariates. These analyses were adjusted for clustering effects by mobile network providers.For the CATI surveys, 7044 and 4399 phone numbers were contacted in Bangladesh and Tanzania, respectively, and 60,863 and 51,685 phone numbers, respectively, were contacted for the IVR survey. The total numbers of completed interviews in Bangladesh were 949 for CATI and 1026 for IVR and in Tanzania were 447 for CATI and 801 for IVR. Response rates for CATI were 5.4% (377/7044) in Bangladesh and 8.6% (376/4391) in Tanzania; response rates for IVR were 0.8% (498/60,377) in Bangladesh and 1.1% (586/51,483) in Tanzania. The distribution of the survey population was significantly different from the census distribution. In both countries, IVR respondents were younger, were predominantly male, and had higher education levels than CATI respondents. IVR respondents had a lower response rate than CATI respondents in Bangladesh (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.99) and Tanzania (AOR=0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.60). The cooperation rate was also lower with IVR than with CATI in Bangladesh (AOR=0.12, 95% CI 0.07-0.20) and Tanzania (AOR=0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.56). Both in Bangladesh (AOR=0.33, 95% CI 0.25-0.43) and Tanzania (AOR=0.09, 95% CI 0.06-0.14), there were fewer completed interviews with IVR than with CATI; however, there were more partial interviews with IVR than with CATI in both countries.There were lower completion, response, and cooperation rates with IVR than with CATI in both countries. This finding suggests that, to increase representativeness in certain settings, a selective approach may be needed to design and deploy mobile phone surveys to increase population representativeness. Overall, CATI surveys may offer a promising approach for surveying potentially under-represented groups like women, rural residents, and participants with lower levels of education in some countries." @default.
• W4366463113 created "2023-04-22" @default.
• W4366463113 creator A5001961428 @default.
• W4366463113 creator A5012393778 @default.
• W4366463113 creator A5023177209 @default.
• W4366463113 creator A5025251339 @default.
• W4366463113 creator A5030006278 @default.
• W4366463113 creator A5030813546 @default.
• W4366463113 creator A5032274492 @default.
• W4366463113 creator A5039283015 @default.
• W4366463113 creator A5046811822 @default.
• W4366463113 creator A5055873899 @default.
• W4366463113 date "2023-04-20" @default.
• W4366463113 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4366463113 title "Effect of the Data Collection Method on Mobile Phone Survey Participation in Bangladesh and Tanzania: Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Crossover Trial" @default.
• W4366463113 cites W1930475762 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W1973114032 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2007954468 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2022906735 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2063789146 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2085145750 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2090493081 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2101598151 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2107296679 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2108171260 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2127336112 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2127682847 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2527824850 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2610476716 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2610802061 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2610865250 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2611748735 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2611775094 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2611937863 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2794025069 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2909478599 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2937676480 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2969461257 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2972059461 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W2994611897 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W3176464889 @default.
• W4366463113 cites W3178295071 @default.
• W4366463113 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/38774" @default.
• W4366463113 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37079373" @default.
• W4366463113 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4366463113 type Work @default.
• W4366463113 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4366463113 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366463113 hasAuthorship W4366463113A5001961428 @default.
• W4366463113 hasAuthorship W4366463113A5012393778 @default.
• W4366463113 hasAuthorship W4366463113A5023177209 @default.
• W4366463113 hasAuthorship W4366463113A5025251339 @default.
• W4366463113 hasAuthorship W4366463113A5030006278 @default.
• W4366463113 hasAuthorship W4366463113A5030813546 @default.
• W4366463113 hasAuthorship W4366463113A5032274492 @default.
• W4366463113 hasAuthorship W4366463113A5039283015 @default.
• W4366463113 hasAuthorship W4366463113A5046811822 @default.
• W4366463113 hasAuthorship W4366463113A5055873899 @default.
• W4366463113 hasBestOaLocation W43664631131 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C2777421447 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C2777858628 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C2778707766 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C2779357621 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C60034152 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C126322002 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C138885662 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C144024400 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C149923435 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C151956035 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C205649164 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C2777421447 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C2777858628 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C2778707766 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C2779357621 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C2908647359 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C41008148 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C41895202 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C60034152 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C71924100 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C76155785 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C91375879 @default.
• W4366463113 hasConceptScore W4366463113C99454951 @default.
• W4366463113 hasLocation W43664631131 @default.
• W4366463113 hasLocation W43664631132 @default.
• W4366463113 hasLocation W43664631133 @default.

• next