FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4367182169> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4367182169 endingPage "e980" @default.
• W4367182169 startingPage "e973" @default.
• W4367182169 abstract "Introduction: The accurate assessment and grading of adverse events (AE) is essential to ensure comparisons between surgical procedures and outcomes. The current lack of a standardized severity grading system may limit our understanding of the true morbidity attributed to AEs in surgery. The aim of this study is to review the prevalence in which intraoperative adverse event (iAE) severity grading systems are used in the literature, evaluate the strengths and limitations of these systems, and appraise their applicability in clinical studies. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried to yield all clinical studies reporting the proposal and/or the validation of iAE severity grading systems. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched separately to identify the articles citing the systems to grade iAEs identified in the first search. Results: Our search yielded 2957 studies, with 7 studies considered for the qualitative synthesis. Five studies considered only surgical/interventional iAEs, while 2 considered both surgical/interventional and anesthesiologic iAEs. Two included studies validated the iAE severity grading system prospectively. A total of 357 citations were retrieved, with an overall self/nonself-citation ratio of 0.17 (53/304). The majority of citing articles were clinical studies (44.1%). The average number of citations per year was 6.7 citations for each classification/severity system, with only 2.05 citations/year for clinical studies. Of the 158 clinical studies citing the severity grading systems, only 90 (56.9%) used them to grade the iAEs. The appraisal of applicability (mean%/median%) was below the 70% threshold in 3 domains: stakeholder involvement (46/47), clarity of presentation (65/67), and applicability (57/56). Conclusion: Seven severity grading systems for iAEs have been published in the last decade. Despite the importance of collecting and grading the iAEs, these systems are poorly adopted, with only a few studies per year using them. A uniform globally implemented severity grading system is needed to produce comparable data across studies and develop strategies to decrease iAEs, further improving patient safety." @default.
• W4367182169 created "2023-04-28" @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5002496718 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5008765130 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5009453972 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5022334478 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5023440692 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5027790043 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5034875820 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5047742848 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5049575711 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5061933882 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5066410499 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5068677739 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5078873368 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5085177851 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5088526627 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5088743764 @default.
• W4367182169 creator A5090375310 @default.
• W4367182169 date "2023-04-27" @default.
• W4367182169 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W4367182169 title "Severity Grading Systems for Intraoperative Adverse Events. A Systematic Review of the Literature and Citation Analysis" @default.
• W4367182169 cites W1969728666 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W1977965890 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W1982388096 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2012826488 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2019472660 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2043861297 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2082866380 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2096998881 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2097996681 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2129688566 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2144173184 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2263572070 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2577651221 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2786448559 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2787075045 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2801769596 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2951971628 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W2989693274 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W3033780089 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W3080350485 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W3190027829 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W4212855800 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W4280513944 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W4281715480 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W4284886099 @default.
• W4367182169 cites W4319748851 @default.
• W4367182169 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000005883" @default.
• W4367182169 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37185890" @default.
• W4367182169 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4367182169 type Work @default.
• W4367182169 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4367182169 countsByYear W43671821692023 @default.
• W4367182169 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5002496718 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5008765130 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5009453972 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5022334478 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5023440692 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5027790043 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5034875820 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5047742848 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5049575711 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5061933882 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5066410499 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5068677739 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5078873368 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5085177851 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5088526627 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5088743764 @default.
• W4367182169 hasAuthorship W4367182169A5090375310 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C3020774429 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConceptScore W4367182169C126322002 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConceptScore W4367182169C127413603 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConceptScore W4367182169C147176958 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConceptScore W4367182169C161191863 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConceptScore W4367182169C17744445 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConceptScore W4367182169C189708586 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConceptScore W4367182169C19527891 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConceptScore W4367182169C197934379 @default.
• W4367182169 hasConceptScore W4367182169C199539241 @default.

• next