Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4367152083> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W4367152083 abstract "Introduction Rescue stenting may be considered during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) if a newly recanalized intracranial vessel keeps re‐occluding, or recanalization is not achieved with conventional thrombectomy methods. There are multiple published case series with mixed results on safety and efficacy of this approach, and there are no available randomized trials. We aimed to compare the outcomes of rescue intracranial stenting with unsuccessful/poor reperfusion after MT. Methods Retrospective review of ischemic stroke patients who underwent MT from 2016–2021. Emergent intracranial stent patients were selected and compared with those who had poor/unsuccessful post‐procedural reperfusion (TICI 0–2a). Initial ASPECT score, NIHSS, number of passes, and MT method (aspiration vs stentriever) were recorded. Complications (intracranial hemorrhage, vessel perforation, groin or retroperitoneal hematoma, or distal embolization), final infarct size, 90‐day mRS, and mortality were analyzed. Results Sixteen patients underwent emergent intracranial stenting. Of the 89patients with failed MT, 34 had TICI 2a, 11 had TICI 1, and 44 had TICI 0 reperfusion. All 16 stenting patients achieved TICI 2B‐3 grade recanalization. Pre‐procedure ASPECT score was similar between both groups. Six patients had either intracranial vertebral or basilar artery stenting, and 10 had either intracranial ICA or MCA stenting. Patients with posterior compared to anterior circulation involvement were more likely to receive stenting (50% vs 11%, p = 0.003). There were no differences in the stenting versus non‐stenting group in 24‐hour post intervention NIHSS, post‐procedural complications, intracranial hemorrhage, infarct size, and mortality (75% vs 67%). The stenting group had better functional independence (mRS 0–2) at 90 days (33% vs 11%, p = 0.04). There were no outcome differences in anterior compared to posterior circulation stenting. Conclusions Rescue stenting was more often seen with posterior circulation strokes. In patients with failed or unsuccessful reperfusion after conventional MT, emergent stenting achieved better 90‐day functional independence without increasing rates of complications, intracranial hemorrhage, or mortality." @default.
- W4367152083 created "2023-04-28" @default.
- W4367152083 creator A5000217325 @default.
- W4367152083 creator A5017166627 @default.
- W4367152083 creator A5023939887 @default.
- W4367152083 creator A5053420299 @default.
- W4367152083 creator A5088522880 @default.
- W4367152083 date "2023-03-01" @default.
- W4367152083 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W4367152083 title "Abstract Number ‐ 154: Outcomes of Rescue Intracranial Stenting vs Failed Recanalization during Mechanical Thrombectomy" @default.
- W4367152083 doi "https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.03.suppl_1.154" @default.
- W4367152083 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4367152083 type Work @default.
- W4367152083 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4367152083 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4367152083 hasAuthorship W4367152083A5000217325 @default.
- W4367152083 hasAuthorship W4367152083A5017166627 @default.
- W4367152083 hasAuthorship W4367152083A5023939887 @default.
- W4367152083 hasAuthorship W4367152083A5053420299 @default.
- W4367152083 hasAuthorship W4367152083A5088522880 @default.
- W4367152083 hasBestOaLocation W43671520831 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C190659310 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C2776035437 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C2779493405 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C2779662492 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C2780931571 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C3020199598 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C541997718 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C126322002 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C126838900 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C141071460 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C190659310 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C191897082 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C192562407 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C2776035437 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C2778456384 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C2778527123 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C2778583881 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C2779493405 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C2779662492 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C2780931571 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C3020199598 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C541997718 @default.
- W4367152083 hasConceptScore W4367152083C71924100 @default.
- W4367152083 hasIssue "S1" @default.
- W4367152083 hasLocation W43671520831 @default.
- W4367152083 hasOpenAccess W4367152083 @default.
- W4367152083 hasPrimaryLocation W43671520831 @default.
- W4367152083 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W4367152083 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
- W4367152083 hasRelatedWork W2073570175 @default.
- W4367152083 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W4367152083 hasRelatedWork W2356672928 @default.
- W4367152083 hasRelatedWork W2376769477 @default.
- W4367152083 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
- W4367152083 hasRelatedWork W3031999786 @default.
- W4367152083 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
- W4367152083 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
- W4367152083 hasVolume "3" @default.
- W4367152083 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4367152083 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4367152083 workType "article" @default.