Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366810032> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- W4366810032 endingPage "40" @default.
- W4366810032 startingPage "24" @default.
- W4366810032 abstract "A recent trend in Russell scholarship has been towards the thesis that, contrary to his own recollections, Bertrand Russell really didn’t need the 1905 theory of descriptions to deflate an excessive ontology, because (1) there was no excessive ontology in The Principles of Mathematics, at least not one with golden mountains and the like, and so (2) Russell’s real motive, at least his main one, was not ontological but rather was to replace the incoherent sense-reference distinction on which the old theory of denoting depended. I want to gently dispute that thesis by showing that Russell’s old theory in Principles was ambivalent on ontic commitment to non-existent things and it could not give an adequate account of the central problem which Russell faced before “On Denoting”, viz. our apparent discourse—including our ability to make true and false propositions— about non-existent things. I also show briefly how the new theory solves the old problem." @default.
- W4366810032 created "2023-04-25" @default.
- W4366810032 creator A5046839688 @default.
- W4366810032 date "2007-06-01" @default.
- W4366810032 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W4366810032 title "Why “On Denoting”?" @default.
- W4366810032 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/rss.2007.0012" @default.
- W4366810032 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W4366810032 type Work @default.
- W4366810032 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W4366810032 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4366810032 hasAuthorship W4366810032A5046839688 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConcept C162127614 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConcept C25810664 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConcept C2778236678 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConceptScore W4366810032C111472728 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConceptScore W4366810032C138885662 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConceptScore W4366810032C15744967 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConceptScore W4366810032C162127614 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConceptScore W4366810032C17744445 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConceptScore W4366810032C199539241 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConceptScore W4366810032C25810664 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConceptScore W4366810032C2778061430 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConceptScore W4366810032C2778236678 @default.
- W4366810032 hasConceptScore W4366810032C77805123 @default.
- W4366810032 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W4366810032 hasLocation W43668100321 @default.
- W4366810032 hasOpenAccess W4366810032 @default.
- W4366810032 hasPrimaryLocation W43668100321 @default.
- W4366810032 hasRelatedWork W1490071408 @default.
- W4366810032 hasRelatedWork W2267411702 @default.
- W4366810032 hasRelatedWork W2504000783 @default.
- W4366810032 hasRelatedWork W2580891685 @default.
- W4366810032 hasRelatedWork W3160366707 @default.
- W4366810032 hasRelatedWork W4247955791 @default.
- W4366810032 hasRelatedWork W4320494227 @default.
- W4366810032 hasRelatedWork W99028641 @default.
- W4366810032 hasRelatedWork W2005581807 @default.
- W4366810032 hasRelatedWork W2143101361 @default.
- W4366810032 hasVolume "27" @default.
- W4366810032 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4366810032 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4366810032 workType "article" @default.