FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366742136> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366742136 endingPage "4479" @default.
• W4366742136 startingPage "4466" @default.
• W4366742136 abstract "Abstract Purpose A novel compensator‐based system has been proposed which delivers intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with cobalt‐60 beams. This could improve access to advanced radiotherapy in low‐ and middle‐income countries. For this system to be clinically viable and to be adapted into the Radiation Planning Assistant (RPA), being developed to offer automated planning services in low‐ and middle‐income countries, it is necessary to commission and validate it in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). Methods The novel treatment device considered here employs a cobalt‐60 source and nine compensators. Each compensator is produced by 3‐D printing a thin plastic mold which is then filled on‐demand within the machine with reusable 2‐mm‐diameter spherical tungsten balls. This system was commissioned in the Eclipse TPS and validation tests were conducted with Monte Carlo using Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission for percentage depth dose, in‐plane profiles, penumbra, and IMRT dose validation. And the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 119 benchmarking testing was performed. Additionally, compensator‐based cobalt‐60 IMRT plans were created for 46 head‐and‐neck cancer cases and compared to the linac‐based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans used clinically, then dosimetric parameters were evaluated. Beam‐on time for each field was calculated. In addition, the measurement was also performed in a limited environment and compared with the Monte Carlo simulations. Results The differences in percent depth doses and in‐plane profiles between the Eclipse and Monte Carlo simulations were 0.65% ± 0.41% and 1.02% ± 0.99%, respectively, and the 80%–20% penumbra agreed within 0.46 ± 0.27 mm. For the Task Group 119 validation plans, all treatment planning goals were met and gamma passing rates were >95% (3%/3 mm criteria). In 46 clinical head‐and‐neck cases, the cobalt‐60 compensator‐based IMRT plans had planning target volume (PTV) coverages similar to linac‐based VMAT plans: all dosimetric values for PTV were within 1.5%. The organs at risk dose parameters were somewhat higher in cobalt‐60 compensator‐based IMRT plans versus linac‐based VMAT plans. The mean dose differences for the spinal cord, brain, and brainstem were 4.43 ± 1.92, 3.39 ± 4.67, and 2.40 ± 3.71 Gy, while those for the rest of the organs were <1 Gy. The average beam‐on time per field was 0.42 ± 0.10 min for the 6 MV multi‐leaf‐collimator plans while those for the cobalt‐60 compensator plans were 0.17 ± 0.01 and 0.31 ± 0.01 min at the dose rates of 350 and 175 cGy/min. There was a good agreement between in‐plane profiles from measurements and Monte Carlo simulations, which differences are 1.34 ± 1.90% and 0.13 ± 2.16% for two different fields. Conclusions A novel compensator‐based IMRT system using cobalt‐60 beams was commissioned and validated in a commercial TPS. Plan quality with this system was comparable to that of linac‐based plans in all test cases with shorter estimated beam‐on times. This system enables reliable, high‐quality plans with reduced cost and complexity and may have benefits for underserved regions of the world. This system is being integrated into the RPA, a web‐based platform for auto‐contouring and auto‐planning." @default.
• W4366742136 created "2023-04-24" @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5003218151 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5007076214 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5011402246 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5018069493 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5026368123 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5031020692 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5036130519 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5040455603 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5045832666 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5075819226 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5077591167 @default.
• W4366742136 creator A5090538273 @default.
• W4366742136 date "2023-04-22" @default.
• W4366742136 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W4366742136 title "Commissioning and dosimetric validation of a novel compensator‐based Co‐60 IMRT system for evaluating suitability to automated treatment planning" @default.
• W4366742136 cites W1595536914 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W1976094262 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W1991573209 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W1993369777 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2019247782 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2038526639 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2039569655 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2042121705 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2071786042 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2099805608 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2109256707 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2110300952 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2120950852 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2123589301 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2138884296 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2157574949 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2233319185 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2461203026 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2544342548 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2549168387 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2579489187 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2625620921 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2739774018 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2758311723 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2793872466 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2798251345 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2804929522 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2889843738 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2895926103 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2896102872 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2909247290 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2916802298 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2939238843 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W2969219137 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W3044958767 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W3092005003 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W3130968290 @default.
• W4366742136 cites W3134010242 @default.
• W4366742136 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16423" @default.
• W4366742136 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37086040" @default.
• W4366742136 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4366742136 type Work @default.
• W4366742136 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4366742136 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5003218151 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5007076214 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5011402246 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5018069493 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5026368123 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5031020692 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5036130519 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5040455603 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5045832666 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5075819226 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5077591167 @default.
• W4366742136 hasAuthorship W4366742136A5090538273 @default.
• W4366742136 hasBestOaLocation W43667421361 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C168834538 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C180048950 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C2778505590 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C44154836 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConceptScore W4366742136C104293457 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConceptScore W4366742136C105795698 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConceptScore W4366742136C120665830 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConceptScore W4366742136C121332964 @default.
• W4366742136 hasConceptScore W4366742136C126838900 @default.

• next