Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4367056952> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 73 of
73
with 100 items per page.
- W4367056952 endingPage "1224" @default.
- W4367056952 startingPage "1217" @default.
- W4367056952 abstract "ObjectivesModel-based cost-effectiveness analyses can inform decisions about screening guidelines by quantifying consequences of alternative algorithms. Although actual screening adherence is imperfect, incorporating nonadherence into analyses that aim to determine optimal screening may affect the policy recommendations. We evaluated the impact of nonadherence assumptions on the optimal cervical cancer screening in Norway.MethodsWe used a microsimulation model of cervical carcinogenesis to project the long-term health and economic outcomes under alternative screening algorithms and adherence patterns. We compared 18 algorithms involving primary human papillomavirus testing (5-yearly) that varied follow-up management of different human papillomavirus results. We considered 12 adherence scenarios: perfect adherence, 8 high- and low-coverage “random-complier” scenarios, and 3 “systematic-complier” scenarios that reflect conditional screening behavior over a lifetime. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and considered a strategy with the highest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio < 55 000 US dollars/quality-adjusted life-year as “optimal.”ResultsUnder perfect adherence, the least intensive screening strategy was optimal; in contrast, assuming any nonadherence resulted in a more intensive optimal strategy. Accounting for lower adherence resulted in both lower costs and health benefits, which allowed for a more intensive strategy to be considered optimal, but more harms for women who screen according to guidelines (ie, up to 41% more colposcopies when comparing the optimal strategy in the lowest-adherence scenario with the optimal strategy under perfect adherence).ConclusionsAssuming nonadherence in analyses designed to inform national guidelines may lead to a relatively more intensive recommendation. Designing guidelines for those who do not adhere to them may lead to over-screening of those who do." @default.
- W4367056952 created "2023-04-27" @default.
- W4367056952 creator A5023913678 @default.
- W4367056952 creator A5039782534 @default.
- W4367056952 creator A5056799177 @default.
- W4367056952 creator A5064410439 @default.
- W4367056952 creator A5075922755 @default.
- W4367056952 date "2023-08-01" @default.
- W4367056952 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W4367056952 title "Designing Guidelines for Those Who Do Not Follow Them: The Impact of Adherence Assumptions on Optimal Screening Guidelines" @default.
- W4367056952 cites W1994222210 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2087185523 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2105931327 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2109840766 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2150799358 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2170239385 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2464709620 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2586260676 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2621204123 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2743748505 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2760970467 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2783482355 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2888613042 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W2897465631 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W3089372390 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W3135721810 @default.
- W4367056952 cites W3205762943 @default.
- W4367056952 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.04.005" @default.
- W4367056952 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37116697" @default.
- W4367056952 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4367056952 type Work @default.
- W4367056952 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4367056952 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4367056952 hasAuthorship W4367056952A5023913678 @default.
- W4367056952 hasAuthorship W4367056952A5039782534 @default.
- W4367056952 hasAuthorship W4367056952A5056799177 @default.
- W4367056952 hasAuthorship W4367056952A5064410439 @default.
- W4367056952 hasAuthorship W4367056952A5075922755 @default.
- W4367056952 hasBestOaLocation W43670569521 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConcept C127454912 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConceptScore W4367056952C127454912 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConceptScore W4367056952C144133560 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConceptScore W4367056952C162118730 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConceptScore W4367056952C18903297 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConceptScore W4367056952C71924100 @default.
- W4367056952 hasConceptScore W4367056952C86803240 @default.
- W4367056952 hasFunder F4320310758 @default.
- W4367056952 hasIssue "8" @default.
- W4367056952 hasLocation W43670569521 @default.
- W4367056952 hasLocation W43670569522 @default.
- W4367056952 hasOpenAccess W4367056952 @default.
- W4367056952 hasPrimaryLocation W43670569521 @default.
- W4367056952 hasRelatedWork W108895347 @default.
- W4367056952 hasRelatedWork W1973805835 @default.
- W4367056952 hasRelatedWork W1998154948 @default.
- W4367056952 hasRelatedWork W201750452 @default.
- W4367056952 hasRelatedWork W2056701236 @default.
- W4367056952 hasRelatedWork W2252603590 @default.
- W4367056952 hasRelatedWork W2465257048 @default.
- W4367056952 hasRelatedWork W2884375869 @default.
- W4367056952 hasRelatedWork W3121276253 @default.
- W4367056952 hasRelatedWork W576732646 @default.
- W4367056952 hasVolume "26" @default.
- W4367056952 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4367056952 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4367056952 workType "article" @default.