FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4367018747> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4367018747 abstract "Introduction Continued advancements in the treatments for neurological disease have helped interventionalists to refine approaches that offer improved surgical efficacy and patient outcomes. Carotid‐artery stenting (CAS) is a safe and effective alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA), that allows for revascularization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in a minimally‐invasive manner. Traditionally, the mainstay for CAS has been through the femoral artery; however, patients with carotid‐artery disease (CAD) often have concomitant peripheral artery disease which confer increased risk of significant life‐threatening access‐site complications, such as retroperitoneal hematoma and limb ischemia. Given this, CAS via the radial artery has become increasingly popular. This study seeks to investigate the safety and feasibility of the transradial approach (TRA), in comparison to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA), for carotid‐artery stenting. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of all adult patients (age >18) who underwent carotid‐artery stenting via TRA or TFA over a 4‐year study period (2018‐2021) across 4 different international academic centers. Important variables, such as patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, results, and complications were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the strength of association and correlation for these variables. Results A total of 313 patients were enrolled during the study period. CAS via TFA was attempted in 251 patients and via TRA in 62 patients, respectively. Overall, CAS via TRA was found to be successful in 48/62 (76%) patients, and via TFA in 246/251 (98%) patients. Baseline demographics were similar for the two groups, with a female gender predilection, median age of 69, and hypertension and hyperlipidemia serving as the most common medical comorbidities. 14/62 (22.6%) patients who underwent TRA were converted to TFA. Spasm of the radial artery, kinking of the catheter and severe tortuosity of the vessels were the primary reasons for access site conversion. A total of five major access site‐related complications, including two deaths, and seven minor complications were noted in the TFA cohort. No serious access related complications were noted in the TRA group. In the multivariate‐analysis, after adjusting for age, hyperlipidemia, chronic heart failure, combination of stent plus angioplasty and fluoroscopy times, there was no statistically significant difference observed among the 2 groups in terms of procedural (OR: 0.31; CI: 0.36‐2.69; P = 0.29) and overall access site complications (OR: 0.17, CI: 0.02‐1.98, P = 0.16). Conclusions TRA seems to be a safe alternative approach for carotid stenting. In our cohort, no serious access site‐related complications were noted with TRA in comparison to the TFA group. Continued improvements in terms of patient selection, sample size, as well as advances in technique and technology will help to further refine TRA for CAS. Further studies and analysis will need to be performed to delineate the crucial variables that contribute to improved functional outcomes for these patients." @default.
• W4367018747 created "2023-04-27" @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5005814676 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5007135458 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5008384414 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5008582807 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5016302815 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5021747058 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5030871376 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5031212154 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5037367242 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5050231752 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5052829401 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5053752894 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5055024715 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5064492621 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5072749071 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5075805302 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5086762560 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5088699436 @default.
• W4367018747 creator A5091249617 @default.
• W4367018747 date "2023-03-01" @default.
• W4367018747 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W4367018747 title "Abstract Number ‐ 94: An International, Multi‐Center‐Analysis Of The Safety And Feasibility Of Transradial Approach For Carotid‐Artery Stenting" @default.
• W4367018747 doi "https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.03.suppl_1.094" @default.
• W4367018747 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4367018747 type Work @default.
• W4367018747 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4367018747 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5005814676 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5007135458 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5008384414 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5008582807 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5016302815 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5021747058 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5030871376 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5031212154 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5037367242 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5050231752 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5052829401 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5053752894 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5055024715 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5064492621 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5072749071 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5075805302 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5086762560 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5088699436 @default.
• W4367018747 hasAuthorship W4367018747A5091249617 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C2776184368 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C2779169563 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C2779384505 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C2779723990 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C2781068581 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C2987047532 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C126322002 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C126838900 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C141071460 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C164705383 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C2776184368 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C2779169563 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C2779384505 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C2779464278 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C2779723990 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C2781068581 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C2987047532 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C500558357 @default.
• W4367018747 hasConceptScore W4367018747C71924100 @default.
• W4367018747 hasIssue "S1" @default.
• W4367018747 hasLocation W43670187471 @default.
• W4367018747 hasOpenAccess W4367018747 @default.
• W4367018747 hasPrimaryLocation W43670187471 @default.
• W4367018747 hasRelatedWork W1966205997 @default.
• W4367018747 hasRelatedWork W2126824090 @default.
• W4367018747 hasRelatedWork W2130243920 @default.
• W4367018747 hasRelatedWork W2137893083 @default.
• W4367018747 hasRelatedWork W2961633488 @default.
• W4367018747 hasRelatedWork W3017055160 @default.
• W4367018747 hasRelatedWork W3136923076 @default.
• W4367018747 hasRelatedWork W4206834973 @default.
• W4367018747 hasRelatedWork W4280523441 @default.
• W4367018747 hasRelatedWork W6222517 @default.
• W4367018747 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W4367018747 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4367018747 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4367018747 workType "article" @default.