Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366817651> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 83 of
83
with 100 items per page.
- W4366817651 endingPage "407" @default.
- W4366817651 startingPage "400" @default.
- W4366817651 abstract "Online peer assessment platforms aim to improve the accuracy of peer scores (numerical scores based on a rubric) and hold students accountable for peer feedback (written comments). We evaluated the validity of peer scores and peer feedback using the online platform, Kritik. The course was a two-credit hour online infectious diseases pharmacotherapy elective consisting of twelve third-year students enrolled in a four-year doctor of pharmacy program. Students analyzed patient cases and created video presentations of their therapeutic care plan weekly. Each student scored three peers' presentations using a rubric and provided peer feedback in Kritik. The instructor independently scored the presentations. The students' presentation scores, which was the weighted average of three peers' scores, was compared to the instructor's score. Students also rated the peer feedback they received using two Likert-type scales (feedback-on-feedback [FoF] ratings). Two faculty rated 97 randomly selected peer feedback (written comments) and recorded their FoF ratings separately. Students completed an anonymous course evaluation and exit survey. The Pearson correlation coefficient between weighted peer scores and instructor scores for 91 presentations was r = 0.880. There was fair agreement in FoF ratings between students and faculty based on weighted kappa. All students would recommend the course and had a positive experience with peer assessment and the platform. Weighted peer scores strongly correlated with instructor scores, and students held each other accountable for peer feedback in Kritik. Our findings should be confirmed in different contexts and settings." @default.
- W4366817651 created "2023-04-25" @default.
- W4366817651 creator A5018447225 @default.
- W4366817651 creator A5032789828 @default.
- W4366817651 creator A5046303631 @default.
- W4366817651 creator A5063835174 @default.
- W4366817651 date "2023-04-01" @default.
- W4366817651 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W4366817651 title "Assessment of the validity of peer scores and peer feedback in an online peer assessment platform (Kritik)" @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2091931022 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2127890855 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2131915193 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2141413057 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2164777277 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2342115973 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2535628851 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2596072174 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2611357751 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2626768306 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2793350103 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2948588714 @default.
- W4366817651 cites W2996399622 @default.
- W4366817651 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2023.04.004" @default.
- W4366817651 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37100727" @default.
- W4366817651 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4366817651 type Work @default.
- W4366817651 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4366817651 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4366817651 hasAuthorship W4366817651A5018447225 @default.
- W4366817651 hasAuthorship W4366817651A5032789828 @default.
- W4366817651 hasAuthorship W4366817651A5046303631 @default.
- W4366817651 hasAuthorship W4366817651A5063835174 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C111640148 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C2988746165 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C42058189 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C53839665 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C104863432 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C105776082 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C111640148 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C120912362 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C138496976 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C145420912 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C15744967 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C17744445 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C199539241 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C2988746165 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C42058189 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C509550671 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C512399662 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C53839665 @default.
- W4366817651 hasConceptScore W4366817651C71924100 @default.
- W4366817651 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W4366817651 hasLocation W43668176511 @default.
- W4366817651 hasLocation W43668176512 @default.
- W4366817651 hasOpenAccess W4366817651 @default.
- W4366817651 hasPrimaryLocation W43668176511 @default.
- W4366817651 hasRelatedWork W2082308968 @default.
- W4366817651 hasRelatedWork W2135023602 @default.
- W4366817651 hasRelatedWork W2596737561 @default.
- W4366817651 hasRelatedWork W2612204789 @default.
- W4366817651 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W4366817651 hasRelatedWork W2997090855 @default.
- W4366817651 hasRelatedWork W4366817651 @default.
- W4366817651 hasRelatedWork W4378086511 @default.
- W4366817651 hasRelatedWork W4385431779 @default.
- W4366817651 hasRelatedWork W4385718360 @default.
- W4366817651 hasVolume "15" @default.
- W4366817651 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4366817651 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4366817651 workType "article" @default.