Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4367291702> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W4367291702 endingPage "307" @default.
- W4367291702 startingPage "283" @default.
- W4367291702 abstract "In this article, we provide an overview of efforts to regulate the various phases of the artificial intelligence (AI) life cycle. In doing so, we examine whether—and, if so, to what extent—highly fragmented legal frameworks are able to provide safeguards capable of preventing the dangers that stem from AI- and algorithm-driven organisational practices. We critically analyse related developments at the European Union (EU) level, namely the General Data Protection Regulation, the draft AI Regulation, and the proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work. We also consider bills and regulations proposed or adopted in the United States and Canada via a transatlantic comparative approach, underlining analogies and variations between EU and North American attitudes towards the risk assessment and management of AI systems. We aim to answer the following questions: Is the widely adopted risk-based approach fit for purpose? Is it consistent with the actual enforcement of fundamental rights at work, such as privacy, human dignity, equality and collective rights? To answer these questions, in section 2 we unpack the various, often ambiguous, facets of the notion(s) of ‘risk’—that is, the common denominator with the EU and North American legal instruments. Here, we determine that a scalable, decentralised framework is not appropriate for ensuring the enforcement of constitutional labour-related rights. In addition to presenting the key provisions of existing schemes in the EU and North America, in section 3 we disentangle the consistencies and tensions between the frameworks that regulate AI and constrain how it must be handled in specific contexts, such as work environments and platform-orchestrated arrangements. Paradoxically, the frenzied race to regulate AI-driven decision-making could exacerbate the current legal uncertainty and pave the way for regulatory arbitrage. Such a scenario would slow technological innovation and egregiously undermine labour rights. Thus, in section 4 we advocate for the adoption of a dedicated legal instrument at the supranational level to govern technologies that manage people in workplaces. Given the high stakes involved, we conclude by stressing the salience of a multi-stakeholder AI governance framework." @default.
- W4367291702 created "2023-04-29" @default.
- W4367291702 creator A5054304877 @default.
- W4367291702 creator A5063830838 @default.
- W4367291702 date "2023-04-26" @default.
- W4367291702 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W4367291702 title "Between risk mitigation and labour rights enforcement: Assessing the transatlantic race to govern AI-driven decision-making through a comparative lens" @default.
- W4367291702 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231167982" @default.
- W4367291702 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4367291702 type Work @default.
- W4367291702 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4367291702 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4367291702 hasAuthorship W4367291702A5054304877 @default.
- W4367291702 hasAuthorship W4367291702A5063830838 @default.
- W4367291702 hasBestOaLocation W43672917021 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C2778745096 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C2779547435 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C69360830 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C127413603 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C144024400 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C144133560 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C155202549 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C169437150 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C17744445 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C18762648 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C190253527 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C199360897 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C199539241 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C2778745096 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C2779547435 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C2779777834 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C2910001868 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C41008148 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C69360830 @default.
- W4367291702 hasConceptScore W4367291702C78519656 @default.
- W4367291702 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4367291702 hasLocation W43672917021 @default.
- W4367291702 hasOpenAccess W4367291702 @default.
- W4367291702 hasPrimaryLocation W43672917021 @default.
- W4367291702 hasRelatedWork W2015101705 @default.
- W4367291702 hasRelatedWork W2047896827 @default.
- W4367291702 hasRelatedWork W2154670250 @default.
- W4367291702 hasRelatedWork W2322270658 @default.
- W4367291702 hasRelatedWork W2325213056 @default.
- W4367291702 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W4367291702 hasRelatedWork W2996876944 @default.
- W4367291702 hasRelatedWork W3000334240 @default.
- W4367291702 hasRelatedWork W4226269692 @default.
- W4367291702 hasRelatedWork W4286007457 @default.
- W4367291702 hasVolume "14" @default.
- W4367291702 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4367291702 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4367291702 workType "article" @default.