FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366707314> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366707314 endingPage "447" @default.
• W4366707314 startingPage "381" @default.
• W4366707314 abstract "Modeling, exhibiting, and expressing the cognitive processes involved in writing has been demonstrated to be advantageous to students in terms of helping them develop their writing abilities. Research has shown that this is beneficial to the students. Demonstrating and describing the mental processes engaged during the act of writing is one of the numerous definitions that may be given for the term modeling. Examining certain pedagogical features of teaching with models has gotten a far lower amount of attention and effort than other parts of this research. We present a paradigm for teaching thinking and writing models, which gives educators and researchers fresh insights into the modeling activity that is unique to several academic subjects. This paradigm may be applied to the teaching of thinking and writing models. This is the location of the paradigm in question. This may be completed by relying on previous English Language Arts research and using it in inquiry contexts relevant to social studies. This can be done by drawing on previous research carried out in English Language Arts. In this piece, we will discuss the instructional approach we have built for teaching writing and thinking models, and we will focus on how we use it. The investigation that was carried out in English Language Arts was utilized in the process of constructing this framework. This structure considers three pedagogical approaches:demonstrating and explaining demonstrating and cooperating with students on constructing model texts using models as a teaching tool (either a tool or a book)&#x0D; The author then examines eleven instructional strategies; all focused on enabling training across various educational contexts and methods. This leads to the next section. In order to demonstrate how two distinct educators use these practices throughout all three modes of teaching, we analyze the data gathered over three years of social studies education and collect it over three years. The information was gathered during the duration of a student's first, second, and third years of study in the social sciences. By highlighting how disciplinary thinking and processes enable writing social studies arguments with sources, our goal is to demonstrate how students can actively engage in teaching writing by using models. Our goal is to show how students can actively engage in teaching writing in various ways. We will accomplish both goals by highlighting how disciplinary thinking and processes enable writing social studies arguments with sources. In addition to this, we take into account the role that the training is supposed to play in the completion of this assignment. Finally, we highlight the framework's potential to guide the work of academics and practitioners on writing instruction in various disciplinary contexts by demonstrating how writing instruction may be applied to address disciplinary ways of thinking in social studies. This is done to highlight the potential of the framework to guide the work of academics and practitioners on writing instruction in various disciplinary contexts. This illustrates that the framework may be used in various scenarios in different fields of study. As a result, we are in a position to emphasize the framework's potential for directing the work of academics and practitioners on writing education across various disciplinary contexts." @default.
• W4366707314 created "2023-04-24" @default.
• W4366707314 creator A5065498785 @default.
• W4366707314 date "2019-06-10" @default.
• W4366707314 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W4366707314 title "Middle school social studies models of disciplinary argumentation instruction: a framework for encouraging writing growth" @default.
• W4366707314 doi "https://doi.org/10.58213/education.v1i1.9" @default.
• W4366707314 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W4366707314 type Work @default.
• W4366707314 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4366707314 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366707314 hasAuthorship W4366707314A5065498785 @default.
• W4366707314 hasBestOaLocation W43667073141 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C187179951 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C192209626 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C207700645 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C2779765252 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C2781341000 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C65059942 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C70789860 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C8795937 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C111919701 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C120665830 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C121332964 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C138885662 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C144024400 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C145420912 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C15744967 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C169760540 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C169900460 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C17744445 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C187179951 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C192209626 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C19417346 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C199539241 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C207700645 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C2779765252 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C2781341000 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C36289849 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C41008148 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C41895202 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C65059942 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C70789860 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C8795937 @default.
• W4366707314 hasConceptScore W4366707314C98045186 @default.
• W4366707314 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4366707314 hasLocation W43667073141 @default.
• W4366707314 hasOpenAccess W4366707314 @default.
• W4366707314 hasPrimaryLocation W43667073141 @default.
• W4366707314 hasRelatedWork W1526858436 @default.
• W4366707314 hasRelatedWork W1946102334 @default.
• W4366707314 hasRelatedWork W2068206231 @default.
• W4366707314 hasRelatedWork W2093862808 @default.
• W4366707314 hasRelatedWork W2348108705 @default.
• W4366707314 hasRelatedWork W2353936898 @default.
• W4366707314 hasRelatedWork W2385923795 @default.
• W4366707314 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4366707314 hasRelatedWork W3140890135 @default.
• W4366707314 hasRelatedWork W2911331336 @default.
• W4366707314 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W4366707314 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4366707314 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4366707314 workType "article" @default.