FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4367057599> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4367057599 endingPage "69" @default.
• W4367057599 startingPage "67" @default.
• W4367057599 abstract "Back ground: Hernia is the protrusion of whole or a part of a viscus through the wall that contains it. It can occur anywhere in the body, but more commonly occurs in the inguinal region and umbilicus. Umbilical hernias protrude directly through the umbilical tube, while paraumbilical hernias occur just adjacent to the umbilical tube. Repair of umbilical and paraumbilical hernias follow the same principle. Apart from the basic protocol of repairing the fascial defect and reinforcing the fascia with a mesh, the placement of the mesh also plays a crucial role in determining the outcome of the surgery and long term complications.Sublay versus onlay mesh placement is well debated.In this study we attempted to compare both the procedures in terms of operative difficulty, post-operative complications, drain out time,long term recurrence rates etc.in the last few decades mesh repair of hernia became the standard treatment in all types of hernia including para umbilical hernia (PUH),position of mesh placement either onlay or sublay still an issue of debate,in this study we trying to address advantages and disadvantages of each position.Materials and Methodology: in this study we recruited 30 patients with paraumbilical hernia, patients were randomly allocated according to mesh placement position into sublay group 15 patients and onlay group 15 patients,preoperative,operative and follow up data of all participants were properly presented and analyzed using the suitable statistical tests.Results:The mean operative time in the sublay group was 110.3 minutes,while in the onlay group it was 84.3 minutes respectively.Hospital stay in the onlay group was significantly longer compared to the onlay group (p=0.001). Duration for drain removal was significantly shorter in sub lay group.post-operative complications in the form of superficial wound infection occured in 4 patients of the onlay group and only 2 cases of the sublay group, seroma formation occured in 2 patients of the onlay group & 1 patient of the sublay group,While post-operative chest infection was encountered in 1 patient of the sublay group, No incidence of recurrence was recorded from both groups during the 6 month follow up. Conclusions: Both sublay and onlay mesh placement techniques are safe, both produced acceptable results, and are associated with comparable complications and recurrence rates." @default.
• W4367057599 created "2023-04-27" @default.
• W4367057599 creator A5037938008 @default.
• W4367057599 creator A5049032878 @default.
• W4367057599 creator A5053181034 @default.
• W4367057599 creator A5080154368 @default.
• W4367057599 date "2023-03-15" @default.
• W4367057599 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4367057599 title "A STUDY OF COMPARISON BETWEEN ONLAY VERSUS SUBLAY MESHPLASTY IN CASES OF VENTRAL HERNIA (UMBILICAL AND PARAUMBILICAL) AMONG ADULTS: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY CONDUCTED AT ONE OF THE TERTIARY CARE CENTRES OF NORTHERN PROVINCE IN INDIA" @default.
• W4367057599 doi "https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/4809001" @default.
• W4367057599 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4367057599 type Work @default.
• W4367057599 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4367057599 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4367057599 hasAuthorship W4367057599A5037938008 @default.
• W4367057599 hasAuthorship W4367057599A5049032878 @default.
• W4367057599 hasAuthorship W4367057599A5053181034 @default.
• W4367057599 hasAuthorship W4367057599A5080154368 @default.
• W4367057599 hasBestOaLocation W43670575991 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConcept C148805740 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConcept C2779096551 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConcept C2779270285 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConcept C2781197730 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConcept C2781223772 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConceptScore W4367057599C141071460 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConceptScore W4367057599C148805740 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConceptScore W4367057599C2779096551 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConceptScore W4367057599C2779270285 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConceptScore W4367057599C2781197730 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConceptScore W4367057599C2781223772 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConceptScore W4367057599C61434518 @default.
• W4367057599 hasConceptScore W4367057599C71924100 @default.
• W4367057599 hasLocation W43670575991 @default.
• W4367057599 hasOpenAccess W4367057599 @default.
• W4367057599 hasPrimaryLocation W43670575991 @default.
• W4367057599 hasRelatedWork W1596245490 @default.
• W4367057599 hasRelatedWork W2087533596 @default.
• W4367057599 hasRelatedWork W2114594253 @default.
• W4367057599 hasRelatedWork W3011085960 @default.
• W4367057599 hasRelatedWork W3025699807 @default.
• W4367057599 hasRelatedWork W3115401438 @default.
• W4367057599 hasRelatedWork W3204672547 @default.
• W4367057599 hasRelatedWork W4206681876 @default.
• W4367057599 hasRelatedWork W4232112505 @default.
• W4367057599 hasRelatedWork W1601598138 @default.
• W4367057599 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4367057599 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4367057599 workType "article" @default.