FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4367302595> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4367302595 abstract "The aim of this study is to propose a comparison between wind and seismic loads on a multi-story reinforced concrete (RC) building. The investigation focuses on lateral displacements and story drifts of a 6-story RC structure, which are determined manually using the base shear method and with the aid of the ETABS software tool. The study considers a linearity of the structure and uses the Chinese building design code for lateral displacement analysis. The base shear method is a simplified method that only considers one degree of freedom for each story, neglecting the non-linearity of the structures. However, the Chinese building code permits its use when considering the consistent vertical distribution of the building's mass and stiffness, which leads to shear deformation prevailing during seismic and wind reactions. The lateral displacements under wind and seismic loads are estimated, and the story drift limitation criteria of the Chinese building design code are assessed. Both the base shear method and ETABS's story drift computation (story drift 1/550) meet the design code criteria. This indicates that the base shear technique approach of RC frame structures can reasonably predict the tale drift on each story, despite relying heavily on simplifications. To compare the outcomes from the ETABS program to the internal forces under seismic and wind load activities, the story displacements and drifts are computed. The results show little discrepancy between the base shear method and ETABS software. Hence, the base shear approach can be utilized when there is no irregularity, and the building height is less than 40 m. Overall, the findings of this study indicate that the base shear method can provide a good approximation for the lateral displacements and story drifts of multi-story RC constructions under wind and seismic loads, provided that the Chinese building code criteria are met. The study highlights the importance of using appropriate design codes and tools in ensuring the safety and reliability of structures. Further research can explore the applicability of similar simplified methods in more complex and irregular structures, and the development of more accurate and efficient design tools." @default.
• W4367302595 created "2023-04-29" @default.
• W4367302595 creator A5044260333 @default.
• W4367302595 creator A5058271872 @default.
• W4367302595 date "2023-04-01" @default.
• W4367302595 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4367302595 title "A comparative study on the lateral displacement of a multi-story RC building under wind and earthquake load actions using base shear method and ETABS software" @default.
• W4367302595 cites W1997002772 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W2034494257 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W2078355526 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W2616653744 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W2619506223 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W2922038124 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W3012153336 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W3114957310 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W4282559523 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W4310715904 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W4320527562 @default.
• W4367302595 cites W4323923010 @default.
• W4367302595 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.287" @default.
• W4367302595 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4367302595 type Work @default.
• W4367302595 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4367302595 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4367302595 hasAuthorship W4367302595A5044260333 @default.
• W4367302595 hasAuthorship W4367302595A5058271872 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C145690102 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C182358397 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C22140971 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C2777212017 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C2779372316 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C2992625829 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C49204034 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C5900021 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConcept C96035792 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C127313418 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C127413603 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C145690102 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C182358397 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C199360897 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C22140971 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C2777212017 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C2777904410 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C2779372316 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C2992625829 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C41008148 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C49204034 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C5900021 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C66938386 @default.
• W4367302595 hasConceptScore W4367302595C96035792 @default.
• W4367302595 hasLocation W43673025951 @default.
• W4367302595 hasOpenAccess W4367302595 @default.
• W4367302595 hasPrimaryLocation W43673025951 @default.
• W4367302595 hasRelatedWork W1988721404 @default.
• W4367302595 hasRelatedWork W2124459141 @default.
• W4367302595 hasRelatedWork W2133570357 @default.
• W4367302595 hasRelatedWork W2161816994 @default.
• W4367302595 hasRelatedWork W2363718127 @default.
• W4367302595 hasRelatedWork W2948476696 @default.
• W4367302595 hasRelatedWork W2970286506 @default.
• W4367302595 hasRelatedWork W3181225875 @default.
• W4367302595 hasRelatedWork W3195523340 @default.
• W4367302595 hasRelatedWork W2947482752 @default.
• W4367302595 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4367302595 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4367302595 workType "article" @default.