FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366991575> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366991575 abstract "Abstract Background Using infrared counters is a promising unobtrusive method of assessing footfall in urban parks. However, infrared counters are susceptible to reliability and validity issues, and there is limited guidance for their use. The aims of this study were to (1) determine how many weeks of automated active infrared count data would provide behaviourally stable estimates of urban park footfall for each meteorological season, and (2) determine the validity of automated active infrared count estimates of footfall in comparison to direct manual observation counts. Methods Three automated active infrared counters collected daily footfall counts for 365 days on three footpaths in an urban park within Northampton, England, between May 2021 – May 2022. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to compare the behavioural stability of abbreviated data collection schedules with total median footfall within each meteorological season (Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter). Public holidays, events, and extreme outliers were removed. Ten one-hour manual observations were conducted at the site of an infrared counter to determine the validity of the infrared counter. Results At least four-weeks (28 days) of infrared counts are required to provide ‘good’ to ‘excellent’ (Intraclass correlation > 0.75, > 0.9, respectively) estimates of median daily footfall per meteorological season in an urban park. Infrared counters had, on average, -4.65 counts per hour (95% LoA -12.4, 3.14; Mean absolute percentage error 13.7%) lower counts compared to manual observation counts during one-hour observation periods (23.2 ± 15.6, 27.9 ± 18.9 counts per hour, respectively). Infrared counts explained 98% of the variance in manual observation counts. The number of groups during an observation period explained 78% of the variance in the difference between infrared and manual counts. Conclusions Abbreviated data collection schedules can still obtain estimates of urban park footfall. Automated active infrared counts are strongly associated with manual counts; however, they tend to underestimate footfall, often due to people in groups. Methodological and practical recommendations are provided." @default.
• W4366991575 created "2023-04-27" @default.
• W4366991575 creator A5001310281 @default.
• W4366991575 creator A5074339524 @default.
• W4366991575 date "2023-04-25" @default.
• W4366991575 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W4366991575 title "Using automated active infrared counters to estimate footfall on urban park footpaths: behavioural stability and validity testing" @default.
• W4366991575 cites W1992608771 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2004818359 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2023054179 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2034564500 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2080631120 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2103886768 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2110904269 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2126422123 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2133750711 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2136608905 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2145458276 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2169281914 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2290366570 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2327037637 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2529266118 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W2957118956 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W3027919157 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W3046640293 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W3138681011 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W3178506526 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W4200074420 @default.
• W4366991575 cites W4247401976 @default.
• W4366991575 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01438-w" @default.
• W4366991575 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37098627" @default.
• W4366991575 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4366991575 type Work @default.
• W4366991575 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4366991575 countsByYear W43669915752023 @default.
• W4366991575 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366991575 hasAuthorship W4366991575A5001310281 @default.
• W4366991575 hasAuthorship W4366991575A5074339524 @default.
• W4366991575 hasBestOaLocation W43669915751 @default.
• W4366991575 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W4366991575 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4366991575 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4366991575 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W4366991575 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W4366991575 hasConceptScore W4366991575C104709138 @default.
• W4366991575 hasConceptScore W4366991575C105795698 @default.
• W4366991575 hasConceptScore W4366991575C33923547 @default.
• W4366991575 hasConceptScore W4366991575C39432304 @default.
• W4366991575 hasConceptScore W4366991575C9893847 @default.
• W4366991575 hasFunder F4320311700 @default.
• W4366991575 hasFunder F4320311904 @default.
• W4366991575 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4366991575 hasLocation W43669915751 @default.
• W4366991575 hasLocation W43669915752 @default.
• W4366991575 hasLocation W43669915753 @default.
• W4366991575 hasLocation W43669915754 @default.
• W4366991575 hasOpenAccess W4366991575 @default.
• W4366991575 hasPrimaryLocation W43669915751 @default.
• W4366991575 hasRelatedWork W2019224040 @default.
• W4366991575 hasRelatedWork W2049502031 @default.
• W4366991575 hasRelatedWork W2068879314 @default.
• W4366991575 hasRelatedWork W2078206230 @default.
• W4366991575 hasRelatedWork W2119158312 @default.
• W4366991575 hasRelatedWork W2552050053 @default.
• W4366991575 hasRelatedWork W2581231071 @default.
• W4366991575 hasRelatedWork W3112967488 @default.
• W4366991575 hasRelatedWork W3124656918 @default.
• W4366991575 hasRelatedWork W3124817100 @default.
• W4366991575 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W4366991575 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4366991575 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4366991575 workType "article" @default.