FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4367304230> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4367304230 endingPage "14" @default.
• W4367304230 startingPage "3" @default.
• W4367304230 abstract "Introduction . The article presents an attempt for the first time, on the basis of philosophical and legal understanding, to use the concept of “reputation”, which is new for legal scientific circulation. Legal terms, including criminal procedural ones, arise as generic terms. That is, concepts are brought under a common genus, and then specific differences are distinguished. Philosophical categories, due to their universality, cannot be summed up under the genus, and, as a rule, act as a dialectical pair of opposites the thesis and antithesis. Such, for example, are the concepts of essence and phenomenon, necessity and chance, content and form. The complexity of introducing a new concept of reputation into scientific circulation lies in the fact that it does not have its own dialectical antithesis. A bad reputation is also a reputation. At a stretch, reputation can be opposed to discredit, but discredit is an action aimed at undermining reputation, and this is a transition to another kind. Concepts of this kind can be meaningful by analogy. As such, the authors chose the dialectical pair icon image, like foreign-language tracing papers from the Russian word image, which in the legal sense are reduced to reputation. Both that and another (both an icon and an image) are an image, but how different and even opposite are the meanings of these words. Moreover, initially the intentions of the authors were precisely linguistic (and not religious or marketing), and only then the words themselves designated the cultural area of their application. Materials and methods . The theoretical and methodological basis of the study was the hermeneutical approach to the analysis of the concept of reputation. Methods of systematic, comparative legal analysis, special philosophical and legal research tools were used. The authors used examples from various areas of law criminal procedure, criminal, civil. Research results. Based on the results of the analysis, the question of trust is raised in relation to the procedural status of participants in criminal proceedings. The introduction of the concept of reputation as a legal category into legal circulation is proposed. Discussion and conclusion. In the form of a legislative novel, the presumption of good faith of a participant in criminal proceedings is formulated. Presumption of good faith: Everyone is considered conscientious and reasonable, until otherwise is proved in the manner prescribed by this Code and established by a judicial act that has entered into legal force.Everyone is not obliged to prove their conscientiousness and reasonableness. The burden of proving dishonesty, unreasonableness, abuse of right lies with the person who claims the opposite.All doubts about the good faith and reasonableness of a person that cannot be eliminated in the manner prescribed by this Code shall be interpreted in favor of the person whose reputation is questioned.Any procedural actions and (or) decisions of a state body or an official in the field of criminal proceedings, even based on assumptions, cannot be based solely on the fact that a person has a certain procedural status in a case under consideration or another." @default.
• W4367304230 created "2023-04-29" @default.
• W4367304230 creator A5014297023 @default.
• W4367304230 creator A5038820447 @default.
• W4367304230 date "2023-04-26" @default.
• W4367304230 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4367304230 title "Philosophical and Legal Understanding of the Concepts: Image, Icon, Image, Honesty, Reputation, Their Manifestations in Criminal Procedural Law" @default.
• W4367304230 cites W3003403617 @default.
• W4367304230 doi "https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2023-1-66-3-14" @default.
• W4367304230 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4367304230 type Work @default.
• W4367304230 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4367304230 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4367304230 hasAuthorship W4367304230A5014297023 @default.
• W4367304230 hasAuthorship W4367304230A5038820447 @default.
• W4367304230 hasBestOaLocation W43673042301 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C13184196 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C2777935057 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C2778447006 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C48798503 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConcept C521332185 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C111472728 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C13184196 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C138885662 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C144024400 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C15744967 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C17744445 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C199360897 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C199539241 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C2777935057 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C2778447006 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C41008148 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C48798503 @default.
• W4367304230 hasConceptScore W4367304230C521332185 @default.
• W4367304230 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4367304230 hasLocation W43673042301 @default.
• W4367304230 hasOpenAccess W4367304230 @default.
• W4367304230 hasPrimaryLocation W43673042301 @default.
• W4367304230 hasRelatedWork W1490580373 @default.
• W4367304230 hasRelatedWork W1975822280 @default.
• W4367304230 hasRelatedWork W2363439677 @default.
• W4367304230 hasRelatedWork W2598089821 @default.
• W4367304230 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4367304230 hasRelatedWork W2800976382 @default.
• W4367304230 hasRelatedWork W3048327347 @default.
• W4367304230 hasRelatedWork W3106826626 @default.
• W4367304230 hasRelatedWork W3119726681 @default.
• W4367304230 hasRelatedWork W4205408585 @default.
• W4367304230 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W4367304230 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4367304230 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4367304230 workType "article" @default.