FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366657988> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366657988 endingPage "482" @default.
• W4366657988 startingPage "469" @default.
• W4366657988 abstract "Purpose: The clinical outcome of the revision surgery for the failed Bankart repair is not well known. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze a series of patients with recurrent instability after primary Bankart repair that were revised arthroscopically using a suture-anchor technique. Type of Study: Prospective, nonrandomized outcome study. Methods: Twenty-three patients with failed Bankart repair were treated with arthroscopic surgery and were followed up for a mean of 36 months (range, 24-52 months; SD, 9 months). There were 21 men and 2 women with the mean age of 24 years (range, 17-34 years; SD, 4.4 years). Eight patients had previously received an open Bankart repair (5 transosseous-suture technique, 3 suture-anchor technique), and 15 had received an arthroscopic repair (10 transglenoid multiple-suture technique, 5 suture-anchor technique). The revision surgery included repair of the anterior labrum using suture anchors and nonabsorbable sutures, capsular plication, and proximal shift of the inferior capsule with or without closure of the rotator interval. The characteristics of the patients, possible modes of failure, surgical findings, shoulder scores (University of California at Los Angeles [UCLA] scale, Simple Shoulder Test, and Rowe score), and clinical outcome were evaluated. Results: Recurrent instability developed at a mean of 21 months (range, 11-39 months; SD, 8 months) after the initial stabilization. A possible cause of failure in 5 patients was a nonanatomic repair, with the labral tissue fixed proximal or medial to the glenoid margin. At the follow-up, 15 patients had excellent results, 4 good, 3 fair, and 1 poor, according to the UCLA scale. The mean Rowe score improved from 87.3 (range, 30-100; SD, 12.6) to 91.2 (range, 40-100; SD, 14.2) (P =.023). The Simple Shoulder Test responses improved from 8 yes responses preoperatively to 11 postoperatively. Eighteen patients achieved an activity return of more than 90% of preinjury level. Five patients had recurrence after revision surgery (1 frank dislocation, 2 subluxation, 2 positive anterior apprehension sign). Engagement in contact sports was correlated with the recurrence (r =.683, P =.003). With the number available, no significant difference could be detected in the outcome between the types of the primary surgery. Arthroscopic revision Bankart repair did not result in any additional loss of external rotation compared with the contralateral side (P =.723). The most predictable factor for the functional return was preoperative range of external rotation (r =.793, P =.001). Conclusions: Arthroscopic revision Bankart surgery using suture anchors can provide a satisfactory outcome, including a low recurrence rate and reliable functional return, in carefully selected patients. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 18, No 5 (May-June), 2002: pp 469–482" @default.
• W4366657988 created "2023-04-23" @default.
• W4366657988 creator A5012770069 @default.
• W4366657988 creator A5071690557 @default.
• W4366657988 creator A5078026315 @default.
• W4366657988 date "2002-05-01" @default.
• W4366657988 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4366657988 title "Arthroscopic revision Bankart repair" @default.
• W4366657988 cites W174538530 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W1769567006 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W1839103413 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W1845115421 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W1895700243 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W1919654699 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W1964773994 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W1983106274 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2009556230 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2015575438 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2032237710 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2034741909 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2042568740 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2052684738 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2067132303 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2080372800 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2094006986 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2096197839 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2096287242 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2122215420 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2122685145 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2122831384 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2130238026 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2134062270 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2153031433 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2235894342 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2243207040 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W2298157275 @default.
• W4366657988 cites W4293079514 @default.
• W4366657988 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.32230" @default.
• W4366657988 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W4366657988 type Work @default.
• W4366657988 citedByCount "81" @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882012 @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882013 @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882014 @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882015 @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882017 @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882018 @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882019 @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882020 @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882021 @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882022 @default.
• W4366657988 countsByYear W43666579882023 @default.
• W4366657988 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366657988 hasAuthorship W4366657988A5012770069 @default.
• W4366657988 hasAuthorship W4366657988A5071690557 @default.
• W4366657988 hasAuthorship W4366657988A5078026315 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConcept C2775889985 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConcept C2776986050 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConcept C2780879209 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConceptScore W4366657988C141071460 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConceptScore W4366657988C188816634 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConceptScore W4366657988C2775889985 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConceptScore W4366657988C2776511800 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConceptScore W4366657988C2776986050 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConceptScore W4366657988C2777327002 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConceptScore W4366657988C2779162959 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConceptScore W4366657988C2780879209 @default.
• W4366657988 hasConceptScore W4366657988C71924100 @default.
• W4366657988 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4366657988 hasLocation W43666579881 @default.
• W4366657988 hasOpenAccess W4366657988 @default.
• W4366657988 hasPrimaryLocation W43666579881 @default.
• W4366657988 hasRelatedWork W153798224 @default.
• W4366657988 hasRelatedWork W1975483559 @default.
• W4366657988 hasRelatedWork W1977383980 @default.
• W4366657988 hasRelatedWork W1997987437 @default.
• W4366657988 hasRelatedWork W2010832993 @default.
• W4366657988 hasRelatedWork W2012294409 @default.
• W4366657988 hasRelatedWork W2367673907 @default.
• W4366657988 hasRelatedWork W2523854750 @default.
• W4366657988 hasRelatedWork W4285022635 @default.
• W4366657988 hasRelatedWork W2036429646 @default.
• W4366657988 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W4366657988 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4366657988 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4366657988 workType "article" @default.