FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366754143> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366754143 abstract "Reoperative pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) can be technically challenging and is associated with greater morbidity and lower success rates than an initial repair. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) previously has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective approach for management of recurrent UPJO; however, the length of follow-up has been limited. The objective of this study was to confirm the safety and efficacy of RALP for UPJO in children following failed previous pyeloplasty and provide clinical benchmarks for intermediate length follow-up in this patient population.An IRB approved retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing reoperative RALP from June 2006 to December 2014. All cases were performed by surgeons from two institutions for persistent UPJO following failed initial pyeloplasty. Information including demographic information, radiographic studies, and operative interventions performed between the initial repair and reoperative surgery, reoperative RALP intraoperative data, postoperative clinical course and imaging studies, and subsequent interventions following reoperative RALP were extracted.Twenty-three children underwent reoperative RALP. Eleven patients had right- and 12 left-sided repairs. Median age at reoperative RALP was 4.0 years and median interval between surgeries was 1.3 years. Indications for repeat repair included pain, infection, and/or radiographic evidence of worsening obstruction and/or deteriorating renal function. Mean operative time was 198 min from incision to port closure. Mean length of stay was 2.3 days. Six complications occurred in five patients within 30 days postoperatively, including ileus, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection. Median length of follow-up was 26 months (range 4–45 months) for all patients and 31 months (range 16–45 months) in 18 patients with >12 months of follow-up. More than 80% of patients presenting with flank pain prior to reoperative RALP had resolution of this symptom. To date, 78% of patients with >12 months of follow-up have not required further operative intervention. Excellent results have been achieved in 14 of 18 patients (78%) with sufficient postoperative follow-up in terms of length of follow-up (>12 months), symptom resolution, and/or improved imaging results.RALP following previous pyeloplasty is technically feasible with acceptable operative times, lengths of stay, and complication rates. Reoperative RALP is our preferred modality for repair of recurrent UPJO with the vast majority of patients having successful outcomes based on imaging, resolution of symptoms, and the rare need for further intervention across an intermediate length follow-up period." @default.
• W4366754143 created "2023-04-24" @default.
• W4366754143 creator A5002369232 @default.
• W4366754143 creator A5025441151 @default.
• W4366754143 creator A5038270263 @default.
• W4366754143 creator A5049812746 @default.
• W4366754143 creator A5066075110 @default.
• W4366754143 date "2023-04-01" @default.
• W4366754143 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4366754143 title "What would be the ideal pathway for a young urologist interested in kidney transplantation?" @default.
• W4366754143 cites W3036428147 @default.
• W4366754143 cites W4282980793 @default.
• W4366754143 cites W2101904483 @default.
• W4366754143 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.04.011" @default.
• W4366754143 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37094628" @default.
• W4366754143 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4366754143 type Work @default.
• W4366754143 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4366754143 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366754143 hasAuthorship W4366754143A5002369232 @default.
• W4366754143 hasAuthorship W4366754143A5025441151 @default.
• W4366754143 hasAuthorship W4366754143A5038270263 @default.
• W4366754143 hasAuthorship W4366754143A5049812746 @default.
• W4366754143 hasAuthorship W4366754143A5066075110 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConcept C2777626661 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConcept C2781040948 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConcept C2993461684 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConceptScore W4366754143C126322002 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConceptScore W4366754143C141071460 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConceptScore W4366754143C167135981 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConceptScore W4366754143C2777626661 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConceptScore W4366754143C2780047204 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConceptScore W4366754143C2781040948 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConceptScore W4366754143C2993461684 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConceptScore W4366754143C61434518 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConceptScore W4366754143C71924100 @default.
• W4366754143 hasConceptScore W4366754143C77411442 @default.
• W4366754143 hasLocation W43667541431 @default.
• W4366754143 hasLocation W43667541432 @default.
• W4366754143 hasOpenAccess W4366754143 @default.
• W4366754143 hasPrimaryLocation W43667541431 @default.
• W4366754143 hasRelatedWork W1998146528 @default.
• W4366754143 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W4366754143 hasRelatedWork W2008859674 @default.
• W4366754143 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W4366754143 hasRelatedWork W2088566412 @default.
• W4366754143 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W4366754143 hasRelatedWork W2129194407 @default.
• W4366754143 hasRelatedWork W2164219929 @default.
• W4366754143 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W4366754143 hasRelatedWork W4312290883 @default.
• W4366754143 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4366754143 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4366754143 workType "article" @default.