FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4366996652> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4366996652 endingPage "106" @default.
• W4366996652 startingPage "99" @default.
• W4366996652 abstract "To assess the mechanical performance and enamel-crack propensity of large MOD composite-resin restorations on maxillary molars with severely undermined cusps.Thirty-six extracted maxillary third molars (n = 12) received a standardized slot-type MOD preparation (5-mm depth by 5-mm bucco-palatal width) with severe undercuts, leaving unsupported buccal and lingual enamel cusps. A short-fiber reinforced composite resin base (SFRC, everX Flow, GC) was used for both the experimental direct approach and semi-direct CAD/CAM inlays (Cerasmart 270, GC). In the control group using a direct approach, Gradia Direct (GC) composite resin was used alone without SFRC. Optibond FL (Kerr) adhesive was used in all three groups (also for the immediate dentin sealing of inlays). Artificial masticatory forces were simulated under water using closed-loop servo-hydraulics (MTS Acumen 3). Each specimen was mounted at a 30-degree angle and positioned so that a cylindrical antagonistic cusp (actuator) contacted the internal palatal cusp slope of the restoration. Cyclic loading was applied at a frequency of 5 Hz, starting with a load of 200 N, increasing by 100 N every 2000 cycles. Samples were loaded until fracture and the number of endured cycles and failure modes of each specimen was recorded. Each sample was also evaluated for crack propensity during the experiment and for final failure mode (reparable failures above the CEJ [cementoenamel junction] vs irreparable failures below the CEJ).Shrinkage-induced cracks (>3 mm) were found in most specimens for both direct groups (66% to 83%) but not with inlays. The survival of inlays with a SFRC base was superior to that of the direct SFRC restorations and Gradia Direct (control) restorations (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and post-hoc log-rank test p < 0.000). The direct control group without SFRC exhibited not only the poorest survival but also 100% catastrophic failure (vs 42% and 17% for SFRC direct and SFRC inlays, respectively).Large MOD restorations with severely undermined cusps were most favorably restored with an SFRC base and a CAD/CAM inlay, yielding the highest survival rate, more reparable failures and absence of shrinkage-induced cracks. When a low-cost restoration must be chosen, the SFRC base will significantly improve the performance and failure mode of directly layered restorations." @default.
• W4366996652 created "2023-04-27" @default.
• W4366996652 creator A5017136171 @default.
• W4366996652 creator A5042345720 @default.
• W4366996652 date "2023-04-24" @default.
• W4366996652 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4366996652 title "Short-fiber Reinforced MOD Restorations of Molars with Severely Undermined Cusps." @default.
• W4366996652 doi "https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b4051477" @default.
• W4366996652 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37097055" @default.
• W4366996652 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4366996652 type Work @default.
• W4366996652 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4366996652 countsByYear W43669966522023 @default.
• W4366996652 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4366996652 hasAuthorship W4366996652A5017136171 @default.
• W4366996652 hasAuthorship W4366996652A5042345720 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C156887251 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C180145272 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C190719290 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C2778400075 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C2779263046 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C53256841 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConcept C79584836 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C104779481 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C156887251 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C159985019 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C180145272 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C190719290 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C192562407 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C199343813 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C202271784 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C2524010 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C2778400075 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C2779263046 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C33923547 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C53256841 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C71924100 @default.
• W4366996652 hasConceptScore W4366996652C79584836 @default.
• W4366996652 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4366996652 hasLocation W43669966521 @default.
• W4366996652 hasOpenAccess W4366996652 @default.
• W4366996652 hasPrimaryLocation W43669966521 @default.
• W4366996652 hasRelatedWork W118922958 @default.
• W4366996652 hasRelatedWork W2038893982 @default.
• W4366996652 hasRelatedWork W2046122881 @default.
• W4366996652 hasRelatedWork W2297491659 @default.
• W4366996652 hasRelatedWork W2347469006 @default.
• W4366996652 hasRelatedWork W2402024892 @default.
• W4366996652 hasRelatedWork W2417491401 @default.
• W4366996652 hasRelatedWork W2464807632 @default.
• W4366996652 hasRelatedWork W4229027931 @default.
• W4366996652 hasRelatedWork W4366996652 @default.
• W4366996652 hasVolume "25" @default.
• W4366996652 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4366996652 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4366996652 workType "article" @default.