FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366706071> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366706071 endingPage "279" @default.
• W4366706071 startingPage "236" @default.
• W4366706071 abstract "The purpose of this study was to analyze PhD students' beliefs about writing and how they rated their writing abilities. The Writing Process Questionnaire was established to acquire a deeper grasp of the perspectives held by PhD students toward academic writing. The results of this survey were analyzed to determine how PhD students perceive academic writing. It was interesting to study whether or not there was a connection between the perceptions of writing held by PhD students and the mental health of those persons. This was another exciting aspect of the research. 669 PhD students attending a prestigious university in Finland volunteered their time to respond to a questionnaire. The university in question is the University of Helsinki. In the current study, 26 questions were used to produce sum variables. These sum variables were then used to develop six distinct theoretical constructs, which were measured using various scales. Blocks, procrastination, perfectionism, intrinsic ability, knowledge transformation, and productivity were the names given to the various structures that were up for discussion.&#x0D; A few examples of these ideas include production, overcoming challenges, striving for excellence, and an individual's intrinsic potential. A confirmatory factor analysis, often known as a CFA, was carried out to verify the six-dimensional notion. The relationship between perfectionism, procrastination, and blockages positively correlates with all of these elements (exhaustion, stress, worry, and a general lack of interest) but negatively correlates with productivity. This is because perfectionism, procrastination, and blockages positively correlate with all of these elements except productivity. The validity of the writing scale's six-factor structure, which evaluates writing skill, was established by employing LISREL for either confirmatory research or analysis. This allowed for the establishment of the scale's validity. As a result, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument capable of accurately capturing a number of essential facets of the academic writing process, including the emotional components of this process. This conclusion can be reached as a consequence of the fact that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument." @default.
• W4366706071 created "2023-04-24" @default.
• W4366706071 creator A5009162537 @default.
• W4366706071 date "2021-12-10" @default.
• W4366706071 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W4366706071 title "How can academic writing conceptions of PhD students be measured, and how do they relate to wellbeing?" @default.
• W4366706071 doi "https://doi.org/10.58213/education.v3i2.31" @default.
• W4366706071 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4366706071 type Work @default.
• W4366706071 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4366706071 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366706071 hasAuthorship W4366706071A5009162537 @default.
• W4366706071 hasBestOaLocation W43667060711 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C194279344 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C2777278965 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C2777352838 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C2779978724 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C111472728 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C118552586 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C138885662 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C139719470 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C145420912 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C15744967 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C162324750 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C194279344 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C204983608 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C2777278965 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C2777352838 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C2779978724 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C558461103 @default.
• W4366706071 hasConceptScore W4366706071C77805123 @default.
• W4366706071 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4366706071 hasLocation W43667060711 @default.
• W4366706071 hasOpenAccess W4366706071 @default.
• W4366706071 hasPrimaryLocation W43667060711 @default.
• W4366706071 hasRelatedWork W1966783231 @default.
• W4366706071 hasRelatedWork W2060396724 @default.
• W4366706071 hasRelatedWork W2079787312 @default.
• W4366706071 hasRelatedWork W2595156067 @default.
• W4366706071 hasRelatedWork W2609477229 @default.
• W4366706071 hasRelatedWork W2901322668 @default.
• W4366706071 hasRelatedWork W2922173959 @default.
• W4366706071 hasRelatedWork W2941100543 @default.
• W4366706071 hasRelatedWork W3038105515 @default.
• W4366706071 hasRelatedWork W3122262642 @default.
• W4366706071 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W4366706071 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4366706071 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4366706071 workType "article" @default.